Does a Compression/Horsepower Ratio Exist?
Thanks Rich.
I assume the chart numbers are percentage of increase while the axis numbers are compression ratio. If so, assuming the stock CR is 10.5:1, I dynoed 287RWHP with that CR, and trimming .025 will net me close to 11:1, I can expect an increase of about 1%, or 2.8RWHP?
If I'm reading that correctly, then I don't see what all the arguing is about when it comes to using different head gaskets?
Thanks again for posting up the chart,
Thomas.
I assume the chart numbers are percentage of increase while the axis numbers are compression ratio. If so, assuming the stock CR is 10.5:1, I dynoed 287RWHP with that CR, and trimming .025 will net me close to 11:1, I can expect an increase of about 1%, or 2.8RWHP?
If I'm reading that correctly, then I don't see what all the arguing is about when it comes to using different head gaskets?
Thanks again for posting up the chart,
Thomas.
That is how I read it, and Vizard knows his stuff. Increased CR may also improve throttle response and mileage, but I can't see an increase from 10.5 to 11:0:1 making a big difference.
Edit: One thing that applies is that the bigger the cam is, the greater the difference with a change in compression. But a half point is still very small. On my BBC alcohol bracket motor, we needed a thicker head gasket that dropped the CR fro ~13.7 to ~13.0:1. It made 4hp MORE with the lower CR. Now, the test conditions (air density) was better when it made more hp, so it is not a scientific experiment. But it should give you the idea that the difference is small. The car runs the same at the track, BTw.
Rich
Last edited by rskrause; Jan 8, 2008 at 11:34 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
GusarskiSS
Exhaust System
1
Sep 2, 2015 03:51 PM



