LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Help with picking a cam for a 383.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #1  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
Help with picking a cam for a 383.

I'm building a 383 for the sole purpose of drag racing period. I don't care about anything other than making the most power the most efficently for the money I have to spend. Now with that said I'll give the lowdown on the combo so far. I have a forged rotating assembly which consist of 6in H beam rods, eagle 4340 crank, and JE flattop pistons that are suppose to yield a 12 to 1 CR. The heads are factory LT1's that have been ported a polished and flow 270@ .600 int and 227@ .600 approx. I don't have the flow sheet in front of me, and a ported LT1 intake. I will be using the GM PCM for the time being and want a cam that will peak around 6600-6700 rpm. I had first thought about going soild roller, but since I won't be able to spin past 7000 right yet I was considering going hyd roller. Give me your opinion on what might work for me, oh and by the way this is what I am considering.
Soild Roller 248/254/.606/.612 110ls 106 int CL.

Randy
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #2  
reamo04's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
talk to bret about a custom grind
to make the most power for a drag-only car, your best bet would be a solid roller though
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
irishz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 269
From: central NJ
talk to Lloyd elliot, i just had a Le4 cam ground for my 383. not sure how it is yet. i just got the motor back yesterday.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:34 AM
  #4  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
I discussed this with my engine builder at great length and I think we've decided to go with a 236/242 .602/.608 with 1.6's 112 LS.

Randy
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #5  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
Why 112 lobe sep?

If it's strictly for drag and driveablity is no issue, why not get some more power and goto a 110 or even a 108 LS?
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 09:52 AM
  #6  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by rje
I discussed this with my engine builder at great length and I think we've decided to go with a 236/242 .602/.608 with 1.6's 112 LS.

Randy
Is that a solid or hyd. roller cam?
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #7  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
It's a soild, and a 110 LS was what I had intented to run. I have alot of confidence in my engine builder and he has alot of experience with soild roller 383 LT1's, and besides if it's not right I'll just have to change it.

Randy
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
So is this cam going to peak at 6600-6700 in your 383? Just curious for future reference.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #9  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
It should peak around 6500 or so and I'll probably shift it at 6700. Once I get it built and dynoed I'll post the powerband.

Randy
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #10  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
Thats what the GM 847 does in my stroker, shift point wise anyway.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #11  
Sweetred95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
From: High Ridge, MO
Originally Posted by WS Sick
Why 112 lobe sep?
That's exactly what I was going to ask.

Originally Posted by rje
...I think we've decided to go with a 236/242 .602/.608 with 1.6's 112 LS.
I would think you'd want a bigger cam for an all-out race car.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
I may go bigger once I can afford a DFI, shaft rocker, and a killer set of aftermarket heads, but for right now I'm going to go with this recomendation because in six years he's never steered me wrong and I've won alot of races and championships.

Randy
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #13  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
i was thinking the same thing as SweetRedta, I'd go to more cam with a SR as well since that SR is about the same size as your Joe O hyd cam.

Bret
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #14  
rje's Avatar
rje
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 535
From: Engelhard, N.C.
Well it's a footbrake car and I only run the 1/8, so we're trying to make TQ and we feel we can do it better with a smaller cam. As for the 112 LS I was always told you really didn't need to go much narrower than that especially with factory EFI.

Randy
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #15  
T/A KID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 969
From: Arkansas
As for the 112 LS I was always told you really didn't need to go much narrower than that especially with factory EFI.
You Heard wrong



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.