LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Going for 12s w/bolt ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by Smokin94Z
I'm trying for bolt-on 12s too. I'm running 13.2 @101.74 with a 1.77 60 and the only mods I have are PS longtubes, 2.5 true duals/ with bullets dumped, Vig3200, 3.42s, Welds front and back, LCAs, and a Madztune. Its weighs 3680lbs with me in it and still has stock airbox.
I've read about a lot of guys running 12's with my set up, what's holding me back?
Sorry about the hijack. Figured the answer to my questions could help you as well.
get rid of that stock airbox dude thats an easy tenth right there

Originally Posted by 1SlowFormula
12's were tough for a while with minimal mods, I was stuck @ 13.1 for a while... I had stock manifolds, gutted cat, cutout, and stock (2.73) gears. I got the gears and exhaust work done and was in the 12.6 range, then weight reduction, suspension, and tires got me to where I am now...
13.1 with stock manifolds and 2.73s!

Originally Posted by T WS6 A
Just last summer, I cruised with them a few times. When it starts to get nice out will have to meet up at mt. clemens or wild woodys for there car shows.
cool i dont think i made any of their events this summer, but im definitely around mt clemens and berrymores during the summer
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 01:25 AM
  #17  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
Change the rockers and springs, it's not that much work. I already ran mine to a 107 trap (13.8 ET though... 2.5 60' ) after that mod.

Or look into gears.... maybe consider 4.11s instead of 4.10s if you can find them! (37 ring gear teeth and 9 pinion gear teeth vs 41 ring gear teeth and 10 pinion gear teeth so they're stronger).

Randy's Ring & Pinion sells lots of different gears, I have Yukon (truck) gears, they're probably pretty effing strong
um isnt a yukon rear end an 8.5" ten bolt? and im set on not changing the springs/rockers yet. those will be done with the cam as soon as i run this twelve.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 03:27 AM
  #18  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Jordon Musser's recipie for going 12's bolt-on with a '94 Z28 M6:

All engine bolt-on's
MAC shorty headers and Y-pipe including straight pipe.
Borla cat back
K&N CAI
Back seat cusions taken out
Passenger seat taken out
BFG DR's
Stock 3.42 gears
It's possible the serp. belt was removed for the run as well. Not absolutely positive on that.

I believe ran a best of 12.7 @109 at Texas Motorplex

Shawn97Z28M6
All the above except with SLP CAI and SLP shorties w/ Y-pipe and no cats going through SLP 2OTL. and ran a 12.8 @ 107

Both had stock rev. limiter and shifted at 5700rpm.

Whenever they lined up you could tell it was them from the last stall in the pits. You'd hear the engine rev to 5500rpm or a bit more and a bog when they let the clutch out. I believe they both were in at least the 1.9s 60' territory if not 1.8's.

Last edited by SS RRR; Jan 2, 2008 at 03:46 AM.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #19  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Whenever they lined up you could tell it was them from the last stall in the pits. You'd hear the engine rev to 5500rpm or a bit more and a bog when they let the clutch out. I believe they both were in at least the 1.9s 60' territory if not 1.8's.
i hope youre not telling me a 5k launch is necessary for that kind of 60 foot... i am NOT doing that. I should clarify that i dont have a stock clutch either... the 10 bolt would probably survive that behind a stocker, but my spec would end its existance.

Ive been cutting 2.1s on street tires from only 2250 RPM... thats all the traction i could squeeze out of the street tires.

Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
No it's a Yukon* R&P set for the stock 10 bolt in our cars.

*Yukon is a gear & axle company, not to be confused with the GMC Yukon.
ahhhh, you said "(truck)' thats what got me.

