Comp Cams XFI
Comp Cams XFI
Why do the XFI grinds how much higher lift numbers than their other cams? Are these for cars with ported heads? I notice that the XE (500, 502 etc.) have lift around .500 and say they are best for stock lt1. Would there be much benefit with putting an XFI cam in my car that has more lift than an XE with the same specs but less lift?
Is there much of a benefit with going over .500 lift in a stock headed lt1?
Is there much of a benefit with going over .500 lift in a stock headed lt1?
Re: Comp Cams XFI
I believe the difference you are referring to is because the XFI cams are advertised with lift numbers using 1.6 rockers, as that's what they're meant to be used with, while most other cams advertise lift with the stock 1.5.
Re: Comp Cams XFI
I’m getting ready to install a 396 LT stroker, w/ AFR 195 LT4 heads and 12.1-1 compression in my 97, Z28 which is primarily a bracket car and only driven on the street occasionally (emissions are not an issue). So, now I’m looking for the “best cam” for my application (2200-6200 RPM range w/ 3200 stall and 3.73s) and was looking over the newer Comp XFI 292/300 deg, .584/.579 lift (the largest XFI cam for the LT w/ 1.6s), as opposed to the older Comp 306. And, wanted to get some opinions here on the forum about the XFI cam. Basically, how many people are running the XFI cam in a stroker and how well it performs! Also, the comparison to the Comp 306 performance, or other LT cams.
Re: Comp Cams XFI
Originally Posted by The Engineer
I’m getting ready to install a 396 LT stroker, w/ AFR 195 LT4 heads and 12.1-1 compression in my 97, Z28 which is primarily a bracket car and only driven on the street occasionally (emissions are not an issue). So, now I’m looking for the “best cam” for my application (2200-6200 RPM range w/ 3200 stall and 3.73s) and was looking over the newer Comp XFI 292/300 deg, .584/.579 lift (the largest XFI cam for the LT w/ 1.6s), as opposed to the older Comp 306. And, wanted to get some opinions here on the forum about the XFI cam. Basically, how many people are running the XFI cam in a stroker and how well it performs! Also, the comparison to the Comp 306 performance, or other LT cams.
for an off the shelf cam ...the 468 will work fine in your application
Re: Comp Cams XFI
My suggestion on this is run Comp Cams 3100 Lobe Similiar to the XFI Lobes but more aggresive. They also have more Lift per degree of duration, ex Small duration and high lift. For springs I would check out the new Single Beehive 986 Spring that comp just came out with and it can hadle .650 Lift andhas a 1.412 O.D.
Re: Comp Cams XFI
Originally Posted by T/A KID
My suggestion on this is run Comp Cams 3100 Lobe Similiar to the XFI Lobes but more aggresive. They also have more Lift per degree of duration, ex Small duration and high lift. For springs I would check out the new Single Beehive 986 Spring that comp just came out with and it can hadle .650 Lift andhas a 1.412 O.D.
The 986-16 aren't beehives and they aren't new. They also are not enough spring for a hyd roller if you want to do anything with it.
Originally Posted by The Engineer
So, now I’m looking for the “best cam” for my application (2200-6200 RPM range w/ 3200 stall and 3.73s)
The 3200stall basically makes your minimum RPM in terms of WOT performance but by the sounds of it you also want the car to be driveable below that down 2200rpm. That means the part throttle characteristics of the cam/motor have to be what you are looking for as well.
Bret
Re: Comp Cams XFI
Something I forgot to mention with the Comp XFI cam. And that is the rod bolt, cam lobe clearance issue with a 396 stroker. This could be a problem with a 396 stroker and it would be a real PITA to buy the cam, install it then discover the rod bolt clearance issue and have to start over looking for another cam.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634
Re: Comp Cams XFI
Originally Posted by The Engineer
Something I forgot to mention with the Comp XFI cam. And that is the rod bolt, cam lobe clearance issue with a 396 stroker. This could be a problem with a 396 stroker and it would be a real PITA to buy the cam, install it then discover the rod bolt clearance issue and have to start over looking for another cam.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634
Re: Comp Cams XFI
Originally Posted by RealQuick
Can you go into more detail? I have a 383 (3.75" stroke with 5.7" rods) and I plan on using an XFI cam. Any issues you can see?
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634



Its the 236-242 at 580-585 lift 1.6 rockers on 111 lsa