Yea everybody should have one of those.

 

Longer, higher runners also.

 

And just what did you determine this Mike? I don't see it in any wording or the pix provided. Based on the pix, the port runner length looks very stock. Or, is this just a guess on your part?

 

there's already a better intake out there

http://home.wideopenwest.com/~squinn0039/ltx.html

imo
mike

 

That's a good one but won't hold a candle to that Wilson I have.

 

That's to bad, and here I was going to tell you the length of mine, if you told me yours. Sorry just a bad attempt at trying to be funny.

 

It's all about the CSA.

 

Once again, we can compare notes. But I most warn you, the wife says mine is more than adequate. And I might add, I thought it was more about length for the ram effect, than CSA. All though both are important!

 

It has to do with the beautiful mount and dismount also.
"O" has anybody told ya 8 seconds ain't a good ride....
Wives lie to their hubby's too.

 

(8 seconds ain't a good ride) It IS in bull riding, but that not the results we're looking for is it? And yes the wives do tend to fib once in a while.
But back to one off intakes. In my case, high 11's with a stock low mileage short block and a puny cam will make me happy. After that maybe a little spray for low 11's. Once it pukes, who knows? Maybe I'll be looking for your guidance with a new short block, cam, and know how of what it takes to compliment a custom intake manifold.
Thanks for the laugh, Rick.

 

Anytime.
8 seconds is a good pass though. I'd be proud of that time ticket.

 

Deductive reasoning.

 

I think you two guys are talking about two different intakes?


The stock one with the 'box" welded on the top I would think has stock runners, almost has to have.


Ours, not stock length runners or plenum volume.


David

 

I'm talking about the one linked in post above my post.

 

I think Mike is talking about our Wilson.