LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

High mileage and moderate cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #1  
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,595
From: Lenexa, KS
High mileage and moderate cam?

I'm curious to see what your guys mileages are and when you put the cam in your LT1. Looking for people with higher (125-175k miles) on stock bottom ends.

Been thinking about trying to squeeze a moderate cam in my LT1 next fall, wondering if I'll regret it if I don't rebuild the bottom end.

The car is a 1997 Camaro SS - 155k miles, driven maybe 2k miles/year. Mods can be found on my fquick but basically Pacesetter LTs, 3" ORY, SLP 2OTL, 52mm TB, some suspension, etc. I was told that the previous owner replaced the front crank seal, water pump gaskets, rear pinion seal, and a few other things around 135k miles. I replaced the valve cover gaskets at about 142k.

Would like to go with something around a Ai 226/234 @ 110 LSA. Also considered the idea of going with a LT4 hotcam and keeping the stock rev limiter to prevent myself from tearing up the bottom end. Worried that if I do that I'll regret not going bigger for the amount of work done for the swap.

Would love to see people post what cam they went with, mileage they put it in at, and how it's held up.

Last edited by 6SpdLT1Z; Mar 12, 2012 at 02:59 PM.
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
mrmint69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,731
From: Post Falls, Idaho
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

Reading the threads on here years ago, I decided it was to risky. I noticed a lot of the problem is that the cam was installed wrong or caused issued later on. Lots of people ended up with a spun bearing or other issues.
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #3  
ACE1252's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,068
From: Kernersville, NC
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

I put my CC503 in at 98,000. A year later I changed the bearings. Not for any of them failing or even for low oil pressure. I had 25-30psi at idle with them. I was working on an oil pressure loss issue between 3500-5000rpms and happen to find a minor issue with the #1 main(speculation that glass bead from the factory went through it). I decided at that point to change all the bearings in the motor. Spent more to do it myself than to have a shop do it, but I learned a ton. The pressure loss during high rpm was an oil pan and pickup problem.

I've got 105,000 now.

Last edited by ACE1252; Mar 12, 2012 at 07:14 PM.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #4  
2QUIK6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,937
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

Is it a 6M or A4 trans? The 226/234 may be ok for the 6M and a little too much if for an A4 to get tuned correctly without it surging gears and TC stall also come into play.
I bought a cam from a friend that worked great in his 383 but was way too big for my stock bottom end, would have to spin it past 6k to make good power. Now have the lpe211/219 still with stock bottom end and it makes way more usable power on the street. Had LE1.5 heads with both cams. Has 131k on the rotating assembly.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:40 PM
  #5  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

If you want to keep the stock rev limiter you are looking at WAY too much cam.

A friend put a cam in his cop car at 160K these days the engine is in his wife's daily driver with something like 240K on it. He id the AI cam that is about the same size as the HOT and since it is an iron head motor with tall guides it has 1.52 rockers works great.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 07:56 PM
  #6  
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,595
From: Lenexa, KS
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

Originally Posted by 2QUIK6
Is it a 6M or A4 trans? The 226/234 may be ok for the 6M and a little too much if for an A4 to get tuned correctly without it surging gears and TC stall also come into play.
M6, I'm not worried about the cam being too much for driving, I'm worried about it being too much for a 154k mi bottom end.

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
If you want to keep the stock rev limiter you are looking at WAY too much cam.
I'd be upping the rev limiter if I went with the AI. I realize it'll want to run up a lot higher than the hotcam.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 08:23 PM
  #7  
maybe2fast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 889
From: Commerce, MI
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

The cam itself isn't going to hurt the bottom end, its the driving and reving too high. I had/have a bottom end with a cc503 for 20k installed at 100k and now at 120k ts getting a cc306
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 10:36 PM
  #8  
2QUIK6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,937
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

Originally Posted by 6SpdLT1Z
M6, I'm not worried about the cam being too much for driving, I'm worried about it being too much for a 154k mi bottom end.
You will when you have to spin it well past what the stocker can handle to make any usable power.
Old Mar 14, 2012 | 09:07 PM
  #9  
lt11997's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 502
From: Fargo,ND
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

Put my hotcam in at 95000 mi. has 120,000 now along with the stock cam bearings and still going strong.
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 10:10 AM
  #10  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

110LSA on a 226/234 cam is NOT a tight LSA. People just think it is because cam companies grind cams on wide LSAs to account for the average guy choosing too much duration.

Cam Lobe Centerline - Tech, Overview, Explanation - Hot Rod

I have direct experience with that cam in a Caprice with 3.42s.
I have experience with other cams ranging from 218 intake duration on a 107lsa up to 228 intake duration on 108, the latter would be a bit annoying to drive with something like 3.42 or numerically lower in a big heavy Caprice but give it 3.73s and an appropriate stall and it is fine.


Those who "believe" in 112+ for an NA 350 are pretty much stuck in the past.

If you read the above linked article he is talking about using a 265degree at .050" duration cam on a 107LSA being about ideal in a 355, now that is flat tappet with a 4barrel intake so there are a lot of differences and this is all out race. When you look at that, consider we are talking 30degrees less duration and still going wider on the LSA.

These custom 108/110 LSA cams that are pretty popular these days are setup for the stree, and the 112-114 LSA you see in Comp's catalog is just silly. There can be cases made for it like emissions, turbo, or large nitrous shot, or even sometimes for larger engines.
Lunati's VooDoo line has several cam ground on a 110.
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 06:34 AM
  #11  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: High mileage and moderate cam?

I don't know every spec on my cam, but I do know that with the AI 228 cam on a 108 the vacuum is adequate for my brakes and that the Caprice brakes are a bit undersized. 4200lbs car with brakes that clear 15" wheels. Add some HP and front rotors start heat checking pretty quickly.
I know to convert to 4.75" pattern guys use 1LE rotors so I would imagine that means the rotors are the same basic dimensions as the f-body but with more weight to stop.
This cam makes power at least to the pcm's limits so I would agree for most stock shortblock stuff keep the duration a little shorter which that alone would reduce overlap plus if you went 109-110 you are still closer to optimal but still now way out at 112+.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rideordie
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
Nov 5, 2019 04:52 PM
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
The Seer
Classic Engine Tech
2
Nov 26, 2014 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.