LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Help build 396

Old Jul 13, 2003 | 06:34 AM
  #1  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Help build 396

Looking to build a 396 fully forged.

Current setup:

Strong running LT1 with stock ported heads ( Int 194 neck down Ex 160 SS valves) (no flow numbers), intake and cam (xe 224/236 114lsa w/1.6rr)58mm tb. 30lb SVO inj, GSS340M pump, Hooker LTs 2 1/2" true duals. (383rwhp/340rwtq) M6 342 1.8 60ft 8.2 1/8 12.7 @ 110 more in it just scard to grenade the rear + driver error

Love the setup just looking for more.

Plan of attack:

Try and keep it short and to the point.

Build the 396 forged and use my stock ported heads for now.
Get a good size cam for later (AFR heads 220cc, n2o or blower ATI D1SC 14 - 16#)but install now N/A power.

Looking to get into the 11s or more n/a and spray a small 100 shot to go quicker, until I can save for the blower and fuel system.

This is not a daily driver and would be willing to do solid roller, for more HP. Looking to see around 430HP on the low to about 470 w/heads??? CR 9.1 N/A

Looking for 4bolt main bare block.

Have ordered the forged eagle (I think) 396 crank, forged rods (not sure on size) and JE/SRP forged pistons. sorry local engine builder helping with that part.

Cam: looking at the CC ex 248/254 .562/.580 114lsa 4 degrees adv springs to support.

Max rpm 6500?? at this rpm should I say hydro?

Boy is this a bunch of loaded questions... heheh

Always value your inputs and Thanks!
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 07:49 AM
  #2  
slopokrodrigez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,275
The only problem I see with possibly changing heads later is using the new bottom end with old heads. I'm assuming the pistons you're planning on with the 396 build will be matched to the final heads you use as far as CR goes. What will it be temporarily with the stock heads? Will this have an adverse effect on performance? Or are you planning on changing pistons again? By the way use the longest rods possible. Gives your pistons a much longer life. Less side loading.
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 08:11 AM
  #3  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally posted by slopokrodrigez
By the way use the longest rods possible. Gives your pistons a much longer life. Less side loading.
A blower and/or nitrous with a 3.875 stroke kinda limits how long a rod is practical. You might want to consider a piston compression height (CH) well over an inch for the high cylinder pressures. 6 inch rods only give you about 1.06 CH with a 9.00 decked block.

5.85 gives about 1.212 which should help the blower pistons live.

My $.02
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 08:49 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Listen to the Old Stroker! I also prefer short rods for a SC or nitrous setup. These motors develop huge cylinder pressures and the ring lands need to be beefy to support the ring package. It's also my opinion that a shorter rod is beneficial at decreasing the chance of detonation. By moving the piston away from TDC faster, peak cylinder pressure is less and the chance of detonation is decreased. This latter effect is probably small, and I really can't quantify it, but I believe it is real.

For a 3.75" stroke (383), use a 5.7" rod, for a 3.875" stroke (396) a 5.85" sounds good. The rod ratio is somewhat extreme, but there have been thousands of motors built with these sorts of ratios that work fine. OTOH, if I were building a high revving NA motor, I would use a a 6" rod or longer. The lighter pistons, among many other characteristics of a long rod motor, are a big advantage here.

Rich Krause
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 12:46 PM
  #5  
badass383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 270
I have a 3.750 stroke and 6" rods and still have a CH of 1.125. With a 26cc inverted dish I have a CR of 9.4. Long rods are better, sorry guys.
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 08:44 PM
  #6  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Thanks for the info on the rod ratio, as Im not sure on what rod to get.... (leaving it to my local engine builder) that stuff is way above me.

Does any one know what the stock head chamber cc is? I'm trying to get the CR around 9:1

Moreboost
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 04:04 AM
  #7  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
anyone?
Old Oct 3, 2003 | 11:43 PM
  #8  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Well bad news my local shop said they had a 4bolt bare block and it turns out its not!

Does anyone have one sitting around? Is the 2bolt block strong enough to handle the boost?

Thanks again
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 06:55 AM
  #9  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by moreboost
Well bad news my local shop said they had a 4bolt bare block and it turns out its not!

Does anyone have one sitting around? Is the 2bolt block strong enough to handle the boost?

Thanks again
Converting a 2-bolt to a 4-bolt block is a basic operation. Any decent shop should be able to do it. You want to upgrade the main caps anyway, even if the original block is 4-bolt, so in either case new caps have to be fitted and the mains need to be align honed.

Rich Krause
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #10  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally posted by rskrause
Converting a 2-bolt to a 4-bolt block is a basic operation. Any decent shop should be able to do it. You want to upgrade the main caps anyway, even if the original block is 4-bolt, so in either case new caps have to be fitted and the mains need to be align honed.

Rich Krause
My local shop is quoting $500.00 for parts and labor, does that sound like to much?

would a two bolt hold up?
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 07:11 AM
  #11  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by moreboost
My local shop is quoting $500.00 for parts and labor, does that sound like to much?

would a two bolt hold up?
Depends on what parts they are using. A good set of steel main caps can run in the ~$250 range. You need a 4-bolt setup for what you are proposing.

Rich Krause
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 09:16 PM
  #12  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally posted by rskrause
Depends on what parts they are using. A good set of steel main caps can run in the ~$250 range. You need a 4-bolt setup for what you are proposing.

Rich Krause
Ok thats what I was thinking. Hmm will I'm in hawaii so finding a block and shipping to Hawaii and shop work..... ACK!

ebay maybe? hehe

There is a bad block at the shop now, I think the block has a bad cylinder, scored... Should I take a chance on it? The guy want $400.00 for the block or $600.00 with heads........
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 09:49 PM
  #13  
TreySpeed's Avatar
On permanent vacation
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 520
From: Michigan is a decent state.
Do one thing, do it right, do it well.

NA, NA + nitorus or supercharged. No cross breeding. You'll end with a retard.


for a blower i am thinking 8.5:1 on the street.

NA i'm thinking around 12:1


this is dependant upon the gas you have available and the cam you choose of coarse
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #14  
jonaddis84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,639
From: Toledo, OH
One thing i noticed is your cam choice as of now, if you only want to spin it to 6500, which 6700 is pretty much the most you want to spin a hyrdaulic roller without a hydra rev kit. Anyway, that cam with that much duration is going to make peak power wellll above 7000, which the rotating assembly will handle it, but the valvetrain wont. Id say go for a cam in the low to mid 230s on the intake and low 240s on the exhaust side. that will peak out at around 6500 or 6600, still well in the hydraulic roller range, just get some springs with goood pressure and that can handle at least .6" of lift.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 12:14 AM
  #15  
moreboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally posted by jonaddis84
One thing i noticed is your cam choice as of now, if you only want to spin it to 6500, which 6700 is pretty much the most you want to spin a hyrdaulic roller without a hydra rev kit. Anyway, that cam with that much duration is going to make peak power wellll above 7000, which the rotating assembly will handle it, but the valvetrain wont. Id say go for a cam in the low to mid 230s on the intake and low 240s on the exhaust side. that will peak out at around 6500 or 6600, still well in the hydraulic roller range, just get some springs with goood pressure and that can handle at least .6" of lift.
Moving more to the side of solid roller, 6500rpm maybe 7000 but I dont thing so.... If I can get to where I need to be at a lower rpm all the better....

Cams lsa is 114 and 4 degrees adv for this cam..... I hope that will lower the power band in the correct range.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM.