LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Finally....in the 11s!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #16  
fast 93 z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 787
From: AUSTIN (Georgetown), TX
Congrats!
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #17  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Nice. Would like to see an 11.90 w/ the belt still in place though.
Well I'm not sure when it gave up, it was still in place as I was staging...but when I turned onto the return road I noticed that I had no power steering, and my volts had dropped. So the belt was on for at least part of the 1/4 mile

I was hoping to give it another try this weekend, but it snowed pretty good last night, so no go
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
Thanks guys and I'm steadily working on dropping those 60' times. Seems like the motor makes more power the more it breaks in. I've picked up ~3 mph in the last 500 miles or so. The motor only has about 650 miles on it right now, so hopefully the trend continues for a while And yes, I'm still shifting it at 7k (according to the factory tach anyways)

Oh and D/A today was 2910' btw...
That's a young motor in my book! At least it's a iron block motor so the thing will seat in a lot shorter time frame than a LS motor does!

Keep tweaking and you'll just get faster. Good job!

Bret
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #19  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
Well I'm not sure when it gave up, it was still in place as I was staging...but when I turned onto the return road I noticed that I had no power steering, and my volts had dropped. So the belt was on for at least part of the 1/4 mile

I was hoping to give it another try this weekend, but it snowed pretty good last night, so no go
I finally tossed the OEM belt on my C5 @ 115,000 miles. I replaced it with a Goodyear Gatorback belt. Changed the tensioner too.

The belt ribs have angled grooves thru them (like the original Gatorback tires). It seems like it might follow the pulleys better. Only costs a couple bucks more.

Jon
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #20  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Thanks for the suggestion, but throwing belts is not the problem, the spring in the tensioner flat out broke so there was no tension at all on the belt.

Surprisingly, the belt didn't end up on the track though, it stayed basicly in place, just not making good enough contact with any of the pulleys to turn them.

When I removed the old tensioner, I found that not only would it move freely because the spring had broken, but also the bearing in the pulley was grinding. It was the original tensioner that GM installed on my car from the factory, so I think it was just worn out. I haven't had any belt related problems since...and trust me it's seen plenty of 7k shifts since this little mishap
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 12:36 AM
  #21  
neil350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,670
From: T E X A S
That sucker is moving out hard, get it bitting harder out the hole and you got yourself a solid mid 11 second car
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 05:57 PM
  #22  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
what are you using for rear tires?
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #23  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by remaxracer45
what are you using for rear tires?
For the track, Mickey Thompson drag radials, 255/50-16 mounted on my stock salad shooters

For the street, BFG g-force drag radials, 295/35-18 on my 18 x 10.5 ZO6 wheels
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #24  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
how do the g force stick on the street?
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #25  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by remaxracer45
how do the g force stick on the street?
They stick as good on the street as the M/T's do

However, on the track they don't work near as well as the M/T's. The fastest that I have ever ran at the track on the BFG's was in the 12.30s. Not too bad for such a low profile tire, but bolting on the M/T's knocks the times down to low 12s/high 11s

Last edited by Colin91Z; Nov 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM.
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #26  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
i am looking to put something on my 94 383Z which with traction should be well into the 11s but i don't want to have to change tires at the track as well as be able to hook up at a stop lite. I am eyeing 2754017 et streets or the drag radial hoiser has?
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #27  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by remaxracer45
i am looking to put something on my 94 383Z which with traction should be well into the 11s but i don't want to have to change tires at the track as well as be able to hook up at a stop lite. I am eyeing 2754017 et streets or the drag radial hoiser has?
I would say that the M/Ts in your size is your best bet if you don't wanna change tires at the track. I have no experience with the hoosiers though.
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #28  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
Originally Posted by remaxracer45
i am looking to put something on my 94 383Z which with traction should be well into the 11s but i don't want to have to change tires at the track as well as be able to hook up at a stop lite. I am eyeing 2754017 et streets or the drag radial hoiser has?
I would suggest against going with a 17" DR as, imho, they don't hook nearly as well as the 255 50 R16 M/T DRs on stock 16x8 wheels...There's just not enough sidewall with the 17s, unless you go with one of the newer 27-28" tall 17" DRs (I forget who makes them)...I tried the 275 17s for a long time and was not very consistent at the track...When I tried the 255s on the 16"s the difference was huge...I was going consistent 1.55 60's with the smaller tire...Front to back contact patch is just as important as tread width...

--Alan
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #29  
IrocSS85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,737
From: waterford, MI - USA
wow congradulations man. and the best part is your still not done. much better times to come with a better launch (easier said then done with the t56 though). have you tried shifting at lower rpms? unless you got a monster cam, thats higher then you should be shifting.

chris
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #30  
remaxracer45's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,875
From: Wisconsin
aba how much faster were the 16s than the 17s. don't really want to put on 16s but if thats what it takes i guess thats what i'll do. would you go with 16s' on the front as well?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.