LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

not the normal what cam thread, but what cam?

Old May 12, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #1  
1SlowFormula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,756
From: West Linn, OR
not the normal what cam thread, but what cam?

Hey guys,

I was going to go with the CC 305 that I have here after I eventually break the bolt-on LT1 record, but I have been thinking of maybe going a little more over the top with it. Drivability doesn't matter to me, nor does sound. I am looking for the biggest baddest cam for a pretty much drag only car but the only stipulation is it must work with the stock bottom end.

I have ported stockers that I will be puting on at the same time, it has a very nice port job, bigger valves and all that so I don't think I have to worry too much about the heads flowing enough...

Any thoughts?
Old May 12, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #2  
96' Formula WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 377
From: Green Cove Springs FL
I would definately have to say the gm 847. Its a sick cam that makes sick power especially with ported heads. Do you know what the heads flow.
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
Nitelite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 171
From: Missouri
I'd actually stay away from the gm847, unless you don't care about breaking the bottom end pretty soon. But I totally agree, it's an awesome cam!
Old May 12, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #4  
reamo04's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
id take the lunati 60123 over the 847 any day of the week
Old May 12, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #5  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
I would say a custom cam designed just for your setup would be the best.
Old May 12, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #6  
PortMasters's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 80
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by shoebox
I would say a custom cam designed just for your setup would be the best.
+1
Old May 12, 2008 | 11:06 PM
  #7  
BigBadBlack93Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 230
From: Katy, TX
Originally Posted by reamo04
id take the lunati 60123 over the 847 any day of the week
that lunati is bigger than the 847, should take out the short block in no time flat w/ some impressive numbers.
Old May 12, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #8  
Zigroid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 948
From: Stroudsburg, PA
Originally Posted by shoebox
I would say a custom cam designed just for your setup would be the best.
^^^
I called a professional and got a custom cam for "stock" bottom end and "stock" heads (hehe). its a 242/250. overcamming gets past the limitations of the stock heads, allows you to rev where you need to be...
then again my heads have been milled and have a valve job and port cleanup... and the bottom end has ARP rod bolts and has been balanced with new bearings and piston rings. luck varies from person to person. I am sure you know well.

to be 100% honest and to save cash I would run a GM847. it is a proven cam. I look to what atljar did a few years ago with a full weight car. you should have fun with it


btw... look forward to your progress at all times!
Old May 13, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #9  
1SlowFormula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,756
From: West Linn, OR
thanks guys...

The heads were ported by a local guy when these heads belonged to a buddy of mine, I have also sent them out to be inspected, the ports work touched up, a comp. valve job, the valves undercut, and the mating surface milled flat. As for flow they should now be close or better then LE2's...

Just out of curiosity is it only the rod bolts that we need to worry about in the stock bottom end if we want to spin it a little higher?

If so how much work is involved with replacing the rod bolts? One guy told me I could swap them out one at a time and be fine and another told me there was machine work involved and I would need to remove the rods completely. Which is true?

I almost feel if I am going through all the work of pulling the motor apart for doing rod bolts then refreshing the bottom end couldn't hurt, but how much does that cost? I see a bad spiral of money going out if I want to do anything in the bottom end...
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #10  
96' Formula WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 377
From: Green Cove Springs FL
yea it can get expensive just to take the bottom end apart and put it back together for one part. I dont think there is any machining required for rod bolts on stock cubes. If you dont want to spin it to the moon and 306 wouldnt hurt. I had a friend who had a 306 and some home ported heads and made about 385 to the wheels and only spun it to 6200. that kind of power in you light car= a fast *** car. But a custom cam is also a good idea.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QuickSilver02
Midwest
1
Apr 7, 2015 11:12 AM
carl.froehlich
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Mar 13, 2015 12:38 AM
armedtrigger
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Feb 24, 2015 08:30 PM
jayblev95
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Dec 1, 2014 06:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.