most power n/a with LT4 intake?
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by squinn
Reringed stock short block.
yes I know, I need to find a new place to put it
Reringed stock short block.
yes I know, I need to find a new place to put it
so your stock bottom end lt1, with ported lt1 castings and ported lt1 intake made 560 fwhp on a hydraulic roller cam?
i think that has to be a record or something.
you said you spun it to 7100.....so im guessing you had something other than the stock computer/optispark/ignition setup?
who ported the heads/intake?
my site is hosted by www.vnpixel.com , very reliable and decent pricing, check them out.
Last edited by got_hp?; Nov 17, 2003 at 03:56 PM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 442
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by squinn
Reringed stock short block.
Reringed stock short block.
Later
Chuck
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 296
From: Clawson, MI
Originally posted by got_hp?
so your stock bottom end lt1, with ported lt1 castings and ported lt1 intake made 560 fwhp on a hydraulic roller cam?
i think that has to be a record or something.
you said you spun it to 7100.....so im guessing you had something other than the stock computer/optispark/ignition setup?
who ported the heads/intake?
so your stock bottom end lt1, with ported lt1 castings and ported lt1 intake made 560 fwhp on a hydraulic roller cam?
i think that has to be a record or something.
you said you spun it to 7100.....so im guessing you had something other than the stock computer/optispark/ignition setup?
who ported the heads/intake?
Fast ecm with opti and a crank trigger.
we had ended up make 581 @ 7200 with a highly modified Lt1 intake on the same short block.
Modern Cylinder Head in the Detroit area did the heads
I do my own intakes.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 296
From: Clawson, MI
Originally posted by chucks97ss
I'm not trying to raise the bs flag... but that clearly is not what you told me about your short block a couple weeks ago. You said it's a 3.65 stroke crank. So the only things that could even remotely be "stock" are the rods. Whether you're running stock rods on a 600+ hp setup is beyond me, and really I don't care. Please clarify what you meant by this so that I can regain my trust in you stating that your car actually does have "GM cast LT1" heads and intake. That and/or WHY you're LT1 intake is so heavily modified (ie, little sneaky pete action).
Later
Chuck
I'm not trying to raise the bs flag... but that clearly is not what you told me about your short block a couple weeks ago. You said it's a 3.65 stroke crank. So the only things that could even remotely be "stock" are the rods. Whether you're running stock rods on a 600+ hp setup is beyond me, and really I don't care. Please clarify what you meant by this so that I can regain my trust in you stating that your car actually does have "GM cast LT1" heads and intake. That and/or WHY you're LT1 intake is so heavily modified (ie, little sneaky pete action).
Later
Chuck
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...99362750zgEpEj
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by squinn
Fast ecm with opti and a crank trigger.
we had ended up make 581 @ 7200 with a highly modified Lt1 intake on the same short block.
Modern Cylinder Head in the Detroit area did the heads
I do my own intakes.
Fast ecm with opti and a crank trigger.
we had ended up make 581 @ 7200 with a highly modified Lt1 intake on the same short block.
Modern Cylinder Head in the Detroit area did the heads
I do my own intakes.
any specs on the cam numbers or is it secret?
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 83
From: Georgia
flow #'s
what kind of numbers do your heads flow... and could you tell us a little more about your intake. If your cam is a "secret", could you just give us an idea of how big the lift and duration is.... just a clue for us little guys, please
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 296
From: Clawson, MI
Re: flow #'s
Originally posted by Cory1994z28
what kind of numbers do your heads flow... and could you tell us a little more about your intake. If your cam is a "secret", could you just give us an idea of how big the lift and duration is.... just a clue for us little guys, please
what kind of numbers do your heads flow... and could you tell us a little more about your intake. If your cam is a "secret", could you just give us an idea of how big the lift and duration is.... just a clue for us little guys, please
that cam is something like chuck's
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 442
From: Houston, TX
Re: Re: flow #'s
Originally posted by squinn
heads are nothing crazy 276 @ 650 on int and 190 @ 650 exh
that cam is something like chuck's
heads are nothing crazy 276 @ 650 on int and 190 @ 650 exh
that cam is something like chuck's
Later
Chuck
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 296
From: Clawson, MI
back in 97' when I had the heads done I was building the car for NSCA EFI class, this was a factored index class, much diffrent then it is now in the NMCA. I think the AFR had just come out, the heads have worked good, so I stayed with them.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 442
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by squinn
back in 97' when I had the heads done I was building the car for NSCA EFI class, this was a factored index class, much diffrent then it is now in the NMCA. I think the AFR had just come out, the heads have worked good, so I stayed with them.
back in 97' when I had the heads done I was building the car for NSCA EFI class, this was a factored index class, much diffrent then it is now in the NMCA. I think the AFR had just come out, the heads have worked good, so I stayed with them.
Later
Chuck