LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Which oil pan to use with 396 stoker?

Old Apr 10, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
Crazyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 81
Which oil pan to use with 396 stoker?

What oil pan has a good bang for the buck/ performance and actually fit in my engine bay with SLP headers(single cat)?
it would also be nice to have some windage tray features? Any suggestions
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
Well there aint many choices. You can either run Canton or Canton... which would you like?

Although I could have swore I saw a Stef's pan for LT's some time ago. Either way, I'm sure Stef's could build one if you're interested.

The Canton has a windage tray, trap doors and a scraper. It's not the best quality in the world but it's about your only choice unless you can fab.

I have the Canton pan on my engine but no SLP headers so I'm afraid I can't help you much there. Surely someone will chime in with more specifics.

-Mindgame
Old Apr 11, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
You might want to mention what kind of engine you are talking about, and what car it is going into..... that might affect the answer .
Old Apr 11, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
amean94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
i am using a hamburger 86 and up stroker pan and it works great on my 396
Old Apr 11, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
Crazyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 81
The application is a 396 LT1 in a '95 trans Am.
I thought that was clear from my sig but I missed the '95 part.
Old Apr 11, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
jonaddis84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,639
From: Toledo, OH
The milodon 30909 pan is a low profile stroker pan for 86-up SBC, clears 4" stroke crank and eagle style hbeam rods. No low oil level sensor bung but who the hell cares, if youre building a 396 im sure you check your oil regularly anyway. Its not much cheaper than the Canton though, and im not sure if it will fit a stock engine bay 4th gen, am sure it will clear a bmr kmember in a 4th gen though.
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally posted by Crazyboy
The application is a 396 LT1 in a '95 trans Am.
I thought that was clear from my sig but I missed the '95 part.
It is not clear from your signature.

All of your future topics that do not belong in "Advanced Tech" will simply be "closed"..... I'm not going to move them any more.

PLEASE read the guidelines, "stickied" at the top of the topic list, as to what belongs here and what doesn't.

LT1 SPECIFIC TOPICS ALONG THE LINES OF "WHAT IS THE BEST......" GENERALLY BELONG IN "LT1 TECH", OR "GENERAL F-BODY TECH"

PLEASE COOPERATE.
Old Apr 15, 2004 | 12:27 AM
  #8  
Lt1tko5o's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 261
From: Ft. Myers, Florida
I'm running the stock pan on my 396 stroker with eagle 6" rods. I had to put a few small dings in the right place to get clearence, but didn't cost a thing and I keep my "low oil sensor".


Brian
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
willismoons
Parts For Sale
3
May 27, 2015 04:03 PM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Apr 26, 2015 08:15 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.