LTCC vs Delteq
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 92
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
I went with the LTCC. I like the built in rev limiter and adjustable retard built into the box. I also like the idea of a 1 coil per cylinder instead of 1 coil per 2 cylinder(although it probably doesn't make a difference). The bad part is it doesn't come as a complete kit, you have to piece it together, but thats really no biggy.
Either way you can't go wrong. I'd say it really comes down to preference. Good luck though you won't be dissapointed with either.
Either way you can't go wrong. I'd say it really comes down to preference. Good luck though you won't be dissapointed with either.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
The port under the throttle body is the vaccuum port for the PCV valve on 95-up models. 92-93 LT1 intake manifolds didn't have that port underneath the throttle body. As far as "they," there is only one optispark vent hose connected to the side of the intake manifold. The other vent hose is connected to the intake elbow.
He WILL need an extra vaccuum port on his 92 intake if he intends to vent his optispark.
He WILL need an extra vaccuum port on his 92 intake if he intends to vent his optispark.
And yes I have seven LT1/4 92-97 intakes sitting here I know what you are talking about
he does not NEED another port. He just needs to "T" into the EGR port
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 76
From: Arlington, TX
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
One last question, I think Ive learned alot besides which Optispark to run(like whats the part #). Remember I do not have the original one. So if I wanted to buy a replacement unit or get a used one what one do I need to get to then setup up on Delteq.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 862
From: Columbus, IN
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Originally Posted by 92_RSCamaro
One last question, I think Ive learned alot besides which Optispark to run(like whats the part #). Remember I do not have the original one. So if I wanted to buy a replacement unit or get a used one what one do I need to get to then setup up on Delteq.
http://www.gmpartsdirect.com/results...umber=12552426 (95 Timing Chain Cover to run with your Cloyes Double Roller)
http://www.gmpartsdirect.com/results...umber=12555323 (Vent hoses)
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
Well that settles it: the LT1 ECM is what you'll need to go with. The TBI ECM's are only configured to fire 2 injectors instead of 8. It's just going to be more of a challenge getting the LT1 ECM set up to work with all the 92's guages and existing wiring.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/
Highly modified, refined, ultimate C3 ECM. Just get the injector driver upgrade and you can control 8 P&H injectors. The data logging is amazing. Faster rate and more data than an LT1 PCM. And more performance-oriented options, like nitrous control, 2-bar boost control, soft rev limiter and the list goes on. Best part is, you can modify an original TBI ECM (most of them) to get this functionality.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 862
From: Columbus, IN
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Originally Posted by kevm14
Don't be so sure.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/
Highly modified, refined, ultimate C3 ECM. Just get the injector driver upgrade and you can control 8 P&H injectors. The data logging is amazing. Faster rate and more data than an LT1 PCM. And more performance-oriented options, like nitrous control, 2-bar boost control, soft rev limiter and the list goes on. Best part is, you can modify an original TBI ECM (most of them) to get this functionality.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/
Highly modified, refined, ultimate C3 ECM. Just get the injector driver upgrade and you can control 8 P&H injectors. The data logging is amazing. Faster rate and more data than an LT1 PCM. And more performance-oriented options, like nitrous control, 2-bar boost control, soft rev limiter and the list goes on. Best part is, you can modify an original TBI ECM (most of them) to get this functionality.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 862
From: Columbus, IN
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Originally Posted by OneFlyn95z28
To bad it won't control the dash or transmission 
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Re: LTCC vs Delteq
Yeah I guess you'd have to use the stock PCM for the transmission and dash, or something. It WILL do the dash in an 84 crossfire vette 
. But from an engine control standpoint, this setup (called EBL, "embedded lockers"), it's really very good. Everyone who has used it says the engine drives better, smoother, more power, and better mileage. And this is with throttle body.
. But from an engine control standpoint, this setup (called EBL, "embedded lockers"), it's really very good. Everyone who has used it says the engine drives better, smoother, more power, and better mileage. And this is with throttle body.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM
Dave88LX
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
Mar 28, 2004 09:35 AM