Kooks vs. Hookers -- a side-by-side comparison with pics
"Slow and da curious" made a thread asking what the best LT1 header was. I figured that I would post up some pics since I haven't any threads that show a set of Hookers and Kooks side-by-side.
First, let's look at the headers by themselves. The Kooks (bottom) are new 1-3/4" emissions models. The Hookers (top) have a few thousand miles on them.

Next, let's see how the headers look side-by-side when held in position by their Y-pipes. The Hookers are using a Mufflex Y, which I bought before Hooker came out with their LT1-specific Y-pipe. Notice the difference in the plug access between the headers, and how the primaries are routed symmetrically.

Finally, let's compare the Kooks Y with the Mufflex.

Lastly, I should mention that although I'm a Kooks convert, I have to admit that the Hookers still cleaned up beautifully thanks to the JetHot lifetime warranty:

Thoughts?
First, let's look at the headers by themselves. The Kooks (bottom) are new 1-3/4" emissions models. The Hookers (top) have a few thousand miles on them.

Next, let's see how the headers look side-by-side when held in position by their Y-pipes. The Hookers are using a Mufflex Y, which I bought before Hooker came out with their LT1-specific Y-pipe. Notice the difference in the plug access between the headers, and how the primaries are routed symmetrically.

Finally, let's compare the Kooks Y with the Mufflex.

Lastly, I should mention that although I'm a Kooks convert, I have to admit that the Hookers still cleaned up beautifully thanks to the JetHot lifetime warranty:

Thoughts?
I have always liked the quality of the Kooks and as far has headers go they are awesome. I still like that Mufflex Y pipe setup, not so much the equal routing cause that can cause contact issues with the underbody, but the Y merge is a better setup.

Bret

Bret
Hooker's are equal length... but the Kook's sure don't appear to be (which allows for that better plug access IMO)... how does that come into play with things?
I think we've seen a few posts where the Kook's have made more power though.
I think we've seen a few posts where the Kook's have made more power though.
Those Kooks aren't and not everyone likes stepped headers... as for equal length about the only people who can find the difference are Cup teams... the Kooks make more power most likely due to the smoother design, with less hard bends in them.
Bret
Bret
..and the spike collectors
Nice side-by-side comparison trax. Appreciate the info. Now you have successfully added even more doubt to which header I should go with. 
While we're at it, what's the advantages of the "elbow" I keep hearing people mention. I'm assuming it goes into the throttle body but please bear with me. My other car is a mid 10's '70 Camaro bracket car. Last time I checked, it didn't have a throttle body, so just excuse the ignorance. Thanks again.
'97 A4 WS6 Trans Am
3.73's only...so far
'70 Camaro
383 Stroker - 625 hp - Eagle forged rotating assembly - Wiseco domes - Brodix track 1's - 750 Race Demon - .678 lift Comp Cam - 14 to 1 comp. No juice, No boost

While we're at it, what's the advantages of the "elbow" I keep hearing people mention. I'm assuming it goes into the throttle body but please bear with me. My other car is a mid 10's '70 Camaro bracket car. Last time I checked, it didn't have a throttle body, so just excuse the ignorance. Thanks again.
'97 A4 WS6 Trans Am
3.73's only...so far
'70 Camaro
383 Stroker - 625 hp - Eagle forged rotating assembly - Wiseco domes - Brodix track 1's - 750 Race Demon - .678 lift Comp Cam - 14 to 1 comp. No juice, No boost
Last edited by slow and da curious; Oct 27, 2006 at 04:13 PM.
Just to add to this, you can also get a Kooks Y-pipe with a 4" outlet. I just had my Kooks installed and they are great. I gained at least 1" of ground clearance over the Hookers. Great post and comparison--thanks.


