Dynomax Bullet bad idea for stock LT1?
The big restriction is in the stock exhaust manifolds. Air will only flow as well as the point of most resistance. Changing to a louder muffler will make more sound but not much power, if any.
When I put headers on my 1994, I gained in efficiency and performance. When I put on a full catback the following week I didn't have any gain but it did sound a lot better.
When I put headers on my 1994, I gained in efficiency and performance. When I put on a full catback the following week I didn't have any gain but it did sound a lot better.
Last edited by TedH; Jan 27, 2003 at 12:08 PM.
Originally posted by tnthub
The big restriction is in the stock exhaust manifolds. Air will only flow as well as the point of most resistance. Changing to a louder muffler will make more sound mut not much power, if any.
When I put headers on my 1994, I gained in efficiency and performance. When I put on a full catback the following week I didn't have any gain but it did sound a lot better.
The big restriction is in the stock exhaust manifolds. Air will only flow as well as the point of most resistance. Changing to a louder muffler will make more sound mut not much power, if any.
When I put headers on my 1994, I gained in efficiency and performance. When I put on a full catback the following week I didn't have any gain but it did sound a lot better.
I am just commenting on actual results that I could quantify through dragstrip passes, and could adjust based on temperature, humidity, altitude and barometric pressure. When measuring 1-2 mph over a 1/4 mile or a tenth, my butt meter simply isn't good enough to quantify the difference. Heck, I can tell if it was a "good" pass or not, but translating that into exact numbers is something I cannot do without a timeslip or a dyno graph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Dec 3, 2014 09:28 PM



