LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Best year of LT1 F-Bodies?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
omarECD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26
From: Philadelphia, PA
Best year of LT1 F-Bodies?

Hi, I have been wanting an LT1 for a loooooong time now, either a Z28 or a Trans Am, depending on the deal I find. I think now I am finally ready to start making decisions...

What year(s) should I be looking at? I know the 95+ have OBD2, should I go for those or are the OBD1s easier to work on? What years are easier to troubleshoot/work on/are more reliable. I don't plan on doing extensive mods now, just basic stuff like exhaust, intake, etc and other simple stuff.

Can someone highlight the differences between the years 93-97?

Thanks for your help
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
white97z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
Well, that has been a broad topic discussed. I would recommend doing a SEARCH. But IMPO, 97 is the best year. The wheels, tailights, instrument panel of a 98. But it is OBD11, therefore a little more sophisticated. Id say go with 97 if you can find one cheap. I got mine for about 7800 with 75K on it. But i found out it has problems.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #3  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
If you want performance, and maybe a little better reliability... then 95 because of OBD1 and exhaust setup.

If you want the best style, then 97 like he said.

edit: forgot about vented opti

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; Jan 24, 2004 at 09:09 PM.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
magnumv8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 564
From: Quad Cities, IL
a couple of nice things about 95 are... most are OBD1 and they have the vented opti.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #5  
white97z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
What makes a 95 have more performance than my 97?
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #6  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally posted by white97z/28
What makes a 95 have more performance than my 97?
from what ive heard, the 95 computers work better, and can be tuned better/easier.

Also if (and only if) you get headers the 95 setup is better.

So in conclusion... your car is faster stock, but I can mod mine better. (although you could change to a OBD1 and 95 style headers , but the latter would not be emissions legal)
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
1FASASZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 447
From: reno, nv
Originally posted by JoeliusZ28
from what ive heard, the 95 computers work better, and can be tuned better/easier.

Also if (and only if) you get headers the 95 setup is better.

So in conclusion... your car is faster stock, but I can mod mine better. (although you could change to a OBD1 and 95 style headers , but the latter would not be emissions legal)
how are the 97s faster than 95s stock for stock? i thought they were the same. i dont like the instrament panal of the 97s and later. i think the dash and the guages on the 93-96 are way better looking and more sporty
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #8  
white97z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
i thought that is what you meant, but i was just checking. Switchen mine to OBD1 sucks though, its like $275 i think. Dont have that kind of money. Some 95's were OBD11 though right? I could have bought a 94 for the 3500 a few months ago, but was low on cash and couldnt do it. Oh well, wish i had ev went to the bank, 3500 is hella cheaper than 7800. Oh well, you live and you learn you know.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:24 PM
  #9  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,925
From: Detroit
Originally posted by 1FASASZ
how are the 97s faster than 95s stock for stock? i thought they were the same. i dont like the instrament panal of the 97s and later. i think the dash and the guages on the 93-96 are way better looking and more sporty
stock for stock, the dual cat setup is better, but if you do headers, its not.

Originally posted by white97z/28
i thought that is what you meant, but i was just checking. Switchen mine to OBD1 sucks though, its like $275 i think. Dont have that kind of money. Some 95's were OBD11 though right? I could have bought a 94 for the 3500 a few months ago, but was low on cash and couldnt do it. Oh well, wish i had ev went to the bank, 3500 is hella cheaper than 7800. Oh well, you live and you learn you know.
Some 95's have OBD1 with an OBD2 connector, im not sure about OBD2 95s though.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:31 PM
  #10  
Fatdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 538
From: valencia,california,u.s.a.
Cool

I love my 93(bird), but you might take a look at the 95 -97 group(Camaro or bird).I like them ,,look for dual exhaust..My02
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #11  
95z28 -quicksilver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,070
From: Austin, TX or Texas State University at San Marcos
95 for the already stated OBD1 computer and vented opti..... but the 97 's have a cupholder you can actuall USE!!!!!!!!!! So, either way having a LT1 is your first good choice.

Chris
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #12  
omarECD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26
From: Philadelphia, PA
Thanks for the advice everybody. So, what should I look for/check before buying to make sure I'm not getting a car with issues?

What else is a common problem besides the opti's?
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #13  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
A '97 for sure, but I'm biased.

They are all about the same for power so don't worry about that.

The cool thing about the 97's is that the new interior is the same as the '98+ and so are the tail lights. That is a preference thing though, and some may like the earlier model LT1's better. You can look at the picture in my sig to see the tail lights.

Bottom line is that it's hard to get a bad year. All LT1's are great in my opinion, but so are LS1's.

One more thing about the '97's is that they will tend to have less miles than the earlier model LT1's.

Dan
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #14  
EbeZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 195
From: Walla Walla, WA
Originally posted by omarECD
Thanks for the advice everybody. So, what should I look for/check before buying to make sure I'm not getting a car with issues?

What else is a common problem besides the opti's?
Intake manifold oil leak. Particularly the rear of the intake. If you get the car out an run it hard for a bit you'll get oil dripping off of the tranny/rear of the motor and maybe a little smoke

Fron cover sometimes leaks as well. Get under the car and look for oily lines. Fix it your self is "easy" and pretty cheap. Paying someone else to change some of the leaky gaskets can get kind of expensive.

Oh yeah, broken tranny mounts. Tranny goes "thunk" when you stomp on it from a slow roll/stopped. $20 and 10 minutes to swap out.

Last edited by EbeZ28; Jan 26, 2004 at 10:22 AM.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #15  
omarECD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26
From: Philadelphia, PA
I'm looking to spend around 7 grand or so for an LT1 with around 70k miles, so a 1997 is probably out of reach. I know these aren't the most reliable cars, but what have been your personal experiences with these cars?

My AIM screen name is OmarECD if you wanna fill me in...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.