LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Lt4 conv., Speed Inc. dyno #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 11:39 AM
  #31  
VINCELEE123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 404
From: KINGWOOD,TX,77339
hehe
ive got the magazine at home, im sure im leaving something else out as well.
let ya know tonight
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #32  
ltlhomer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,373
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Using dynojet's inflated numbers to calculate flywheel numbers is kinda pointless anyways. If you do a conversion based on the weight of my car and trap speed its capable of (let's say 115 mph w/ a 3350 lb car...). Using a trap/hp converter, it would say I have 420 hp. Take my mustang dyno number, divide by .82 and you'll get 426.x. Using a dynojet rwhp number, I would probably end up with 450+ hp at the flywheel, which might seem great but just isn't true.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #33  
BitCypher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 305
From: JoCo KS
Originally posted by ltlhomer
Using dynojet's inflated numbers to calculate flywheel numbers is kinda pointless anyways. If you do a conversion based on the weight of my car and trap speed its capable of (let's say 115 mph w/ a 3350 lb car...). Using a trap/hp converter, it would say I have 420 hp. Take my mustang dyno number, divide by .82 and you'll get 426.x. Using a dynojet rwhp number, I would probably end up with 450+ hp at the flywheel, which might seem great but just isn't true.
Very true, as long as the original quoted 420fwhp was estimated on a dynojet then it's fair to say he reached the quoted FWHP rating. Now, whether or not his 345.6rwhp is correct or not, well that's up to determining which dyno equipment is more accurate. I'd be very interested to dyno my car on a Mustang dyno and compare the results to my dynojet numbers. Good post lt1homer.

EDIT: I would think the trap/hp calculators would be even more unreliable because the trap speed includes things such as driver ability, traction, etc. Why would those matter to FWHP numbers? In the end the only real way is to connect the engine directly up to an engine dyno and run the tests. In the interim I'd trust the dyno to be more accurate than trap times.

Last edited by BitCypher; Aug 5, 2003 at 01:08 PM.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 12:42 PM
  #34  
GigaMp3z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 123
From: Allentown-Quakertown-Whitehall-Pottstown, PA
I think a bigger cam would definately show some better numbers.

-Corey
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 02:24 PM
  #35  
Black_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,540
From: MN,USA
Originally posted by GigaMp3z
I think a bigger cam would definately show some better numbers.

-Corey
No really, a bigger cam would do that?!?!?!
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 05:45 PM
  #36  
jeff gillings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 31
From: Winthrop Harbor Il.
Originally posted by BitCypher
No problem bud, it's real easy to do it the wrong way. Let's see if I can explain it...

Let's say that a V8 motor strapped to an engine dyno pulled 300hp (fwhp). Now let's say that that engine was bolted into a car with an automatic transmission and strapped to a vehicle dyno. What's the estimated RWHP?

Condering that most A4 setups eat approximately 18% of the engine's output (to turn the tranny, drive-shaft, and rear-end) then the approximate RWHP in this case could be calculated by simply asking "What is 82% of 300?":

300 * .82 = ??? [answer = 255]

Cool, 255rwhp for that setup. Okay, but what if you only had the RWHP number (percentage of an unknown 'whole') and wanted to find FWHP (the unknown 'whole')? The approximate FWHP can be found by reversing the above formula (divide each side of the equation by .82) to ask "255 is 82% of what number?":

??? = 255 / .82 [answer = 300]

Note that the INCORRECT question would've been "255 is 118% of what number?". That would give a lower number because 18% of 255 is not equal to 18% of 300; or ".18 * 255 < .18 * 300". Make sense?

So, in summary:

whole * percentage = percentage_of_whole

percentage_of_whole / percentage = whole

Just remember that the engine is the source of all this power, so the engine's FWHP is always the "whole".

Hope this helps!
Thanks for the info, easy to understand. Does anyone know what the largest cam and the part# you can use with stock LT1 pistons.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #37  
jeff gillings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 31
From: Winthrop Harbor Il.
Anyone? on the largest cam with stock LT pistons and how much of a HP gain with the LT4 heads and intake ported.
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 10:15 PM
  #38  
Hotwire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 719
From: Summerfield, NC USA
Originally posted by Chris 96 WS6
I will say those are probably typical or average power numbers for the LT4 conversion, but you could have gotten quite a bit more power by doing a little more research and for the same and maybe a tad less $$.

