4.3 LT1 crank

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 8, 2008 | 06:41 PM

#16

texas97z

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 298

From: Flower Mound, Tx

Well, I appreciate everyones info and feedback. I will pass this on and let him make the call, his money after all. If we do end up doing this I will post results with driving manners and everything. If not, then we will just call it an interesting idea that was a bad one.

Thanks again everyone.

Oct 8, 2008 | 06:47 PM

#17

Zaknafein

Registered User

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 116

From: Texas

IMO, the only place for a 302... other than a Ford, is in a 69' DZ 302 Camaro.

Oct 27, 2008 | 03:29 PM

#18

TransAm2k4

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 260

From: San Juan, Puerto Rico,USA

What about a LS327??

Nov 4, 2008 | 11:03 AM

#19

G-BODYT56

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2000

Posts: 123

From: Panama City, Florida, USA

5.3L = 323.3 cubic inch, which is basically your 327

. These are very effective and potent powerplants.

Dec 25, 2008 | 06:06 PM

#20

Highlander

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 3,082

From: San Juan PR

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransAm2k4

What about a LS327??

This has been done already... And it made less torque and made more horsepower, but in the end.. having the cubic inches is best. Since the LS motor really has no problem revving they have found that going that route is a waste of money.