LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 vs 396

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
CamaroGod19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
From: In a house
383 vs 396

i am looking to put a 383 stroker or a 396 stroker which one is better and y?
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #2  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by CamaroGod19
i am looking to put a 383 stroker or a 396 stroker which one is better and y?
A 396 has 3% more displacement than a 383, offering approximately 3% more peak performance, assuming you assemble a well-matched set of components.

Parts to build a 396 are going to be a lot more than 3% more expensive than parts to build a 383.

Which is more important to you?
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #3  
blue 79 Z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,000
From: Richmond B.C.
go 383, its not worth it IMO for the added rod to cam and rod to block clearance issues.
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Head selection is FAR more important than that small displacement difference and an area where a HUGE number of folks screwup their stroker builds.

ALL the air going in and out comes and goes through the heads, if they are not right the shortblock can't do much to fix it.
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:51 PM
  #5  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Displacement isn't the whole story.
But overall, I do agree with Jake, the 383 is a much better way to spend your money.
There's a reason you see so many guys with many years of experience behind them running 383s.

Like Dwayne was eluding to, it's the complete package, not excess in any one
component that makes (or breaks) the motor. Having a bullet-proof bottom end is
not terribly useful if you run out of money and have to skimp on the heads or valvetrain
or pick something that just doesn't fit the combo.

The longer stroke means more low-end TQ, it also means more block clearancing and more exposed cylinder wall.
Expect to be welding/filling the block and/or selecting special components to reduce/avoid clearancing issues.
The longer stroke also eats deeper into the piston skirt. But the 396 can handle "more" cam, and compresses
the curve you'd see in a smaller displacement motor.

So, "Which is better?" turns into "How fast do you want to go?", "How much do you want to spend?"
and "Are we talking about a street car, race car, or somewhere in between?".

Here's a computer model example of a 383 VS 396 using identical heads, cam, etc ....
Take it for what you feel it's worth, the idea is simply to show what the increase in displacement does to the curve.


Last edited by user 647483; Apr 20, 2009 at 05:05 PM.
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #6  
n2ceptor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,456
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...&highlight=383

Search is your friend... Many more..
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 07:21 AM
  #7  
sleeperLT1Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 80
From: Richmond, VA
Inches are inches, period. As for cost, a 3.75" stroke crank costs the same as a 3.875" stroke crank. As for clearancing, get the right rods and it won't be a problem. Crower Sportsman Stroker rods are the absolute best for clearance (they are a forged I-Beam design with short bolt heads). H-Beam rods tend to require much more block clearancing. Go bigger, you won't regret it. Plus you won't have to rev it as high, so it will last longer.
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Been discussed a million times, as you already know. I would build a 383, but not a biggie either way.

Rich
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #9  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Build a 383 and put a good set of heads and a nice cam in it. I see far too many people asking if they should put a hotcam in their 383 and then wondering why it only makes 360whp.
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #10  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Originally Posted by rskrause
Been discussed a million times, as you already know. I would build a 383, but not a biggie either way.

Rich
This is his first post??
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #11  
<Puck>'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by Z28SORR
This is his first post??
There is not a post requirement for search - and this site has a very effective one .

Enough posts, opinions, and information on the topic to make your head spin.
Old May 4, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #12  
CamaroGod19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
From: In a house
thanks for the help im going with the 383
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
Aug 27, 2015 05:07 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.