LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Fuel limitations of a H/C Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #1  
brickonwheels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
From: Kansas City, Missouri
Fuel limitations of a H/C Z

I have an 94 Z28 with 113k miles on it. Major mods are LE1 heads and cam. I think i'm pushing somewhere around 370. My question is, if i were to run nitrous, how big of a shot could i run without running into fueling limitations? I've heard 125-150 thrown around for stock motors, but i dont know about myself. Thanks
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 01:00 AM
  #2  
zx1216's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,213
From: Milwaukee, WI
that sounds reasonable with a wet shot, are you asking about the pump or the injectors?
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
I don't know why, but in many cases the stock pump just can't keep up. In my case with only 370 rwhp it started going lean in the upper rpms because the pump was on its way out with only 29k original miles on it. The car also died on me a couple of times for no apparent reason. This is also a good example of why you should get your car dyno-tuned after you have a mail order tune for the initial start up. So lets just say because of mine and other examples that have been stated on this site, if you want to be safe, get an aftermarket pump.
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #4  
Tricked-Out-Toy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 840
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
I don't know why, but in many cases the stock pump just can't keep up. In my case with only 370 rwhp it started going lean in the upper rpms because the pump was on its way out with only 29k original miles on it. The car also died on me a couple of times for no apparent reason. This is also a good example of why you should get your car dyno-tuned after you have a mail order tune for the initial start up. So lets just say because of mine and other examples that have been stated on this site, if you want to be safe, get an aftermarket pump.
Same thing for me. around 4800 RPMs I dropped to 22PSI on 30# injectors. Im still waiting to get back on the dyno to see where Im at with the new pump but with the stock pump I could only get 362.
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #5  
roguedriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Either way, you should replace the intank just due to the amount of mileage on it. Even if its currently keeping up, you wouldn't want it to die out on you.

Ken R.
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
brickonwheels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
From: Kansas City, Missouri
So with a wet shot, all i would need to replace would be the intake fuel pump?
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
Jditlfm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 209
From: Brockport NY
Yes
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Stock fuel pumps should not be considered stock fuel pumps but 10 year old fuel pumps. Wiring going too them is too small and they are designed with stock power in mind. At the flywheel you are already putting out say 50% more than stock, the fact the stock pumps works atall for that is a testamant to it being a good piece, asking it to supply the enough for 100% more power is foolish. You want to run heads/cam/bottle you NEED at least Racetronix wiring upgrade or equivalent and a 255lph pump at least.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
May 25, 2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
Cam's maro
LT1 Based Engine Tech
23
Mar 24, 2015 08:09 PM
The Seer
Appearance
3
Nov 24, 2014 07:59 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Aug 29, 2002 01:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.