LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

more fuel needed for a 93 LT1 with a 227/233 comp XE cam?

Old Mar 31, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
sc93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 729
From: Northeast Ohio
Exclamation more fuel needed for a 93 LT1 with a 227/233 comp XE cam?

Would I need an AFPR for my 93 with this cam? Or is the stock fuel supply sufficient?
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
R_Andersen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Long Island, NY
The stock fuel pressure regulator is fine, but you will definately need the computer programmed for that cam. I'm running a 230/236 cam in my 93 and it took some major changes in the VE tables to get it running properly.

-Rob
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #3  
sc93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 729
From: Northeast Ohio
I had Alvin at pcmforless do a tune for me, so I assume everything there was taken care of.

does the programming actually allow the computer to tell it to supply more fuel?
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #4  
speedmiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 823
From: houston, tx
Yep...
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
sc93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 729
From: Northeast Ohio
Originally posted by speedmiser
Yep...
Yep to what? I asked more than one question
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #6  
speedmiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 823
From: houston, tx
I answered the last question you asked...

<<does the programming actually allow the computer to tell it to supply more fuel?>> - Yep...

As far the first - you probably dont need a adjustable fuel regulator, unless you're current fp is to high or low. You can ask your tuner at what fp he turned for, then check to see if that's what you have.
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
sc93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 729
From: Northeast Ohio
Cool, thanks.


my friend insists that I NEED an afpr to bump up my pressure for this cam.
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 04:00 PM
  #8  
RichWhalen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
From: Louisville, KY
I've been tuning a friend's car that has this cam. He has stock heads, but a full exhaust with headers. We are seeing injector duty cycles over 90% above 6200 rpm. This is at stock fuel pressures. It would not hurt to raise your fuel pressure if you are going to stick with the stock injectors.
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 10:19 PM
  #9  
speedmiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 823
From: houston, tx
I'd assumed that if Alvin tuned it, he didnt let the duty rates get to high. Ask him, before you go messing with the fuel pressure. If you do ending up raising the fuel pressure to lower the duty cycle, you're going to need to have him cut a new chip.
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #10  
sc93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 729
From: Northeast Ohio
Originally posted by speedmiser
I'd assumed that if Alvin tuned it, he didnt let the duty rates get to high. Ask him, before you go messing with the fuel pressure. If you do ending up raising the fuel pressure to lower the duty cycle, you're going to need to have him cut a new chip.

Yeah, I'm gonna give him a call tomorrow.
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #11  
justens95z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 73
so then, would you guys think I would need bigger injectors or AFPR for my car with a CC306 cam with stock heads and cold air and big TB and exhaust?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Midwest
0
Nov 21, 2014 09:40 AM
GigaMp3z
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
Feb 20, 2003 02:57 PM
NED4SPD
Site Help and Suggestions
3
Sep 16, 2002 10:45 PM
mjcent922
Car Audio and Electronics
10
Jul 27, 2002 12:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.