LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Guy doing machine work says springs that come with HOTcam kit may not work??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Guy doing machine work says springs that come with HOTcam kit may not work??

Just got a call from the guy doing my head work/assembly saying that the LT4 springs may not give adequate seat pressure........ He was asking if I had a cam card for it, and I told him that I didn't think it came with one. Can anyone help me on what specs he would need?? I know some people think that these springs are marginal for the cam, but I'm not planning on revving the motor past 6........ I'm tired of chasing parts but holy ****. This is ridiculous. I'll probably ask him to install the springs anyway, and if he won't do it I'll find someone who will.

But anyhoo, can anyone give me the specs on an LT4 HOTcam that would come on a cam card??

John
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:20 PM
  #2  
MZK4252's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 82
From: Raleigh, NC
lift is .525 int and .525 exhaust w/ 1.6 RR. duration at .050 is 219 and 228.

I have other numbers if you need them, but those should suffice.

My guy said the springs were on the edge, but OK.
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #3  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Do you have any specs on seat pressure??

John
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
96ZRDR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 537
From: McAllen Tx. USA
They should work, but they are marginal. My brothers has had no problems what so ever. It has been 8 mths already. Plus, he revs to like 6200-6400. You definetly neev to rev the hotcam to extract maximum power.

Someone else can tell about the specs. but I know max lift with 1.6 rockers are at .525 I/E. FYI LT4 springs are rated up that only.

I have never heard of failute before.

Good Luck
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
I found this online:

One of the most obvious features of the LT4 over the LT1 is the higher 6300 rpm redline. Since the redline was increased 500 rpm, the engineers had to improve the valve springs significantly. They did this by using an egg-shaped, single-coil spring with 100 lbs. of seat pressure, as opposed to the LT1's 85-lb. pressure. The closed seat pressure is 260 lbs.

http://www.malcams.com/legacy/misc/lt1lt4.html
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Thanks Chris, I think that will help out!!

John
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 04:27 PM
  #7  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Well nevermind guys........ I told the guy earlier that if he really felt like the springs were not ok to get some other ones. Apparently he thought that the LT4 springs were just a big steaming pile of **** because he wasted no time in getting new ones. Oh well.........

John
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 05:23 PM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Keep in mind that the factory LT4 used lighter valves. Your engine builder is smart and cautious. Will they work with stock valves? I have no personal experience, but I suspect so or we would have heard about it by now.

Rich Krause
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
RobsWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 466
From: Diamondhead, MS
When I changed to the HOT cam in 98, I ditched the springs also. Had a couple checked and they didn't even make it to 525. Needless to say I didn't use them.

Don't know if they changed the springs since then as lots of people use what comes in the kit. I didn't feel comfortable with them back then.

Real LT4's had sodium filled valves which weigh a lot less than LT1 valves.
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #10  
thefast1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32
From: Seaman, OH., U.S.A.
I used the ones that came in the kit. Had zero problems and took her to 6400 quite often. I think I bought my kit in 99 or 00, not sure if they changed them or not.
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 06:59 PM
  #11  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
For $45(cost of upgraded springs) I think it's cheap insurance. Although that was $45 that I don't have.

The guy came highly recommended and does some work for race applications, so I have to trust him on this one.

Now the question, if I need to rev this motor to 6400, will the bottom end handle it?? I know it would when it was newer, but I have 125k miles. Thoughts??

Also, I would have run the stock springs and not thought twice about it, but that's just me.

John
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 09:26 PM
  #12  
NightTrain66's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,509
From: Red Oak Texas
The Hot Cam springs seem to work with no probelms of valve float or coil bind if set up like they reccomend but on paper, you would want another spring.

You would like to have more seat pressure from them but if you shim them ANY more, you will coil bind.

You did the right thing by getting different springs. People have ran them with no problems but they are just so close to "NOT WORKING" that I would reccomend a diff. spring.

NightTrain66
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #13  
Soma07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 670
From: Kissimmee/Orlando, FL
Originally posted by rskrause
Keep in mind that the factory LT4 used lighter valves. Your engine builder is smart and cautious.
I agree. Your engine builder is just trying to look out for you.

Remmeber the LT4 springs were designed with the stock LT4 cam in mind which is NOT the same as the Hotcam. Even with the 1.6 rockers the LT4 cam only had .470 lift, much less than the .525 of the Hotcam.

Also as Rich mentioned the LT4 had lighter, hollow valves.

Now you see why everyone says the LT4 springs are marginal with the Hotcam. Tons of people have used them with no problems but that does not mean they are the optimal part for the job either.

Edit: I see you bought better springs, good choice. They will probably hold their pressure better as well since they aren't being pushed to their absolute limit. You can also sell the LT4 springs to recoup some of the cost, they're worth ~$30 a set and they're great for someone who wants to run 1.6 rockers with a stock cam.

Last edited by Soma07; Jun 10, 2003 at 09:48 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #14  
96speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,248
From: Houston, TX
I ran the LT4 springs on my stock cam for a while. I think they are great choice for anyone using 1.6 rockers/stock cam, but they are puny springs. Springs are pretty cheap insurance (unless we're talking solid roller ).

Ryan
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 07:37 AM
  #15  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Well, I'm not even sure what springs the guy got for me, but I am going to find out. I'll also see if I can get some pictures of the heads up. I'm real excited to see how they look after cleaning and assembly



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.