LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #1  
93camaroLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 665
AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

I'm looking at buying LTs, do you guys end up having any problems with when you remove the AIR and EGR hookups with your cars? the car will be a heads/cam/nitrous car and will be tuned, i have no clue what the AIR does, but I know the EGR is a good system for a street car that helps disapate heat from the motor when hot, what if I were to just run the car richer to essentially do the same thing (cool the motor... without puting burned exhaust back into motor to take up displacement)? any help here would be helpful..
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
pHEnomIC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,388
From: SE Michigan
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

I would just take em both out if i were doing headers. The air pump is usually defective anyays and takes up a whole bunch of room. I don't know too much about the egr, it really doesnt take up too much room and doesnt cause much problem so you could leave it if you want. I hear it causes the intake leak because of its location but for many people, it is not a problem. Since you have odb1, id ditch both and you wouldnt even need a tune.
Old May 17, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
cb94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 108
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

I planned on removing mine when I did my lt's but didn't get the block off plates in time, and having to put the air and egr stuff back in made the install a whole lot worse. and I'm still planning on pulling them so just that much more work
Old May 17, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
93camaroLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 665
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

does anyone have problems with disappating heat on their street cars with the egr removed?? The egr seems to be a good system thats been around forever, it is pretty useless on drag only cars, but I dunno, it seems like a lot of people just ditch the system.. how do your cars run with the egr and air removed?
Old May 17, 2005 | 11:07 PM
  #5  
Evil Eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

i removed the egr and air and then had them tuned out after my cam install. I'd reccomend it even if all youre doing is cleaning up the engine bay. i hate egr because it puts soot all inside the intake manifold. My car runs perfectly without it.
Old May 18, 2005 | 12:35 AM
  #6  
revtime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,734
From: Kansas City suburb of
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Same here.
Took out the AIR and EGR when I put LTs in 2 years ago.
It runs 13.4 @ 104 in the 1/4 with 1.8 sixty foot times. I drive it everyday during the summer and have no problems.
Old May 18, 2005 | 05:04 AM
  #7  
cmking26's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 516
From: Illinois
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Never a problem here without em. Take em out their ugly and in the way. IMO
Old May 18, 2005 | 05:20 AM
  #8  
Loadre's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,887
From: Kingsport, TN
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Take it out, makes the engine bay look a lot nicer plus it gives you an excuse to fab up some blockoff plates which is always fun.
Old May 18, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,086
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Originally Posted by 93camaroLT1
does anyone have problems with disappating heat on their street cars with the egr removed?? The egr seems to be a good system thats been around forever, it is pretty useless on drag only cars, but I dunno, it seems like a lot of people just ditch the system.. how do your cars run with the egr and air removed?
The EGR's role is a little more involved than "disappating heat". The exhaust gasses are introduced to the combustion chamber to displace oxygen, and quench combustion temperatures, but only under conditions that would lead to the formation of oxides of nitrogen (NOx). As combustion chamber temps climb, the formation of NOx is more likely. A typical condition that triggers EGR flow is lugging the engine at to low an RPM in too high a gear. In addition to reducing combustion chamber temps under those conditions, the EGR also helps reduce the tendancy to detonate (knock).

EGR does not operate at idle, does not operate over 3,500rpm and does not operate at WOT. It has absolutley no negative affect on performance (unless the valve is leaky and allow exhaust to enter the intake manifold when it isn't supposed to). There is no real "clutter" with the EGR system.... its all hidden behind the intake manifold. I really can't see any good reason to delete it on a "street" car.

AIR is only used for a couple minutes at startup. It helps burn unburned hydrocarbons that result from the enriched cold start mixture, and the heat from that exothermic combustion speeds up the heating of the catalyst. It has to reach 600deg before it will work. Once the cat is heated up, the AIR system shuts down. Never affects perfromance in any way. I would agree there is a bit of clutter from the system.

Point is though, deleting the systems does nothing for performance, except a few pounds of weight savings. If you live where there are visual emissions inspections, they'll probably notice they are missing. If you live where they check tailpipe emissions on an I/M240 style dyno test, you run the risk of increased NOx emissions.

I put together an 800HP nitroused stroker, and kept all the emissions systems intact (at least as long as the car was street driven). Didn't hurt my performance in any way, and the car passed rolling emissions. The only problem the car had on the "visual" was the fact that I had increased the number of cats from 1 to 2, and relocated them. But most inspection shops didn't know the difference on that point.
Old May 18, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #10  
1quickTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 607
From: Kzoo, MI
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Injuneer (last post) did a good job of explain what EGR and AIR are: EGR recirculates hot exhaust gas back into the engine for lower emissions and AIR is used to help keep your CATS good while they are still cold (at start up). I removed both EGR and AIR when I put my headers in. If you are taking out your CATS then you have no need for AIR. I don't know how important it is to have if you are keeping them. I see no down side to removing the EGR so that you aren't pumping hot air back in either. Just make sure to block the openings on your intake. And as everyone else says, it cleans up the engine bay and gets rid of useless weight.
Old May 18, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #11  
93camaroLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 665
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

sounds good, I will be taking them both out.. Is there somewhere where you can buy block off plates for the intake manifold or is that something you just rig up????
Old May 18, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #12  
BLinindoll's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 459
From: East Greenbush, NY
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

First, you can either rig up a plate or go to your dealer and buy one for an LT4 engine. The LT4's use the blockoff plate from the factory.

Second, I have never seen headers that have hook ups for just the EGR and not the AIR. They either have them both, or have neither.

Third, Injuneer, I wish there were mechanics around here that actually know what they are talking about like you do. It seems as though I know more then these idiots around here, which is sad, because im only 20.
Old May 18, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #13  
NtenseZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 165
From: Ware, Massachusetts
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Mine went to live with god...no problems

Supposedly the cam overlap made the LT4's able to pass emissions without EGR...so anyone running a hot cam or like cam should be all set come inspection time...

I put on a Magnaflow stainless converter and got rid of the EGR system...passed emissions with no problems. I have a cam that is close to the Hot Cam...headers etc...no air...no EGR
Old May 18, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #14  
93camaroLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 665
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Originally Posted by NtenseZ28
Mine went to live with god...no problems

Supposedly the cam overlap made the LT4's able to pass emissions without EGR...so anyone running a hot cam or like cam should be all set come inspection time...

I put on a Magnaflow stainless converter and got rid of the EGR system...passed emissions with no problems. I have a cam that is close to the Hot Cam...headers etc...no air...no EGR
i got emmisions out here in the suburbs of chicago but with the cam I am going to be running, there's no way in hell i'd be able to pass emmisions anyway so I think i'm just going to try to register the car as a "race car" to waiver emmisions... I only really drive my camaro 1,500 miles a year being that I have a daily driver
Old May 30, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #15  
bdc95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,220
From: houston, texas
Re: AIR and EGR removal, good or bad idea?

Did you guys remove the egr tube and valve or just the tube?? just curious
-b



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.