LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Cam ground for 383???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 04:54 AM
  #1  
ChevyTuffD.A.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,214
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Cam ground for 383???

Hey guys my brother is going to be building a 383 stroker. I was told today by a guy I know that knows a TON about motors (kind of an old-school guy as far as engines goes) that when u build a 383 stroker that bc of the longer stroke the camshaft needs to be ground down so that the rod doesnt slap it as it comes down. Being that he is kind of old style tech I didnt know if this was true or not on the LT1, also I have never read anything about it so I was sceptical. Anyone have any input?? Thanks alot, Dustin.
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #2  
ZMaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 89
From: Warren, OH
Re: Cam ground for 383???

I'm not sure, so someone chime in here if i'm wrong, but i believe that, depending on your rod and bolts, you may need a small base circle cam on a 383.
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 12:20 PM
  #3  
redbird1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1
Re: Cam ground for 383???

I have a '96 WS6 with a 383. Altough I had the engine pro built I don't remember ever hearing about or them talking about such a thing. I find this very hard to believe. If the cam was ground down what kind of lift would you have. The lift is directly related to the centerline of the cam itself and the bearings. Also the when does the cam ever come anywere near the crank and the rods.

Wait. I just realized what i said. The lift is not relative to the center of the cam but only to the change in the lobe from highest to lowest. I still find this hard to believe.

Steve

Last edited by redbird1; Feb 26, 2005 at 12:24 PM.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Re: Cam ground for 383???

It depends on the type of rod used. 'H' beams with studs usually clear. Conventional rod with nut/bolt usually more of an issue. Needs checking, regardless of rod used. It is certainly NOT automatic, that it will interfere, or that is will not interfere.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
Eff's Avatar
Eff
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 643
From: St. Charles, IL
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by arnie
It depends on the type of rod used. 'H' beams with studs usually clear. Conventional rod with nut/bolt usually more of an issue. Needs checking, regardless of rod used. It is certainly NOT automatic, that it will interfere, or that is will not interfere.

Now I'm really confused, you sound like your talking about removing metal near the bottom of the cylinder wall's for clearence, In that case yes.

But, Chevy Tuff, forgive me if I'm being ignorent, but how would grinding the cam down have any thing to do with the length of connecting rods
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by Eff
Now I'm really confused, you sound like your talking about removing metal near the bottom of the cylinder wall's for clearance, In that case yes.
If I didn't state anything regarding removal of metal from block, then I was not referring to it. Nobody stated anything, regarding changing the length of the rods either.

The original theme was in regards to cam/rod clearance, or more precisely, a lack of it, between the rod (in the area of bolt head) and in actually, [a couple] of cam lobes. If you are familiar with the construction and pysical operation of the engine, you will understand how the cam can interfere with the rod, and where.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #7  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by arnie
It depends on the type of rod used. 'H' beams with studs usually clear. Conventional rod with nut/bolt usually more of an issue. Needs checking, regardless of rod used. It is certainly NOT automatic, that it will interfere, or that is will not interfere.

Yeah I've seen Eagle H beams and Scat I's clear without problem while some bigger I beams or stock style rods have a problem with clearance.

A smaller base circle is only needed on cams with a small lift at the lobe, the lobe lift will not change if you go to a small base circle.

Bret
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #8  
ChevyTuffD.A.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,214
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Re: Cam ground for 383???

The cam in question here is an lt4 hotcam. Yes i know this cam is small for a 383 but we just want to put a smaller cam in first bc its easier to tune and we can make sure the engine is running the way it should be before we start putting big cams in it.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Cam ground for 383???

It's probably ok then. Throw it in, spin the motor around on the engine stand and if it ever stops you, well something is hitting. Gotta make sure you degree the cam in first though.

Bret
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:34 AM
  #10  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Especially check #2-6-7 cyl and you want at least .050 between the cam and rod. I generally run a small base circle cam on ANY 383 regardless of the rod,just to keep from having to buy another cam if it hits or out of spect for the clearance.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
scott's94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22
From: scottsdale, az
Re: Cam ground for 383???

if im interpreting this right and by rod you mean connectiong rod, then what he said doesnt make any sense. how could the rod come anywhere near the camshaft. the cam is between the banks, right in the middle of the block.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #12  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by scott's94z
if im interpreting this right and by rod you mean connectiong rod, then what he said doesnt make any sense. how could the rod come anywhere near the camshaft. the cam is between the banks, right in the middle of the block.
The crank,when it is at a 12 Oclock position it will hit the cam if not enough clearance.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #13  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by scott's94z
if im interpreting this right and by rod you mean connectiong rod, then what he said doesnt make any sense. how could the rod come anywhere near the camshaft. the cam is between the banks, right in the middle of the block.
You need to find one of those old clear plastic models of a Chevy SBC (I believe they were called the "Visible V8") to understand how the relationship of the connecting rod to the camshaft changes as the bottom end of the rod follows the crank throw, rotating on a 3.75" circle, while the upper end is limited to sliding with the piston in the bore.

Some engine assembly guidelines from World Products:

Other Clearances To Check:

1. Once the crankshaft has been fitted to the block, assemble one piston and rod with rod bearing and connect it to the crank (just snug the rod bolts and no rings are required at this time), rotate the assembly and check for interference with the block. If there is interference with the block or the rod is very close to the block, mark the area that needs to be clearanced, remove the assembly and grind the block. Clean the block and reinstall the assembly again to check. Continue this procedure until a minimum of .050 clearance is obtained. Once the clearancing of this cylinder is done, move on to the other cylinders and repeat the procedure.

2. Now that the block has been checked and relieved for proper clearance of the rotating assembly, install the camshaft and degree it in. Check for
connecting rod to camshaft interference.
If clearance is needed, acquire a small base circle camshaft or grind the connecting rods to achieve a
minimum clearance of .050.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #14  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Cam ground for 383???

Originally Posted by Injuneer
You need to find one of those old clear plastic models of a Chevy SBC (I believe they were called the "Visible V8") to understand how the relationship of the connecting rod to the camshaft changes as the bottom end of the rod follows the crank throw, rotating on a 3.75" circle, while the upper end is limited to sliding with the piston in the bore.

Some engine assembly guidelines from World Products:
I have not seen one of those models in years,but good idea.
He seems to not understand the relationship of the cam and crank when rotating in the block.
Some research is called for on his part,ie. the center line of the two bore and the available space vs the used space and why they make raised cam blocks.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
ChevyTuffD.A.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,214
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Re: Cam ground for 383???

We've looked at the Eagle H beam rods and i think thats what we are going to go with. It says in the advertisment that they will clear cams up to 3.8 stroke and I beleive the 383 is 3.75 if I am correct? AS far as degreeing the cam in, i didnt think degreeing a cam in an lt1 was all that effective??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.