LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

How much power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #1  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
How much power?

I've thought that I change a bit my engine setup...
How much should I expect power with this kind on setup, from the engine:
Ported LT1 heads, flow 520hp
comp cams 467 cam
hedman longtube headers
30lb/hr injectors
Intake ported and matched to heads
MSD 6al
52x2 TB
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
Originally Posted by MrCamu
Ported LT1 heads, flow 520hp
What?

I'm going to guess ~375 rwhp.
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #3  
Wild1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,277
From: Orange Kounty, Kalifornia
I ran a similar set up with a 466 and got 360 rwhp. A 467 would get about 20 more. On an AT that's approx 440 at the fly more or less.
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
The XFI stuff is GROSSLY overrated, the rpm ranges published are drastically lower than reality and if you use the recommended springs you WILL have valvetrain control issues maybe not immediately but it will happen too soon.

Lots of things play into the rpm range of a cam BUT a properly spec'd cam of less duration with the right valvetrain should let you use all the pcm's capability and more than should be done on a stock shortblock rpm wise.
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #5  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
I have crane 99846-16 valve spring set in the engine
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #6  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
That spring wont even come close to controling that cam, doubt it would control even the samller XFI lobes.

I am NOT saying it is a bad spring, just saying it is not appropriate for these lobes.

Realitically I think you should have a longer valve to give you the option of running more spring.
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #7  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
Ok, so what springs you suggest?
And what do you mean that it wont control it?
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
The XFI lobes were designed specifically with the beehive springs in mind, BUT the 918 beehive Comp recommends will give up after far too short a time period because Comp's rpm range is much lower than reality. The extra RPM will be more demanding and wear them out..

By "wont control it" I mean the lifter will get thrown off the nose of the lobe and the valve will bounce off the seat when it closes, both conditions are called "valve float" some classes of racing use the throwing the lifter off the nose of the cam to increase effective lift without having a high lift cam, BUT it is hard on parts, bouncing the valve off the seat hurts power because a valve is open when it should be closed.

I really could not tell you what spring you should use, going to depend on your valves weight/length and just how high in rpms you need to take that cam with the rest of your setup.
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #9  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
Beehive springs, retainers, locks and id/od locators ordered...
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #10  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by MrCamu
Beehive springs, retainers, locks and id/od locators ordered...
To use with what cam? You were given some solid advice by 96capricemgr, and I hope you took it seriously.
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #11  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
Comp 467
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 02:49 PM
  #12  
jay_rich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 811
From: Windsor, ON Canada
i had the simalar setup in my iroc when i first go it

355 lt1 (stock bored .030)
Ported heads
Ported and rasied runner intake
52mm tb
30# accels
Hot cam kit
1 5/8 shorties


I put down 315/315 RWHP thru a 4l60e 3000stall

Jay
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #13  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Which springs did you order?
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #14  
MrCamu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 36
From: Finland
Comp 26918-16
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
Keenan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
10
Jan 19, 2023 12:24 PM
DarkKnight
Exhaust System
19
Oct 17, 2016 10:28 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
May 16, 2015 03:40 PM
XtremeLt1
Car Audio and Electronics
12
Sep 13, 2002 08:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.