LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Broken Piston IN Oil Pan. SIGH. 37 miles on motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #16  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Originally Posted by ENRKyle20
I just remembered. I do have the original ballance card, with and one of my other pistons/rods im sure a shop can get my new stuff all set for me to use.
If it was an eagle kit, call eagle and give them the rod balance weight figures and they can send you a rod that is real close to that. I dont know if they would sell you a single piston but they have got a ton of them sitting around the shop if it was one of thier kits. If they will sell you one they can get it very close to the weight you give them off the balance card before you start. It will be easier that way than taking your chances on what comes out of the box.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #17  
gatorhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 172
Originally Posted by WS6T3RROR
I hate to tell you but rods that come in sets are weight matched after they are taken out of the box more so than the manufacturer does. There are in fact balance pads on many different brands and types of rods and pistons to help with weight matching. Nobody said anything about pulling it out of the box blowing the dust off and sticking it in the motor. So long as it matches the weight of the other 7 which should all be the same since it was balanced.

As long as the little end and big in weight match up to the rods he has and the piston weight matches up (even if it takes a little work) he will be fine.
Uh I think we are talking in circles now. Funny how that happens. I was merely pointing out the fact that he can't just replace a new rod and piston and throw it in there. Don't know or think that it was quite put like that just wanted to be sure he didn't understand it like that.

I certainly understand that a set of rods are sent out closely matched, but closely matched doesn't equate to a perfect match or balance. Furthermore they are matched in stocks, or lots of thousands, chances that he will get a rod or piston from the same lot are slim at best. The total weight of the rings, wrist pin, little end and big end and piston should be the same in all of the assembly. As I said before, if he has the original balance card it is fine, if he does not he needs to have the ENTIRE assembly rebalanced. That can probably be done with one of the other assemblies but in essence it is bringing the new within the same tolerances. What happens if the new pieces are actually lighter than the rest, chances are it will be heavier. It is a moot point as I think we are all on the same page, just wanted to be clear about it, as not all have the same ability to read and comprehend.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #18  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Lighter up to a suprising amount of grams you wont even notice, the case to worry about is underbalanced. Overbalance is desired to a small extent. In fact balancing is not as exact a science as most believe it is, there are factors for oil and other things at are just a best guess that has been found to work ok experimentally. There is a laundry list of things that can cause the calculated values to be off which is why we have to spin it up in the machine and test it out at all.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #19  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by gatorhead
Even if you decide to only replace one rod and piston the whole assembly should also be rebalanced. There is no way that the rod and piston will weigh the same as the others.
No need to rebalance.

Rich
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #20  
ENRKyle20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 856
From: Sheboygan, WI
thats good to know, save me a little money on not having to reballance the whole asembly again. I already ordered the new rod (waiting to really inspect the combustion chamber before I order the piston, may need to go with .040" over and bore another .010") So calling eagle and giving them the data on the ballance card is out of the question. besides I got the rod for $35 by shopping around. I also found where I can buy one piston for $22. Im going to have to buy a full set of rings, mains, and rod bearings - wich does not bother me to much.

I pulled a lazy move today and didnt get out to the shop to check anything out. I forgot it was sunday and my machine shop is closed anyway. I will get back into it tomorow


I guess lack of piston explains this:




EDIT:

Looking threw some pics of my build. I found a readable picture of the ballance sheet, just incase I cant find it. lol


Last edited by ENRKyle20; Mar 22, 2009 at 11:40 PM.
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #21  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Torquing the bolts to 40lbs in one step didn't cause this. As WS6TERROR said, you probably forgot to torque that one at all.
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #22  
ENRKyle20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 856
From: Sheboygan, WI
damn.. I guess I could have.. thats a stupid mistake eh!.. I cant believe I made it 37 miles before it starting ticking, it must have been hand tightned only. well, that will not happen again. I will be mark them this time.


Also, got my new rod today. its one gram heavier than mine. thats good. machine shop should have no problems with that.
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #23  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
If youre going to do it yourself get a yellow paint pen and mark each rod bolt AFTER you torque it to spec, also put a feeler gauge of the propper size between the rods (at the journal) as you torque them down. when tightening them before the torque do a criss cross on that rod so that it applys evenly.
Oil head of bolt (I prefer ARP molylube on threads and head).

I would as well just have the block and crank checked and replace one piston and rod. a few grams here and there will mean nothing !!!

Unless youre spinning the thing way past 7000 rpm a few grams are not going to mean squat.

If youre in doubt get a digital scales and measure it all.

I built a cheap rod balancing fixture with a 1 foot peice of 2x4 (with a notch on one side inthe middle) and a propper sides pipe for the big and little end.

Wow I balanced my rods myself for free...lol
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #24  
bombebomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by 96m6lt1
Bring to a reputable machine shop have them reassemble the shortblock
Most important part.
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #25  
ENRKyle20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 856
From: Sheboygan, WI
my machine shop is going to match the weight on the new rod and piston for $25. I just gave him the ballance sheet, and the new rod, piston, and rings. said he will get to it tommrow. nice.

Last edited by ENRKyle20; Mar 27, 2009 at 01:27 AM.
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:25 AM
  #26  
bombebomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
$25 to balance, that is extremely cheap.
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:26 AM
  #27  
ENRKyle20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 856
From: Sheboygan, WI
well hes not doing the whole thing, just rod and piston, and hes just matching it to the ballance card.. wont take but 10 mins
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #28  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Ahhhh... I was about to say!
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #29  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by bombebomb
$25 to balance, that is extremely cheap.
Too cheap. Something aint right there.
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #30  
ENRKyle20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 856
From: Sheboygan, WI
WELL. I jumped the gun a bit, after full disasembly of the engine down the the block I notice some imperfection in cylinder number 7. and its a hair to much to hone out, so it look like I am going to order a set of .040" over speedpros and I will take the block in to get bored and cleaned good. who knows where the thousands of metal peices went in that engine. so a good cleanig will ensure no problems down the road. I am also going to give him the heads to look at. I may need some new valves and a valve job. So I have a complete set (7 used with 37 miles on them) and one new speedpro .030 over pistons for sale. (the weight of the new one was matched to the 37 miles pistons)

atleast I didnt waste much money, I needed to get the rod weight correct anyway. and when I get the new pistons I will just have my machine shop be sure they weight the same of very close to my ballance card for the original pistons so as to not throw off the ballance there.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.