My mods:
Stock heads ported by Lloyd with 2.00/1.56 valves
XE 224/230 cam, 114LSA, 110ICL
1.6 non-self aligning rockers, guideplates, hardened pushrods
Cmotorsports "618" valvesprings
LT4 extreme duty timing chain
FLP longtubes, cutout
BBK 58mm TB
What kind of money you got tied up in these mods TOTAL compared to the LT4 conversion? I am thinking about going the conversion route and see everyone posting things such as this with no numbers to support their posts.

Porting, valves, springs, retainters, cam, etc etc, if you have a breakdown and total it would benefit me a little better.

Thanks,
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 08:35 AM
  #39  
ltlhomer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,373
From: Metro Detroit, MI
xe230/236 (.544 / .555 w/ 1.6's) $210
Comp. pro mag 1.6's nsa w/ guideplates $270
Stock hardened pushrods
Stock TB
30# svo's (not actually needed...just bought for extra safety. fwiw, dyno runs were done w/ 22 #'s) $250
Used cnc ported stock casting heads $800
Unported stock intake
Spring setup $120 installed
Jet hot hooker lt's $620
Vigi 3000 stall $475 used
True dual setup (parts=180 installation=175)

347.9 rwhp on MD which equates to 380-400 on a dynojet and that's through an auto and a vigi stall.

It has spanked many 02+ 911 tt's, ferrari 360 modenas, non 03 vipers, and of course many other not-as-exciting cars. I probably wouldn't fair so well if we were racing up to 150+ but it's not like you can do that on your typical str...track.

Hope that helps you out...if you have any other questions feel free to email me at LTLHOMER@aol.com. I'm up at college and it can get quite boring. I still want to line up and race this kid with a 409 stroker setup for juice in a 2002 anniv. ss. I know I'll get murdered (n/a pretty bad and w/ n2o super bad) but it's always fun to see fast *** cars getting up on it.
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #40  
30thannZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 515
From: jacksonville, FL
Wow, some really nice and informative posts, guys. I was thinking about doing a full LT4 conversion, but after reading all these posts, I might be better off doing something else. Perhaps you guys can help. I'm looking for between 350-400rwhp, and I have about $3500 to spend. Please take a look at my signature info and see what I already have done and tell me if you guys think I should just get the full LT4 conversion kit or if I should spend teh majority of my $$$ on AFR heads and a nice comp cam. I need some expert help in this field as they are high $$ mods and I want to do it right from the start! Keep in mind, I'm doing the OBD I conversion soon with custom tuning. Thanks everybody.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #41  
Hotwire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 719
From: Summerfield, NC USA
Thanks for all the info guys.

My luck w/ used equipment is pretty bad, let alone w/ new stuff. I went ahead and dropped a bomb on the LT4 conversion from summit. I live 20 minutes from gm parts direct, and they won't let you counter pickup, and no phone number to contact for support, so i gladly sent my $ to summit. Should be on my door step today, can't wait. I'm also doing the vented opti conversion while I'm at it, getting rid of all the little things while the wife is still in shock.

Got 30# SVO injectors, my old injectors got clogged to the hilt w/ rust from the stock S-10 fuel line sitting out in the open for a couple of months. Got new aluminum line to run to the motor, BBK 52mm TB, and taylor over the valve cover wire conversion.

Hopefully will have it back on the road in 2-3 weeks pending I don't find anything major when I finally get the pass. side head off.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #42  
a_z28_vance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 190
From: Collinsville/Maryville IL
My dyno and track times are in the sig. My heads probably flow a little less than stock lt4s. IMO, I would feel much safer with the 30# injectors, that is why I use them.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 03:07 PM
  #43  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Originally posted by 30thannZ28
...looking for between 350-400rwhp, and I have about $3500 to spend. Please take a look at my signature info and see what I already have done and tell me if you guys think I should just get the full LT4 conversion kit or if I should spend teh majority of my $$$ on AFR heads and a nice comp cam.

If you do get AFR heads, DO NOT HAVE AFR PORT THEM! Send them out to someone reputable from this list. Also, if you're going to go with AFR heads, why not pick up an LT4 intake for cheap, and then you can order a set of AFR LT4 heads, which will give you a little more potential. This is what I plan on doing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve69SS396
Track Kill Stories
15
Aug 10, 2015 02:45 PM
KYWes
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Apr 3, 2015 07:59 PM
racecarz28
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Mar 30, 2015 09:55 PM
87Aerocoupe
Forced Induction
6
Mar 20, 2015 01:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.