Maf Descreen? Majority Vote Wins!
Originally posted by ba96ta
Performance ones are calibrated for no screen from the manufacture
Performance ones are calibrated for no screen from the manufacture
Originally posted by Brent94Z
It has been talked already that it is believed that removing the screen may only give you ~1 hp
It has been talked already that it is believed that removing the screen may only give you ~1 hp
The screen is there to help keep the airflow constant and even across the sensor wire . I might add it also does offer some protection from debre if it should enter the intake track....I have found a small bug or 2 on it before(its not designed with this in mind though)
I do agree that it should be removed for forced air apps.
Originally posted by gb95zconv
Question is....is it worth screwing with your MAF and possibly messing it up for a 1hp gain thats not not going to make a difference on a 1\4 mile run with all other variables considered.
Question is....is it worth screwing with your MAF and possibly messing it up for a 1hp gain thats not not going to make a difference on a 1\4 mile run with all other variables considered.

Originally posted by gb95zconv
The screen is there to help keep the airflow constant and even across the sensor wire . I might add it also does offer some protection from debre if it should enter the intake track....I have found a small bug or 2 on it before(its not designed with this in mind though)
The screen is there to help keep the airflow constant and even across the sensor wire . I might add it also does offer some protection from debre if it should enter the intake track....I have found a small bug or 2 on it before(its not designed with this in mind though)

Originally posted by gb95zconv
I do agree that it should be removed for forced air apps.
I do agree that it should be removed for forced air apps.
I really think this whole thing boils down to this...
1. If you aren't comfortable doing this, then don't do it.
2. If you'd like to try it, try it and if it doesn't work, put it back in.
Originally posted by Dan K
Let me try to understand what you just said.
How is the MAF sensor seeing MORE air when you said it yourself it is unchanneled/unmetered? That means the extra air that is sneaking through gives you more parts of air per the same amount of fuel.
Let me try to understand what you just said.
How is the MAF sensor seeing MORE air when you said it yourself it is unchanneled/unmetered? That means the extra air that is sneaking through gives you more parts of air per the same amount of fuel.
Originally posted by Dan K
I don't think so. You said yourself that it is unmetered air. The maf isn't "measuring" correctly because of the porting.
I don't think so. You said yourself that it is unmetered air. The maf isn't "measuring" correctly because of the porting.
Its not only un-hanneled, but its also caussing MAF read more then its actually going.
Originally posted by Dan K
No, I guess I don't.
No, I guess I don't.
Besides, isn't this where a blm lock comes into play. If you use a blm lock than you have repeatable fueling at wot. O2 input is not used at wot anyways. The computer uses the PE tables...and as long as the blm is locked @ 128...they shouldn't have any effect on your PE. That is the whole point of the lock, isn't it...repeatability? Now I'm off somewhere else...
Maybe I'm wrong on some of the little details...but I'm pretty sure I've got the right idea here.
If you guys want to port and descreen and stuff go ahead...better yet, trade your stock stuff to someone who doesn't want their ported stuff since their car runs poorly with it. [/B][/QUOTE]
Your PE setting comes from your Regular tables. its basically 15% richer, and it uses O2 to get you ideal 12.1 (Max power ratio). Hence if your actall/regular table is screwed up. So you may get richer on lower RPM but too lean at Higher RPM. I hope it clears up the air now
Originally posted by Brent94Z
This confuses me a little. In a forced induction application it is extremely important to make sure everything is working in order and correctly and the sensors report accurate information. So it would seem that if a person thinks the screen should be left alone then they should have even a stronger opinion about leaving it in there for a forced induction application, no?
This confuses me a little. In a forced induction application it is extremely important to make sure everything is working in order and correctly and the sensors report accurate information. So it would seem that if a person thinks the screen should be left alone then they should have even a stronger opinion about leaving it in there for a forced induction application, no?
I do agree that it is a restriction to air flow....but not so much that it hurts an NA app more than 1hp as you have stated you might gain. In a forced air app your gains by removing the screen should be much higher than 1hp. (Im just speaking intuitively here as I have no hard data to back this up) . Im just saying pulling the screen out for 1hp isnt worth it to me....even though some people have had no problems at all. Its nice to see you have some hard data though
. All I can go on is the countless post of people having problems after descreening
Originally posted by Mir Hussain
Your PE setting comes from your Regular tables. its basically 15% richer, and it uses O2 to get you ideal 12.1 (Max power ratio).
Your PE setting comes from your Regular tables. its basically 15% richer, and it uses O2 to get you ideal 12.1 (Max power ratio).
Hence if your actall/regular table is screwed up. So you may get richer on lower RPM but too lean at Higher RPM. I hope it clears up the air now
I still don't understand what you're trying to say about the PE tables...so I give up. That isn't what this thread is about anyways.
To the person that started this thread, opinions are going to vary and everybody has their own. If you want to pull the screen(s) go ahead and do it and see how your car reacts. As Brent said, you can always put them back in.
As far as porting the ends goes, do it if you want or trade your stock ones to someone that doesn't want their ported ends. Easy as that.
i wonder if this web site has a way to contact problem seekers when the problem or situation is conquered. That way the message and all atributes could be erased, relating to it. I will suggest that to the heirarchy. thanks , andy
IMO the MAF sensor is not an area to go looking for extra power. Get headers, CAI, catback, cam... whatever else but leave the MAF alone. You have very 2 crutial elements in a strong running motor... that is spark and fuel. The MAF sensor is what determines how much fuel to supply so why risk screwing it up? So what if you gain 2 hp... its not like you would ever FEEL the difference and on a dyno a 2 hp varience is quite common. But do what you want... its your money you throwing away if you break the MAF, not mine.
Originally posted by Jeffs94Z28
the aftermarket one doesnt ocme with a screen because they save on cost...
the aftermarket one doesnt ocme with a screen because they save on cost...
take it out, careful like everyone else said. dont worry about gas mileage, if you were worried about it in the first place you shouldn't have bought a gas guzzeling V8.
do a search on the topic about reprograming the computer with a different or modified MAF. There is a really interesting thread that is going to (hopefully soon) compare a stock MAF, a ported and de-screened MAF, and a Gran. MAF.


