LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

boost vs. N/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 09:16 PM
  #1  
mikemassi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
boost vs. N/A

Im about to take my 94 z28 off the road to do a motor build and start making some good numbers. Im stuck inbetween building a low compression motor for a S/c or a turbo. other option is a high compression 383 head and cam motor. Anybody have good advice/opinions on this subject that can help me decide???

thnks
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 12:02 AM
  #2  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Depends on what you're looking for. A supercharger build will run you 2x the cost of a high compression 383, but with LOTS more power potential. What are you looking to do with the car? Any specific numbers?
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 12:26 AM
  #3  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
What do you want to do with the car? Is it a street car, a strip car, auto cross/road racing, show car/dyno queen? Build it with a purpose, not to make a number.
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 07:21 AM
  #4  
mikemassi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
its mainly going to be a street car. and id like to go high 11's.
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
GRIDERMAN87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 365
From: Oklahoma---405
for that i think the 383 would be good, i would try to keep it under 12:1 so you can run pump gas
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
bw_hunter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
You can get into the 11's with a 350 or 355...no need to go to the expense of a 383 or a FI rebuild.

A good set of heads, a good cam and a good tune will get you there....
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #7  
bds001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 125
From: NW Arkansas
What Hunter said. That's and some suspension, transmission and tires and you're golden
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
old93camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Originally Posted by GRIDERMAN87
for that i think the 383 would be good, i would try to keep it under 12:1 so you can run pump gas
I run 12:1 on 91 pump gas with no problem????
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:30 AM
  #9  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Static compression doesn't dictate what fuel octane is needed. Dynamic compression does.
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
GRIDERMAN87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 365
From: Oklahoma---405
Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
Static compression doesn't dictate what fuel octane is needed. Dynamic compression does.
I was using the static ratio as a rule of thumb, dynamic compression can also be altered with the cam, but a higher static ratio, (usually) means higher dynamic. So I would attempt to stay under 12:1 if I were planning on running pump gas.
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #11  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Originally Posted by GRIDERMAN87
I was using the static ratio as a rule of thumb, dynamic compression can also be altered with the cam, but a higher static ratio, (usually) means higher dynamic. So I would attempt to stay under 12:1 if I were planning on running pump gas.
Cam size is EVERYTHING. High static compression and a small cam = high dynamic compression. High static compression and large cam = lower dynamic compression.

FWIW, I'm running close to 13:1 with a moderately-sized stroker cam and have a DCR of around 9.5:1. Runs perfectly on 93-octane.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
Mikes 1994 z28
Drivetrain
1
Oct 10, 2015 07:55 AM
96SilverRam
Parts For Sale
1
Sep 7, 2015 10:51 PM
Henson071
Parts For Sale
0
Aug 4, 2015 09:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.