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; Jan 2, 2008 at 11:53 AM.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #20  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by Z28Roxy
You get traction? With 4.10s I can't even launch off idle. So maybe keep your current gears
thats why i dont want to get 4.10s. one of my buddies has 4.10s and it seems like all he does is spin. Im thinking 3.90 will be similar though.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #21  
96 mikez28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
From: keego harbor, michigan
Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
Im thinking 3.90 will be similar though.
Pretty much
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #22  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
oh well. I usually enjoy the !traction mod as long as im not at the track
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #23  
3DFORMULA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 309
From: Bartonville, Ill
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Jordon Musser's recipie for going 12's bolt-on with a '94 Z28 M6:

All engine bolt-on's
MAC shorty headers and Y-pipe including straight pipe.
Borla cat back
K&N CAI
Back seat cusions taken out
Passenger seat taken out
BFG DR's
Stock 3.42 gears
It's possible the serp. belt was removed for the run as well. Not absolutely positive on that.

I believe ran a best of 12.7 @109 at Texas Motorplex

Shawn97Z28M6
All the above except with SLP CAI and SLP shorties w/ Y-pipe and no cats going through SLP 2OTL. and ran a 12.8 @ 107

Both had stock rev. limiter and shifted at 5700rpm.

Whenever they lined up you could tell it was them from the last stall in the pits. You'd hear the engine rev to 5500rpm or a bit more and a bog when they let the clutch out. I believe they both were in at least the 1.9s 60' territory if not 1.8's.

Them are some good recipes for 12's there. I would also add to the fact that synthetic fluids thru-out would need(be helpful) to be added as I have done. However I don't have headers on yet and I'm about there.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #24  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
i hope youre not telling me a 5k launch is necessary for that kind of 60 foot... i am NOT doing that. I should clarify that i dont have a stock clutch either... the 10 bolt would probably survive that behind a stocker, but my spec would end its existance.
Yeah they both had stock clutches which made it much easier on the drivetrain, but yes, for them in order to cut those kind of 60' time w/ stock gears high rpm launches were necessary.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #25  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
gears will hurt your mpg's anyone who thinks different is a fool. When i had 3.42's doing 80mph in 6th gear would tack 2k. With 3.73's doing 80mphs tachs 2300rpms. 4'10's would be 2500rpms at 80 mph. But they do help out the car a ton. i gained 2 mph and .2 in the quarter with 3.73's
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #26  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by slomarao
gears will hurt your mpg's anyone who thinks different is a fool.
If it does hurt mileage then it is minimal at best. One of the reasons why steeper gears hurt mpg in a short term way is because once people get them they love to keep their foot into the gas because the car "feels" faster, or they'll stab a cam into their engine which will not run optimally with a given cylinder head. Running higher rpm in an engine is not what hurts fuel economy. RPM vs. load along with VE is what is detrimental to fuel mileage.
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 12:43 AM
  #27  
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,595
From: Lenexa, KS
whoamygod.
5k drop it like its hot
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #28  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Yeah they both had stock clutches which made it much easier on the drivetrain, but yes, for them in order to cut those kind of 60' time w/ stock gears high rpm launches were necessary.
My clutch is nothing like a stocker, so im going to have come up with my own formula. If i did a 5k+ drop one of two things would happen. 1) blow the tires off (even heated DRs) or 2) popped 10 bolt.

I guess there is the 2% possibility everything holds and the fronts come off the ground.
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #29  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by slomarao
gears will hurt your mpg's anyone who thinks different is a fool. When i had 3.42's doing 80mph in 6th gear would tack 2k. With 3.73's doing 80mphs tachs 2300rpms. 4'10's would be 2500rpms at 80 mph. But they do help out the car a ton. i gained 2 mph and .2 in the quarter with 3.73's
ive heard gears help, but even if they dont... doesnt really matter to me. They will probably help in the long run with the higher power band of the new cam.
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #30  
1SlowFormula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,756
From: West Linn, OR
Originally Posted by slomarao
gears will hurt your mpg's anyone who thinks different is a fool. When i had 3.42's doing 80mph in 6th gear would tack 2k. With 3.73's doing 80mphs tachs 2300rpms. 4'10's would be 2500rpms at 80 mph. But they do help out the car a ton. i gained 2 mph and .2 in the quarter with 3.73's
Yeah gears hurt your MPG if you spend most of your time cruising on the highway, but it they have shown to actually help milage around town from stoplight to stoplight, and overall a normal commuter will see minimal differences...

And, only a fool looks at half the picture...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.