Borla Vs. flowmaster
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
I think it's been proven that Chokemaster make you lose HP/TQ, but the sound is
Borla on the other hand, has awesome flow to make= better HP/TQ and the sound is awesome too. You are also paying alot more than the flowmaster. IMO, it's not worth to pay more than $400 for a catback.
Borla on the other hand, has awesome flow to make= better HP/TQ and the sound is awesome too. You are also paying alot more than the flowmaster. IMO, it's not worth to pay more than $400 for a catback.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
flowmasters junk, its anything but a "flow master" ..flows like ****
Hooker catback 299.00 www.summitracing.com
Texas-speed rumbler 275.00 www.texas-speed.com
Magnaflow around 350 I think
whats best for money and performance?
Texas-speed rumbler 275.00 www.texas-speed.com
Magnaflow around 350 I think
Last edited by Antz97ZNJ; Mar 13, 2005 at 09:40 AM.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
my times with a flowmaster catback are in my sig. i know people who are slower and have a lot more bolt ons then i do......like high 13s@101 with a borla and all the bolt ons.
Last edited by 93turbo5oh; Mar 13, 2005 at 12:36 PM.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
My friend has borla on his '95 M6 car - i think it sounds like crap in person and in all the videos i've heard. Interestingly the only time i think i like the sound of the borla system is from INSIDE the car. I have the chokemaster american thunder system on my car...sounds wonderful. If i lose 3hp over the borla system well...whatever i don't care it much throatier. If you are worried about performance from your catback exhaust system then just install a cutout.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
Originally Posted by 93turbo5oh
my times with a flowmaster catback are in my sig. i know people who are slower and have a lot more bolt ons then i do......like high 13s@101 with a borla and all the bolt ons.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
the cars i was referencing are a couple of my buddies who always talk **** about my crappy exhaust after i blow their doors off.
Last edited by 93turbo5oh; Mar 13, 2005 at 01:36 PM.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
I ran .5 quicker in the 1/4 mile after I unbolted my flowmaster cat-back. So I have to say that flowmaster is not the greatest flowing cat-back. I canned mine for a used Borla and never looked back.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
Originally Posted by wicked_95z
I ran .5 quicker in the 1/4 mile after I unbolted my flowmaster cat-back. So I have to say that flowmaster is not the greatest flowing cat-back. I canned mine for a used Borla and never looked back.
Last edited by 93turbo5oh; Mar 13, 2005 at 01:44 PM.
Re: Borla Vs. flowmaster
Originally Posted by wicked_95z
I ran .5 quicker in the 1/4 mile after I unbolted my flowmaster cat-back. So I have to say that flowmaster is not the greatest flowing cat-back. I canned mine for a used Borla and never looked back.
Again, this is why i say install a catback that sounds good for regular driving and a cutout for the strip. To install a catback system based on performance is somewhat ridiculous - we are talking about very small gains between systems.


