LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Am I expecting too much out of my heads/cam LT1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 04:30 PM
  #16  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Thanks for all the replies! Hopefully it is just in the tune. When I had it dyno tuned before I still had exhaust leaks and a no MSD box yet. I should have waited until I got things sorted out. Because my headers/y-pipe/ORP are all ceramic coated, they welded the wide band O2 bung into the front of the cat back exhaust. It's hard to say how many joints in the exhaust were leaking before that point. It's hard to get that ball & socket setup on the MAC's to seal real well. The race version of the long tubes w/slip on connections and band clamps should fix those problems.

Originally posted by jtk
I noticed you mentioned vacuum modulator for your trans, isent the 94 electronicly controled?
Yes it is. The vacuum modulator only takes away the control of the hydraulic pressure. My shift points will still be controlled by the PCM. The electronic control has trouble holding hydraulic pressure above 6000 rpm. The vacuum modulator should fix that. My trans isn't in the best shape but it really shouldn't be the main cause of my slow times. It probably will get built by the end of the year. I plan on spraying the car once I get my N/A problems figured out. I don't think the trans will like that too much.

Originally posted by R/T-Z/28
Hello,

New to this site, nice one it is for sure. I noticed you had mentioned 12.8's with just bolt on's, sweet. Would love to get that recipe as I too have a '94 Z/28 convert. Purple pearl with black top. Thanks in advance, Darrell
Welcome to the board. I sent you an email.
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #17  
Birdie2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,519
From: Westland, MI
Scott,
I can't remember if you told me or not, but what kinda numbers did the car make? APE tuned it, correct? 3750 really isn't all that bad for a vert, my t-top car weighed in at that w/ me in the car last year.

Also, if you do end up getting rid of that Digital 6 I may be interested in it.
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #18  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
The 3750 was a guess. It's probably more like 3850 but I didn't want to overstate it. I've added an 8 point chromoly roll bar, custom chromoly subframe connectors and a heavy *** BMR adjustable torque arm. Weight reduction consists of spare tire & jack, back seats, A/C compressor, lightweight carpet & front sway bar.

It was tuned at Speedworks. It wasn't ready for the dyno. The dyno graph shows the engine breaking up between 5800-6100 rpm. Greg thought it was due to blowing out the spark because of no MSD.

I can't afford to spend another $500 on a dyno tune so I'll be spending $50 on a PCMforless tune that I can upload myself with LT1 edit. From there the fine tuning will be done by a fellow local enthusiast who knows his way around an LT1 PCM. My dyno tune money is going toward the long tubes instead.

We'll have to talk about the digital 6. Dennis already called dibs on it but if he changes his mind, it's yours. Assuming I do wind up switching to the Delteq.

Last edited by 94_Z28_ragtop; Jul 2, 2004 at 05:06 PM.
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #19  
97Z-M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,058
From: near waco tx.
Thanks for all the replies! Hopefully it is just in the tune. When I had it dyno tuned before I still had exhaust leaks and a no MSD box yet. I should have waited until I got things sorted out. Because my headers/y-pipe/ORP are all ceramic coated, they welded the wide band O2 bung into the front of the cat back exhaust. It's hard to say how many joints in the exhaust were leaking before that point. It's hard to get that ball & socket setup on the MAC's to seal real well. The race version of the long tubes w/slip on connections and band clamps should fix those problems.

you can go dyno tune a car with exhaust leaks meaning more than one. if youve fixed them your car is running rich. you need to get all the exhaust leaks fixed and get it retuned
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #20  
big dave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 564
From: Silver Spring ,Md.
I think the times are pretty good considering the weight. What were the weather conditions when you ran those numbers? With my car, my times will drop down into the 12.6s to 12.8s in poor weather conditions. We all know lt1s hate heat. Tuning will definitely help also.
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 05:21 PM
  #21  
jtk's Avatar
jtk
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 166
Yes it is. The vacuum modulator only takes away the control of the hydraulic pressure. My shift points will still be controlled by the PCM. The electronic control has trouble holding hydraulic pressure above 6000 rpm. The vacuum modulator should fix that. My trans isn't in the best shape but it really shouldn't be the main cause of my slow times. It probably will get built by the end of the year. I plan on spraying the car once I get my N/A problems figured out. I don't think the trans will like that too much.

