Lloyd Elliott Flow #'s are in
Registered User
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I went with the LE2 cam because PCMforLess is better at tuning it. Its also still pretty good for a daily driver. Good for mid 11s all day long in a 350. We'll find out how it does in a 383 very shortly...
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 573
From: Just outside of "D-town"
Originally posted by Gripenfelter
I went with the LE2 cam because PCMforLess is better at tuning it. Its also still pretty good for a daily driver. Good for mid 11s all day long in a 350. We'll find out how it does in a 383 very shortly...
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
I went with the LE2 cam because PCMforLess is better at tuning it. Its also still pretty good for a daily driver. Good for mid 11s all day long in a 350. We'll find out how it does in a 383 very shortly...
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
It idles like THAT in a 383!!!....HOLY CRAP lol..what are the specs on the LE1 2 3?...
Registered User
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 58
From: Chicago, IL
Just for comparison, my exhaust on iron impy heads from Lloyd flowed as follows with the stock valve (1.50):
.100 49
.200 108
.300 144
.400 170
.500 183
.550 187
.600 189
The iron head has a great exhaust! I'm surprised the 1.5 valve flowed so close to the 1.56 though! Some of it must be the back cut Lloyd uses.
My intake though was 253@.500 and 257@.600 with the stock valve (1.94), so the 2.00 trounced me there. The mid numbers were closer:
.200 133
.300 190
.400 234
Don't mean to steal your thread. It's just an interesting comparison.
BTW, Nice numbers!
.100 49
.200 108
.300 144
.400 170
.500 183
.550 187
.600 189
The iron head has a great exhaust! I'm surprised the 1.5 valve flowed so close to the 1.56 though! Some of it must be the back cut Lloyd uses.
My intake though was 253@.500 and 257@.600 with the stock valve (1.94), so the 2.00 trounced me there. The mid numbers were closer:
.200 133
.300 190
.400 234
Don't mean to steal your thread. It's just an interesting comparison.
BTW, Nice numbers!
Last edited by ImpySS; May 21, 2004 at 09:57 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 753
From: Chandler AZ
I that true that Joe Overton is doing the cams for Lloyd Elliot?
Grip,
did you have another cam before that one and if so how much did you pick up with it?
Just curious I have one of Joe's Solid Roller cams on the way and had my LT4 heads and intake were ported by his guy too.
Grip,
did you have another cam before that one and if so how much did you pick up with it?
Just curious I have one of Joe's Solid Roller cams on the way and had my LT4 heads and intake were ported by his guy too.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 691
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally posted by Gripenfelter
I went with the LE2 cam because PCMforLess is better at tuning it. Its also still pretty good for a daily driver. Good for mid 11s all day long in a 350. We'll find out how it does in a 383 very shortly...
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
I went with the LE2 cam because PCMforLess is better at tuning it. Its also still pretty good for a daily driver. Good for mid 11s all day long in a 350. We'll find out how it does in a 383 very shortly...
Next year I might step up to an LE3 next year if I get the right datalogging software to tune it with PCMforLess.
Hi how much hp did you pull out with the head and cams?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formula Steve
LT1 Based Engine Tech
45
Sep 19, 2023 08:31 AM
camaro02DK
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 5, 2015 09:24 AM