LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Let's talk about valves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 01:31 PM
  #1  
OutKast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 425
From: Lakeland, FL
Let's talk about valves

Alright, the heads are off the car and I am going to be increasing the valve size to the 2.02,1.60 setup. Now, which valves are recommended? Just looking through my Summit catalogue I can see that there are several options mostly related to weight and flow. Some are undercut,backcut, tuliped, sodium filled....what does all this mean and at what would I want to stay away from for a street car running in the mid-low 11s.

What does cutting the valve do for you...3 angle,5 angle and so forth?
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #2  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Im going to jump in here too....

What is the best valve you can buy within reason.... I know there are pro-flo, severe duty, race mod (making these names up but valve guys know what i mean)....
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #3  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Titanium!!!!!

Actually, I believe there's something about undercutting the 2.02's to get them to seat right. As for which valve you want, Ferrea, Manley, and LT4's are always a good choice.
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #4  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally posted by Fastbird93
Titanium!!!!!
Within reason was a qualifier
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #5  
llafro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 408
From: West Coast
How about unobtanium? I haven't the foggiest, so TTT for you...

BRAD
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 03:11 PM
  #6  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Originally posted by atljar
Within reason was a qualifier
Oh but how nice they'd be. Of course, I'd need to have a motor that could actually utilize the weight advantages. Yeah frikkin right. Not in my lifetime!!!
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 04:26 PM
  #7  
SVT Killer LV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 852
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
I have the Manley Race Flo 2.00/1.56 Valves on my car.. I like them
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #8  
OutKast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 425
From: Lakeland, FL
Well, I was given the links below on my local forum and they pretty well explain the different angles of the cuts but I'm still wondering about the different types of valves...

http://realbig.com/detomaso/1998-10/102.html

5 angle valve job http://flag.blackened.net/mopar/fig25.jpg
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #9  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Well, the sodium filled jobbies are probably the LT4 valves. The hollowness would make them lighter and the sodium (may be to keep them cooler)?

Undercut valves would be lighter and the undercut (where the stem is narrowed under the valve head) should make them flow more.

Tulip is probably just an undercut valve.

Serious Duty valves probably are not undercut since that would probably make them less strong.

Now you know as much (or little) as I do.

I have the Manley Race Flow undercut 2" 1.56s.

I liked the idea of the increased flow capablity and didn't believe that I needed the Serious Duty valves for a Street/Strip application. avlesve thn
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #10  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Then again. I have heard of "tulip" valves (valves with dished heads) but didn't know there was an advantage, other than perhaps being a little lighter and providing larger combustion area.

On the other hand "tuliping" of valves usually means that excessive heat has caused the valves to become tulip like, i.e., the metal becomes soft and the valves sealing tends to pull the valve making the face dished and elongating the valve itself.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #11  
amean94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
i just got the pro flo's and i would not have skimped on them either $148.00 is a very good price and the best you can get ( for our motors)
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #12  
amean94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
Originally posted by S.J.S.
So do I. I'm surprised no one has mentioned this, but the biggest you'd wanna go on stock heads are 2.00 and 1.56. Did a lot of research on this when I ported and polished my heads. I chatted with Phil and LLoyd and both informed me of that. You wont get anything out of going any bigger because the combustion chamber on the stock heads aren't condusive to any larger sixed valves.
wrong! its nice that all these guys took there time to write articles for you to read but 2.02 1.60 are optinum for us lt'1 we own a machine shop and can prove this....................... wait you said stock heads meaning no work done to them than its true but not if they are "worked" as in combustion chambers, unshrouding the valves, p&p,injector move as what has been done with my heads

Last edited by amean94ta; Nov 26, 2003 at 06:11 PM.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #13  
Tibbys96Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 134
From: Norman, Oklahoma
Lloyd recommended the 2.02/1.6 for me. Worked heads.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #14  
amean94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
fighting on the internet is like the special olyimpics...........even if you win you are still retarded
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:12 PM
  #15  
amean94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
yeah sorry bout that posetd before i read throughly............................. as for you two other guys shut the hell up already



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.