Anybody using the 26120 Beehive w/ hydraulic rollers?
Anybody using the 26120 Beehive w/ hydraulic rollers?
As title says..........
using these vs. the 26918 beehives, more load, any long term effects on the HR lifters?
Thanks!
BTW, I`m going to use the new GM Racing CTS-V Caddy lifter.
using these vs. the 26918 beehives, more load, any long term effects on the HR lifters?
Thanks!
BTW, I`m going to use the new GM Racing CTS-V Caddy lifter.
Last edited by cdb95z28; Mar 21, 2007 at 07:41 AM.
Lots and lots of people use those springs. I have them on my daily driver for probably 15k with oem replacement lifters. Its very common to run them on stock lifters as there haven't been any good cheap alternatives for lifters until now.
Do you mean yet, or is there something I missed recently? I was getting ready to bite the bullet on some Morels just because I trashed a low mile stock lifter and am doing another rebuild now.
Yes, if you do a search there is a new gm performance lifter thats supposed to be awesome and pretty cheap at $220 a set.
Check this thread for the new Cadillac hydraulic roller lifters. http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=501293
The 26120's can work but 99% of the time you don't need them and you have to do some other things to make them work on a head.
Bret
You're right. I read the thread wrong and thought he was asking if a lot of people run 918's on stock lifters. I've become what I fear most, one of the guys that responds but doesn't read the complete thread.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



They sure looked like it when I was over helping degree his new cam that you sent him. I thought the 26120's were a larger diameter?
