LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Converting Over, My Mustang Sucks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 05:38 PM
  #31  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
NEEDALT1-

First off, don't buy the first good looking Fbody you come across. If you do that you may find yourself hating it as much as your stang. It's just as easy to buy an abused Fbody that will take a dump on you as it is a mustang.

Now on to the opinion part. Get a 95. There is some info out there that suggests that 93's with speed density may be a little quicker, but the 95's come with some really handy features-

1)Vented optispark(distributor)- the optisparks on 95+ Fbodys are more durable because they aren't as susceptible to moisture getting in there and damaging them. You DO NOT want to replace an opti.

2)Reprogrammable PCM- You don't have to burn any chips like you do on the 93's. You can buy a computer program and tune the computer yourself if you like, and if you aren't that adventurous mail order tunes are available for $99+ core charge.

3)Single catalytic converter- Single cat style headers make more power than the dual catalytic converter style.

4)OBDI computer- Less emmissions requirements to worry about. Plus tuning for OBDI cars is less expensive than tuning for OBDII(OBDII starts in 96)

John
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 05:53 PM
  #32  
Dave Feerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 641
From: St. Charles, Il
but on 96 and newer cars you can pass emissions even if you HCs and COs are through the roof, they dont run them on the Constant volume analyzer, here in indiana anyway.
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #33  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 609
From: Quad Cities
Originally posted by FastZinTennessee

1)Vented optispark(distributor)- the optisparks on 95+ Fbodys are more durable because they aren't as susceptible to moisture getting in there and damaging them. You DO NOT want to replace an opti.
I think this part should read...you WILL replace the opti. Its just a matter of when. Its not like they will last forever. Its not like any parts last forever.
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #34  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Yea what he said

But generally with a vented opti it will(or at least should) last a little longer.

John
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 06:43 PM
  #35  
zuluman13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 497
From: NJ
Originally posted by CeeBee94Z
How so...they respond just as well to mods...plus they are the only ones you can adjust the fuel pressure without a reprogram....



I wish my car would adjust itself if I messed with the fuel pressure because that is a decent gain in HP
Wait how do you do thisive never heard of it before. How much power do you gain are there any negatives to doing this.
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 07:47 PM
  #36  
93formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,929
From: vancouver, BC, Canada
with a adjustable fuel pressure regulator. as for power increase im not sure how much.
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #37  
95zeee28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 99
From: canada
Originally posted by FastZinTennessee

3)Single catalytic converter- Single cat style headers make more power than the dual catalytic converter style.

John [/B]

weren't the 96's rated at 285hp compared to 275hp in the 95 due to them having dual cats, correct me if im wrong.

i own a 95 A4, i took my cat out and put in a flowmaster 80 series, do you think i would have more hp now with this set up than a 96.
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #38  
CeeBee94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 742
From: Owego, New York
Originally posted by 93formula
with a adjustable fuel pressure regulator. as for power increase im not sure how much.
On www.ws6.com I believe that they dynoed 16 rwhp by messing around with the fuel pressure, but like I said our cars with MAF's adjust the pulsewidth accordingly after running the altered fuel pressure for a while whereas the speed density setups do not adjust at all....
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:16 PM
  #39  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Originally posted by 95zeee28
weren't the 96's rated at 285hp compared to 275hp in the 95 due to them having dual cats, correct me if im wrong.

i own a 95 A4, i took my cat out and put in a flowmaster 80 series, do you think i would have more hp now with this set up than a 96.
I could be wrong, but I think dyno numbers are almost identical for single cat and dual cat cars. I wouldn't bank on a car with a dual catalytic converter setup being more powerful stock.

John
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
timmy39120
New Member Introduction
4
May 2, 2015 05:12 PM
SigSauer40
Exhaust System
2
Apr 29, 2015 09:02 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Apr 8, 2015 06:08 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Feb 1, 2015 08:26 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.