LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

400+ CI LS1s are everywhere why are there no big inch LT1s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #1  
Camaro37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 226
From: Texorado
400+ CI LS1s are everywhere why are there no big inch LT1s

I hear people say that the LT1 is stronger than the LS1 cause of the iron block, but it seems every issue of GMHTP I open has atleast one 400+ cubic inch LS1 in there. Why do I never see or hear of similar LT1s, are they even out there? I even saw a article about a 454 ci LS6 the other day. Why are there no LT1s like this, what gives?

Maybe the LS1 is the god of all engines? Defend yourselves LT1 owners.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
spraytheway's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 374
From: Great White North
Build a good 383 with really good heads and put some induction and serious rpm into it and those big inch torque LS1's will be in you rear view mirror. I know it for a fact. The regular SBC and LT1 motor is the best small block. LS1's are very trick but they need really big arms to make serious power. You don't need a big LT1 or big regular SBC to make power.You just really good parts and some decent compression and rpm. It will work.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
The biggest reason in just as the After market started going good for the LT1 the LS1 was produced knocking the wind out of our sails.

You can not blame them for not producing as much stuff for a motor that only lived six year when the new Platform was here.

The LS1 has 15* heads from the factory and a taller deck with better cam placement.

I Gave and decided to join them in a sense Going to bore and stroke mine then top it off with 18* heads and a Hogin!
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #4  
1994CamaroZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 319
From: Enid, Oklahoma
I Say Lt1's are stronger engines by far, We see alot of problems yes, but how many 120K+ ls1's are there and 120K+ lt1's? my car is sitting at 160k miles and have not had any trouble with it at all other then transmission. And to call the LS1 god of all engines? is ridiculous. Sure good engine but to go that far isnt logical, you look how years by years engine changes they look at the good and bad and make it better, 10 years from now think back about how good you think ls1's are because they will always be making bigger and badder engines.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
mirroredfire2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
I dunno how much bigger or badder the production engines are gonna get.. I heard emmissions laws are gonna start getting alot tougher because of them damn SUVs doing 7-10 mpg.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
i dont think u can get a LT1 bigger than 402 or something. i see lots of 396's.

the LS1 guys have the advantage of the 6.0 liter truck block to use which gives them a ton of strength and displacement advantages.

only a few shops in the nation can sleeve an LS1 for big CI applications.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:46 PM
  #7  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Think the biggest LT1's were 407's or something..think the LS1 is a 432...Lt1 block isnt stronger..LS1 block can handle just as much power as the LT1 even being aluminum
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:48 PM
  #8  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
i know they can definitely go 409 cu in with lt1.
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:49 PM
  #9  
Camaro37's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 226
From: Texorado
I thought LS1 heads were 18*??? Learn somethin' new every day.

I just have a hard time seeing why tons of LS1 owners have the huge engines w/ a weaker block but the guys with stronger blocks seem to be afraid of building such large engines.

Why would the LT1 be limited to 402 ci.? Too much bore?
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #10  
Cmr0z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,287
From: Palm City, Florida
wrong, www.cmotorsports.com offers a 409 LT1 which is pretty common. John Lingenfelter also built his own 427ci LT1.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 12:28 AM
  #11  
cef97ws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 144
From: Lewisville, TX
Because there are no aftermarket block vendors for the LT1 and it's reverse flow cooling design we are kind of limited by cubic inch because of the location of the stock cam. Without serious costs and machine work a 3.875 stroke crank and 4.100 bore is about as large as you can economically build an LT1. A 4.00 crank would be nice but the cam gets in the way. Anyway that is probably one of the biggest reasons you don't see larger LT1's. LS1's however have block choices with the larger cube capabilities from GMPP without getting into more exotic machine work and cost.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 12:45 AM
  #12  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally posted by spraytheway
Build a good 383 with really good heads and put some induction and serious rpm into it and those big inch torque LS1's will be in you rear view mirror. I know it for a fact. The regular SBC and LT1 motor is the best small block. LS1's are very trick but they need really big arms to make serious power. You don't need a big LT1 or big regular SBC to make power.You just really good parts and some decent compression and rpm. It will work.
Assuming equal mods, the ls1 will be faster.

Ive seen ported ls1 (not even ls6) heads totally outflow ported AFR LT4 heads. Power is in the heads, simple as that.

I will take a built stroker ls1 over a built stroker lt1 any day of the week without hesitation.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 01:11 AM
  #13  
cef97ws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 144
From: Lewisville, TX
atljar I would agree with almost everything you said except that there are a lot of aftermarket heads for Gen 1 small blocks that will outflow LS heads hands down that can be converted to work with an LT1 in the end it just depends on how much money your willing to sink into it for the HP level you want to achieve. I would personally take a 430 cubic in Gen 1 small block over a stroked LS1 anyday.
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #14  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
I've personally seen a 406 LT1, and everyone knows about the 427 LS1. Thing is, that the 427 LS1 aparrently has damn near paper thin cylinder walls. The 406 LT1 still has a little overbore room I believe.

About converting a Gen 1 head to the modern LT1, what kind of cost is associated with this? I know you have to get a custom sheet metal manifold which is some serious coin, but converting just the heads themselves????
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #15  
got_hp?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by cef97ws6
atljar I would agree with almost everything you said except that there are a lot of aftermarket heads for Gen 1 small blocks that will outflow LS heads hands down that can be converted to work with an LT1
you forgot to add "for very large sums of money"


an ls1 guy can just go port his stock heads and get wicked flow for $1500ish


if you want gen1 heads, ported, and converted to lt1 style.......its gonna cost you atleast $3-4 grand total expenses........thats much more than most people are willing to spend.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.