Aluminum heads or stick with iron
Re: Aluminum heads or stick with iron
Originally Posted by 97WS6SCharged
Heat disipation simply allows for more compression with the same amount of timing. The biggest advantage to aluminum heads, IMO, is the light weight of the castings, and the fact that they are much easier to port than iron castings. 

So when you TRY to put 2.02-1.6's in the LT1 stock aluminum head you overlap the valves and float them quicker. Manufacturers like Trick Flow and Edelbrock tried to overcome it but when you deal with our reverse cooling design it is rather difficult to achieve.
Re: Aluminum heads or stick with iron
Originally Posted by 97WS6SCharged
Heat disipation simply allows for more compression with the same amount of timing. The biggest advantage to aluminum heads, IMO, is the light weight of the castings, and the fact that they are much easier to port than iron castings. 

I know it sounds like I am just trying to be argumentative but the misconception that aluminum is magically better and iron has no place on a performance engine is a pet peeve of mine. Both sets of heads are good and swapping either stock for stock would be a complete waste of effort and money. Also I am comming from the side of this that got the irons stock, it doesn't happen much anymore but we used to get a lot of guys that would post how they got Z28 or Vette heads and were going to swap them in stock because they came from a Vette of F-body and that had to be where all the extra power came from. End result was a 30lbs. weight savings on a 4200lbs. car
and depending on the casting of heads anything from a slight power lose to just equal power. Now tell me is a 30lbs. savings on a car that heavy worth the cost and effort of a head swap, better off to run a lighter battery and yank the AIR sytem(we can legally defeat it
so most of us go the extra step and pull it) to shave that little weight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Dec 7, 2014 12:15 PM



