LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Help with low vaccuum readings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
SSkindog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Help with low vaccuum readings?

Still trying to troubleshoot why our heads/cam/headers combo has been such a failure.
Vaccuum reading at idle is about 12 -13 inches. TPIS says the ZZ9 cam should yield 17 to 20 inches at idle.

Could the EGR valve be causing the vaccuum loss? I have checked all the hoses and routing for vaccuum leaks.

What about the PCV valve? Why is that thing routed so strange? the holes in the manifold are a couple inches apart, and just a short arc of tubing between them. I am used to seeing a PCV valve go from and intake port, over to a valve cover. Is th second hole in the intake routed to the crankcase in the lifter valley?

Any ideas?
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I'd be very surprised to see 20"Hg out of a ZZ9. Stock LT1 cam will only yield 20-21"Hg. 12"Hg does seem exceedingly low. Could be in part due to poor tuning... throttle blades need to be too far open to keep it idling.

EDIT: another thought, are the valves adjusted correctly?

The ports in the intake manifold are routed to allow the PCV valve to pull from the bottom of the intake manifold, directly over the lifter valley, and to discharge into the plenum. There is a sheet metal baffle bolted to the bottom of the intake to keep oil out of the valve. The u-bend tube is only a 93/94 thing... later models use a port on the front of the intake, under the TB for the connection.

Last edited by Injuneer; Jun 25, 2003 at 11:45 AM.
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 12:06 PM
  #3  
SSkindog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Thanks for the info, Fred. It seemed like that was the only logical way that PCV could work.

The valves were adjusted by the fellow who did the wrenching on the H/C install for us. He says he used the old method of "adjusting the adjacent valve, when the other is opened". Gave a half turn past zero lash with that method.

I am thinking that we may pull the valve covers and use the TDC #1, then 180 Deg, #6 TDC method, with 1/4 turn past zero.

We installed Harland Sharp 1.5 RR as part of the mods. These are std SBC items. I have had prior exp with AFR heads, and question whether or not we might need longer pushrods too.........

I have a OBD1 cable coming, and am going to run some scans soon. But I doubt we are gonna pick up all the gains we are missing with these mods from just PCM tuning/Troubleshooting.
However, I would be very happy if that could be the root cause.

I checked static compression, and have 180 psi. Fuel pump pressure is fairly steady at 50 psi, during road testing. Plugs look nice and clean. this should be an easy 12 second car, not a high 13's , with these mods
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 12:09 PM
  #4  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Are you sure there isn't an intake manifold leak?

Do you know how to check for this?
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #5  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Once you get LT1 edit up and running, play with the closed throttle spark advance (idle advance). Adding a few degrees at idle will usually stabilize the idle and increase vacuum. Not sure if that's the only problem you have or if there are performance issues, but assuming there's not a vacuum leak that is a way to increase your idle stability.
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 12:36 PM
  #6  
SSkindog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Originally posted by Gripenfelter
Are you sure there isn't an intake manifold leak?

Do you know how to check for this?
I havent ruled out an intake manifold leak yet. Is that a common occurence on LT1's?
I dont hear a leak. I dont see oil burning which might indicate a leak on the underside of the manifold.

Would one spray some sort of combustible fluid around edges of manifold with engine runnig, and look for rpm increase? Or is there a better way?

would the engine tend to run rich with a vaccuum leak?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
edman
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
6
Mar 13, 2015 09:39 PM
David Dorris
Fuel and Ignition
1
Jan 17, 2015 08:10 PM
AlaskaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
Jan 1, 2015 12:30 PM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 16, 2002 07:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.