-- hmm.. interesting.. were do they sell somthing like that?
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #22  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Originally posted by jtk
-- hmm.. interesting.. were do they sell somthing like that?
Transgo sells a kit. It's around $125. I bought mine from Ramchargers. You could contact Transgo and they could tell you who a local distributor is for you.

You could also buy a high end built up 4L60E trans. Pretty much anybody making race prep 4L60E's switches them over to a vacuum modulator. FLP level IV and up transmissions are vacuum modulated.

You can do a search here or at ls1tech.com for more information.

Last edited by 94_Z28_ragtop; Jul 2, 2004 at 05:28 PM.
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #23  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
Originally posted by 94_Z28_ragtop

You could also buy a high end built up 4L60E trans. Pretty much anybody making race prep 4L60E's switches them over to a vacuum modulator. FLP level IV and up transmissions are vacuum modulated.

I've built 4L60Es running 11.0's that still retain the computer controlled pressure. Vacuum modulators are akin to putting a carburetor on an LT1. People do it just because they don't understand what they're working with.

Frank
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 10:52 PM
  #24  
SAR2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 435
From: Louisiana
Your converter is way too small... especially for that tank of a car. Jump up to a 3600 converter (at least) and put the car on a diet if you want some better 1/4 times.
Steve...
Old Jul 2, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #25  
ROADRAGE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 886
From: Lake Orion Mi
Originally posted by 12SCNDZ
I've built 4L60Es running 11.0's that still retain the computer controlled pressure. Vacuum modulators are akin to putting a carburetor on an LT1. People do it just because they don't understand what they're working with.

Frank
From what I understood, they are changed mainly to avoid the problem big converter cars(3x multiplication) have with shifting into second.
Old Jul 3, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #26  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Originally posted by ROADRAGE
From what I understood, they are changed mainly to avoid the problem big converter cars(3x multiplication) have with shifting into second.
You're right on the money, Eric. That's exactly why I'm converting. The "program" fixes Ed Wright, PCMforless and others provide only work some of the time. From what I understand, the vacuum modulator works all the time. It also helps smooth out the bone jarring part throttle shifting.

Originally posted by 94_Z28_ragtop
I'm adding a vacuum modulator kit to the trans so it will hold line pressure at high rpm so I can put a bigger stall in it without the OBD1 no shifting burnt clutch pack condition.
Old Jul 3, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #27  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Originally posted by big dave
I think the times are pretty good considering the weight. What were the weather conditions when you ran those numbers? With my car, my times will drop down into the 12.6s to 12.8s in poor weather conditions. We all know lt1s hate heat. Tuning will definitely help also.
The temperature was probably in the 60's and the DA was probably under 1000.
Old Jul 3, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #28  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Originally posted by SAR2K
Your converter is way too small... especially for that tank of a car. Jump up to a 3600 converter (at least) and put the car on a diet if you want some better 1/4 times.
Steve...
The plan is to change my Vigilante over to a 3200 or 3400 (more likely) stall. I just need to get the vacuum modulator kit installed. I probably won't switch it until I pull the trans for a build up in the fall (or sooner if needed). It only 60 ft's in the low to mid 1.7's now and it should be solidly in the low 1.6's.
Old Jul 3, 2004 | 08:44 AM
  #29  
xxsaint69x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,889
From: Peachtree City, GA
Originally posted by n20ta2
im running mid 11's with home ported heads a gm 847 and a mail order tune.

that trap speed is pretty impressive......what kinda weight reduction do you have? Also i am guessing you are still on a 10 bolt? Any dyno numbers?
Old Jul 3, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #30  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,935
From: Mobile, Ala..USA
That car seems to me the car is bad in need of a converter and a 4.10 gear, with those two things and some bite look for some low 12's
I would go a 3800 converter and a 4.10 if it was mine.


David



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.