LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

New LT1 Tool!

Old Feb 27, 2008 | 05:33 AM
  #16  
Guest47904's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
If you read some of the articles from TPSI you will find that they would go racing and would need to pull the engine occasionally. While at the track, out the bottom was not an option. They came up with this "tool" to make their job faster.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #17  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
New???? TPIS was selling the Happy Hooker in 1995......

Did you catch the first sentence in the article?
Owning a 1993-2002 LT1-powered Camaro or Firebird is a beautiful thing.......
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #18  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
That happy hooker thing has always scared the begeesus out of me. The thought of bolting all that weight to those tiny little fuel rail bolt holes is pretty damn scary.

Out the bottom ftw.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #19  
Tex95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 347
From: Killeen, Texas
I have a Happy Hooker, and I like it pretty well.







No problems taking engine and tranny out togeather, though I was a little nervous about it at first, it worked quite well.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #20  
The Engineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,388
From: Moore Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
That happy hooker thing has always scared the begeesus out of me. The thought of bolting all that weight to those tiny little fuel rail bolt holes is pretty damn scary.

Out the bottom ftw.
X2 on that! I think those fuel rail bolts are 8mm each.

WD
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #21  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Figure the dia of the 4 bolts together and see if you can break that dia with 600lbs.
Happy Hooker works very well. Taking the nose off depends on the length of your cherry picker. Most need the nose off.
That dia is 4x8mm=32mm=1.26in or a bit over 1-1/4" A 1-1/4" shackle is a 12 ton capacity unit and that isn't the super duty shackle.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #22  
97ChameleonTA's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 307
From: Valrico, FL
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Figure the dia of the 4 bolts together and see if you can break that dia with 600lbs.
Happy Hooker works very well. Taking the nose off depends on the length of your cherry picker. Most need the nose off.
That dia is 4x8mm=32mm=1.26in or a bit over 1-1/4" A 1-1/4" shackle is a 12 ton capacity unit and that isn't the super duty shackle.
Your math is wrong... The area of each 8mm bolt is 50.265 , but each bolt can snap independent of the others so totaling them isn't the same as a single bolt, but still it only comes in at 201.06. Your super duty shackle has a total area of 804.25, which is 4 times the combined 8mm bolts, however it is purpose built for lifting loads as opposed to the intake bolts that are meant to only hold the injector rails in place. The load bearing capabilities of a certain diameter of the same metal is not linear so you can't say that since the 1.25" shackle holds 12 tons then the 4 bolts should hold 3 tons. I don't think the shackle/intake bolt is a fair comparison and i'm not even touching the side loading issues.

Just my 2¢
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #23  
95z28_m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 153
From: central illinois
never tried pulling it out the bottom. Ive had the motor in and out the top 2 times, and the second time only took a few hours once I got the hang of it. That was with the hood and the nose on, with a cherry picker, and 4 ft of chain.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #24  
95Bluestreak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 186
From: Jacksonville, Florida
There is NO WAY I would trust that thing to pull an engine let alone an engine and tranny. Those fuel rail bolts are small to begin with and the intake isn't the hardest metal made.. I would be worrying about threads ripping out. I will stick to pulling from the bottom, however I have pulled from the top with a standard engine hoist and chain, it's not that big of a deal.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #25  
Tex95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 347
From: Killeen, Texas
You do not use your OEM rail bolts. You use the supplied ( 8.8 3 F )stainless bolts

After removal and installation of the engine and tranny I checked out all the bolts no stretching or anything. even the supplied washers didnt bend.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #26  
evilundisguised's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by 97ChameleonTA
Your math is wrong... The area of each 8mm bolt is 50.265 , but each bolt can snap independent of the others so totaling them isn't the same as a single bolt, but still it only comes in at 201.06. Your super duty shackle has a total area of 804.25, which is 4 times the combined 8mm bolts, however it is purpose built for lifting loads as opposed to the intake bolts that are meant to only hold the injector rails in place. The load bearing capabilities of a certain diameter of the same metal is not linear so you can't say that since the 1.25" shackle holds 12 tons then the 4 bolts should hold 3 tons. I don't think the shackle/intake bolt is a fair comparison and i'm not even touching the side loading issues.

Just my 2¢
What units are you using? The actual bolts have a major diameter of 5.8mm, but let's give the benefit of the doubt and use the pitch diameter of 4.4mm. Assuming a (very) low tensile strength, 70ksi, stainless steel is used, I'm calculating that you could lift a 6600lb load with 4 bolts. At a small fraction of their load capacity, you can combine cross-section areas for calculation purposes because none are going to fail.

For practical purposes, load capacity (not strength) is linearly proportional to cross sectional area. The load capacity-diameter relationship is ^2 (as area relates to the square of radius).
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #27  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
I pulled mine thru the top with the intake off. I used the lifter retainer bosses in the lifter valley. They are a 5/16 thread, I believe. I'll be pulling mine again in the next few weeks. Missing clips for the comp r's
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #28  
87bandit's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 660
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Originally Posted by danhr
out the bottom is so freakin easy. I was intimidated at first, but now I can do one under under 3 or 4 hours. that's without the aid of a lift, and me working solo.
how high does the car need to be raised?
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #29  
danhr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,109
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by 87bandit
how high does the car need to be raised?
pretty much the highest you can get it. I used a 5 ton jack, got it the highest it will go, put a set of jackstands underneath it, and that was enough. That and a large friend sitting on the back bumper
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #30  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Out the bottom "how to"...

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/348183/6

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.