LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 problems....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2004, 06:47 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
camaro4E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
383 problems....

Hello everyone,
I recently upgraded to the popular 383 stroker motor in my 95 camaro z/28 and I am disappointed. I think the guy who built it was a ford man and its too slow for the 6g's that it cost me. Recent dyno's reported 320rwhp. The car has an eagle crank(3.750), JE 5.7 rods, and srp .30 over pistons(all forged S**t). The heads were ported and polished with an all new valve train from comp cams. I'm running 220/230@.050with a .51/.51 lift with a 114 lobe sep. I got everything needed to build a speed demon except for the end result of wheel spinning HP. I do not want to bring it back to the guy because he sat on it for 6 months and I might lose it if I see him. Any help is greatly appreciated b/c I don't wanna sell my Camaro. I NEED HELP!

JOE
camaro4E is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jacksonville,fla
Posts: 1,983
Re: 383 problems....

Originally posted by camaro4E
Hello everyone,
I recently upgraded to the popular 383 stroker motor in my 95 camaro z/28 and I am disappointed. I think the guy who built it was a ford man and its too slow for the 6g's that it cost me. Recent dyno's reported 320rwhp. The car has an eagle crank(3.750), JE 5.7 rods, and srp .30 over pistons(all forged S**t). The heads were ported and polished with an all new valve train from comp cams. I'm running 220/230@.050with a .51/.51 lift with a 114 lobe sep. I got everything needed to build a speed demon except for the end result of wheel spinning HP. I do not want to bring it back to the guy because he sat on it for 6 months and I might lose it if I see him. Any help is greatly appreciated b/c I don't wanna sell my Camaro. I NEED HELP!

JOE
Honestly, I think your cam is your problem, also have you had the car tuned yet?.
MEAN LT1 is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 07:14 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Dyno graph? Rwtq #'s? Other known parameters? Any tuning?

Find out what issues you have with this before throwing another cam in there, which many folks will be quick to advise. That cam is the CC305, and should perform better than it is, especially in a 383.

Need more information please.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 07:17 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Wild1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Orange Kounty, Kalifornia
Posts: 2,277
Also, cam timing might be off and the valves may not be adjusted properly. It should be performing much better than those numbers indicate.
Wild1 is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 07:27 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
camaro4E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
the tuning was done by pcm' for less and he had every bit of info on the car. from manifold pressures to the estimated dyno graph's. torque came out to a little over 345. I think the valves need to be adjusted but will i really gain almost 100 horsepower just over some timing and valve adjustment? The cars fuel system is done all the way back to the tank and intake is a 58mm with manifold porting to match the heads. thanks for the replies fellas.
camaro4E is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 07:30 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
ChevyIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 164
Are you sure the spark plug wires are routed to the right plug from the opti?I would also recommend you do a compression check on each cyclander.Check the basics fuel pressure,spark vaccaum leak.Hang in there it will work out for you.
ChevyIron is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 08:35 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Wild1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Orange Kounty, Kalifornia
Posts: 2,277
Yes, improper valve timing can bleed off power. Also, don't tighten and back off... if you back off at any time, you must return to full loose (beyond zero lash) and then retighten. Otherwise you will affect the lifter bleed operation and will cause some pressurizing issues.
Wild1 is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 09:04 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
gb95zconv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Woodstock,Georgia
Posts: 1,428
I agree that you may have some valve lash and or timing issues. I had a cc305 before I went to the 236/230 and I dynoed 372 hp and 395 tq with stock ported heads and 1.6 rr.
gb95zconv is offline  
Old 02-07-2004, 12:16 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
1982z28with18s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mission, Kansas
Posts: 1,743
Was it dyno'd on a mustang dyno?
1982z28with18s is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
09-19-2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
09-12-2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
09-12-2015 07:47 AM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
08-27-2015 05:07 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
07-26-2015 04:40 PM



Quick Reply: 383 problems....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.