LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Compression with Mahle Powerpack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #1  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Compression with Mahle Powerpack

If I run a stock thickness headgasket and stock heads (just cleaned up) would my compression be too high for a street motor?? I will be running a cc503 cam if that makes any difference.
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #2  
roadtrip120's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 712
From: Amarillo Texas
no, prob not even over 11.0
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #3  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
It says that with 64cc heads the compression is 10.6:1. I believe the LT1 heads are 54-55cc. Wouldn't that make it higher than 11??
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #4  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by buzz12586
It says that with 64cc heads the compression is 10.6:1. I believe the LT1 heads are 54-55cc. Wouldn't that make it higher than 11??
There are a lot more variables. Those numbers aren't LT1 specific at all. Go with the felpro gaskets. Your compression definitely won't be too high as long as you use good gas.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #5  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Yea we have 93 here and thats what I use all the time. Is the FelPro gasket you are referring to the 1074 gasket?
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #6  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Originally Posted by buzz12586
If I run a stock thickness headgasket and stock heads (just cleaned up) would my compression be too high for a street motor?? I will be running a cc503 cam if that makes any difference.
Stock is a street motor designed by GM. Think your a bit confused or I am.

If you keep everything stock nothing will change from factory specs...... yes a cam does make a difference. More duration on the same lobe seperation usually lowers your dynamic compression. Static and dynamic are different as static does not change, dynamic does as takes cam timing into the statement.

Currently @ 12.8 to 1 compression and have ran as high as 13.3 to 1 with no issues. Don't be afraid of compression, it's your friend.

Normally the deck (height of piston to top of block) is about .025. It really should be checked but I'd run a much thinner gasket than stock as your quench (distance from the top of piston to bottom of head) will improve, your compression will improve and your car will run more efficient. Lingenfelter in his book recommended a .043 quench but we now find you can run a much tighter quench and get away with it. Think I'm @ .038 or very close.

Put a .029 or a .024 on it and not the .049 as you will just pick up free hp. Should be good for about 5 hp.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
So Denny, are you saying the valve reliefs are the same cc's in the stock pistons and the Mahles? Thanks, Rick.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #8  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
So Denny, are you saying the valve reliefs are the same cc's in the stock pistons and the Mahles? Thanks, Rick.
Yea that was my question as well.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
Lingenfelter in his book recommended a .043 quench but we now find you can run a much tighter quench and get away with it. Think I'm @ .038 or very close.

you can run it tighter than that too. my new 385 is at 0.030" quench.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #10  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
So Denny, are you saying the valve reliefs are the same cc's in the stock pistons and the Mahles? Thanks, Rick.
To be honest I wasn't thinking about valve reliefs when I did the post but did think of it afterward. Guessing without doing any research the valves reliefs are a little larger than stock pistons to accomodate larger valves and more lift but that would lower the compression even more.
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
you can run it tighter than that too. my new 385 is at 0.030" quench.

My wife didn't know I rebuilt the engine (sometimes you got to do those things) and didn't want it sitting for a month at a shop waiting to be decked. Screwed up and didn't have the block decked like I should is the bottom line. Instead used .024 gaskets which gave me a quench of about .047. Wasn't in love with that, but not completely out of the ballpark.

Just installed a set of .015 gaskets and still not jumping for joy on a .037-.038 quench, but it's better than .047. I'd probably be running about same as you if I had done it right in the get go as it sure makes one run more efficient.

Really amazes me how much better and more knowledgeable everyone is getting. I just love it!!

Last edited by Denny McLain; Mar 29, 2007 at 02:59 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
surreybrad
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 29, 2015 09:00 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
13qtr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
23
Jul 19, 2015 05:30 PM
Catmaigne
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 14, 2015 05:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.