LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Fuel pump question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
cliff929's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 241
From: TN
Fuel pump question

I have a 383 and my fuel pump just went out. What is the highest flowing intank pump out there right now. Is it the walbro 340? Does that mean that pump flows 340LPH? I Do plan on spraying the car with at least a 150 shot until I can afford a fuel system rebuild. Will it be safe to spray with a intank pump and a 150 shot? I have about 420rwhp through a TH400 and a 3800 stall. Not sure if I will be pushing the limit. I would replace the whole system now but funs limit that right now. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #2  
396D1SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 609
From: lakeland, fl
Re: Fuel pump question

the racetronix 255lph lt1 kit supports a tested 750rwhp

I got mine from thunderracing.com
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
hotrod18_69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,249
From: Kingman, AZ
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by 396D1SS
the racetronix 255lph lt1 kit supports a tested 750rwhp

I got mine from thunderracing.com
I'll secound that, i just put mine in 4 nights ago..
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #4  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by 396D1SS
the racetronix 255lph lt1 kit supports a tested 750rwhp

I got mine from thunderracing.com
Where did you read that?

We state that the single in-tank system w/harness is good for apx. 550RWHP. If you add a BAP to the harness it will extend RWHP support to apx 650-700RWHP. We have never seen a single in-tank system support 750RWHP!
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:03 AM
  #5  
Derrick Redd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: Gretna, LA
Smile Re: Fuel pump question

Not quite 750 RWH, but RSKrause is using a single 255lph intank + Kenne Bell "Boost-a-Pump" and it's supporting 733 RWH.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:08 AM
  #6  
DarkHorse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,433
From: Akron, Ohio
Re: Fuel pump question

Not sure about the question but the guys at Racetronix are great vendors so to them. I'd run their product in everything I own if I had the choice (and money lol)
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:28 AM
  #7  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by Derrick Redd
Not quite 750 RWH, but RSKrause is using a single 255lph intank + Kenne Bell "Boost-a-Pump" and it's supporting 733 RWH.
He is not using a Racetronix system. He has numerous other changes to the fuel system.

The numbers we quote are using factory lines with a safety margin factoring in worst case BSFC, voltage, high pressure etc.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 448
From: DAPHNE,AL USA
Re: Fuel pump question

So by using a BAP you guys are raising the fuel pressure? Maybe im lost but I thought the BAPs raise the pressure on demand for force induction cars. this would not apply on n/a cars and N20 cars. In no way should you be losing fuel pressure on a n/a cars system

Last edited by SILVERZZ28; Mar 7, 2005 at 04:25 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:06 PM
  #9  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by SILVERZZ28
So by using a BAP you guys are raising the fuel pressure? Maybe im lost but I thought the BAPs raise the pressure on demand. In no way should you be losing fuel pressure on a regular system
A BAP increases fuel pump volume which helps maintain pressure. Pressure is controlled by the regulator not the BAP.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #10  
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 448
From: DAPHNE,AL USA
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by Racetronix
A BAP increases fuel pump volume which helps maintain pressure. Pressure is controlled by the regulator not the BAP.

Actually "Pressure is controlled by the regulator not the BAP"

So your raising the voltage tells you your pump is adequate.

Correct?
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #11  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by SILVERZZ28
Actually "Pressure is controlled by the regulator not the BAP"

So your raising the voltage tells you your pump is adequate.

Correct?
If you are not maintaining fuel rial pressure due to lack of volume then speeding up the pump usually helps to a point! Pump volume / voltage is not used as a pressure control system in a F-LT1 car.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #12  
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 448
From: DAPHNE,AL USA
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by Racetronix
If you are not maintaining fuel rial pressure due to lack of volume then speeding up the pump usually helps to a point! Pump volume / voltage is not used as a pressure control system in a F-LT1 car.
so going to dual pumps intank would fix this issue instead of over working 1 pump and possible burning up?


http://home.mchsi.com/~camarozz/dual.jpg
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #13  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by SILVERZZ28
so going to dual pumps intank would fix this issue instead of over working 1 pump and possible burning up?
http://home.mchsi.com/~camarozz/dual.jpg
over working? burning up?

A Walbro pump can be run all day at 16V w/o problems. The BAP only kicks in under WOT which is for a few seconds. We have never had a failure due to using a BAP. In actual fact starving a pump for voltage can do far more damage than running a pump at slightly elevated voltage.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #14  
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 448
From: DAPHNE,AL USA
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by Racetronix
over working? burning up?

A Walbro pump can be run all day at 16V w/o problems. The BAP only kicks in under WOT which is for a few seconds. We have never had a failure due to using a BAP. In actual fact starving a pump for voltage can do far more damage than running a pump at slightly elevated voltage.
Would it not be better to do the dual in tank?
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #15  
Racetronix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 784
Re: Fuel pump question

Originally Posted by SILVERZZ28
Would it not be better to do the dual in tank?
Better? 'Is it required?' is the real quesion. A DP is more money and requires that your module be sent in to have it adapted / welded / wired etc...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.