52mm or 58mm throttle body
52mm or 58mm throttle body
i have a 93 z28 and i am looking to buy a larger throttle body, i was wondering if a 52mm is big enough or if i should go with a 58mm, i am running about 350hp now with bolt ons, and i have heard that it can sometimes be detremental to go too big on the tb and i plan on getting nitrous in the near future as well.
i have a 93 z28 and i am looking to buy a larger throttle body, i was wondering if a 52mm is big enough or if i should go with a 58mm, i am running about 350hp now with bolt ons, and i have heard that it can sometimes be detremental to go too big on the tb and i plan on getting nitrous in the near future as well.
Unless you really increase the breathing (boost, N2O, or Heads/Cam), you would not likely reap the benefits of a larger TB. I installed a 58mm TB when I did my heads/cam and it seems to help a lot. We recorded the MAP on a dyno while pulling runs for the tune, there was little to no restriction in the intake. If the TB was a restriction, then I would have seen more vacuum present.
In my opinion, unless you are planning on more mods in the future, you may feel disappointed.
I did notice that my clutch engagement seems to have changed. I used to launch with about 1/2 throttle at about 3/4 engagement. Now I launch with about 3/4 throttle at near full engagement... the TB acts differently. It kind of lags, then rockets hard so if you have a clutch, you may need to learn to drive it differently than you used to or you may stall a few times. No big deal, just something to get used to.
In my opinion, unless you are planning on more mods in the future, you may feel disappointed.
I did notice that my clutch engagement seems to have changed. I used to launch with about 1/2 throttle at about 3/4 engagement. Now I launch with about 3/4 throttle at near full engagement... the TB acts differently. It kind of lags, then rockets hard so if you have a clutch, you may need to learn to drive it differently than you used to or you may stall a few times. No big deal, just something to get used to.
So, what are your guy's opinion on the TBs? Is it hp based or RPM or both? I am rebuilding my engine and trying to keep most of the stock parts there. I'm getting the heads machined and a new cam put in. I'm hoping to hit between 350-400 rwhp while staying below 6000 rpm. I didn't start this thread but maybe if you can answer my question it'll help kohl as well.
Posted by Injuneer -
Because at 753 CFM (and assuming the measurement of 783 CFM @ 28" H2O is valid) the 48mm TB will be causing a pressure loss of (approx) 25.9"H2O. Pressure lost in the intake track reduces the density of air in the cylinders, reducing HP proportionally.
Assuming simplified calculations (and basing it on the quoted numbers for the 48mm TB), for 753 CFM, pressure loss would be:
48mm = 25.9"H2O
52mm = 22.1"H2O
58mm = 17.7"H2O
The simplified basis for this calculation is that pressure loss is roughly proportional to the square of the veloicty.
If you consider the fact that standard atmospheric pressure is about 407"H2O, you can see that the pressure loss in each TB size is reducing your HP by:
48mm = 6.4%
52mm = 5.4%
58mm = 4.4%
Because at 753 CFM (and assuming the measurement of 783 CFM @ 28" H2O is valid) the 48mm TB will be causing a pressure loss of (approx) 25.9"H2O. Pressure lost in the intake track reduces the density of air in the cylinders, reducing HP proportionally.
Assuming simplified calculations (and basing it on the quoted numbers for the 48mm TB), for 753 CFM, pressure loss would be:
48mm = 25.9"H2O
52mm = 22.1"H2O
58mm = 17.7"H2O
The simplified basis for this calculation is that pressure loss is roughly proportional to the square of the veloicty.
If you consider the fact that standard atmospheric pressure is about 407"H2O, you can see that the pressure loss in each TB size is reducing your HP by:
48mm = 6.4%
52mm = 5.4%
58mm = 4.4%
So, what are your guy's opinion on the TBs? Is it hp based or RPM or both? I am rebuilding my engine and trying to keep most of the stock parts there. I'm getting the heads machined and a new cam put in. I'm hoping to hit between 350-400 rwhp while staying below 6000 rpm. I didn't start this thread but maybe if you can answer my question it'll help kohl as well.
What is being done to the heads? Machine work as in rebuilt head or port work? 400hp will be hard with just a cam alone and stock heads.Same goes with staying below 6k rpm. Not impossible but you had best pick your stuff and make sure you have a combo that works well together. Unless you spray....
I've went thru two of those in the past year...They both had a habitual problem with sticking. I'd stay away from them. I'm at almost 6,000 ft in elevation don't know if that matters or not, but after I threw my 58mm Edelbrock on and tuned the throttle body I noticed my throttle response/ acceleration was considerably better than stock. *shrugs*
Last edited by Kaj; Mar 28, 2008 at 03:45 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM



