383 le2 h/c/i numbers
I believe the Impala SS gaskets are 0.027". I've heard that optimal quench in around .040". So he should be able to go a little thicker on the gaskets (?). Still, the real question is whether or not 12.3:1 is doable with the cam he's running ???
I've seen it as tight as 0.027", but everything needs to be spot-on. My new engine is right at 0.033" and similar to what was mentioned above, I've also been told by others that 0.040" is the upper limit you should shoot for.
I have a question why tear the motor down to replace the head gasket if Ed Wright already tuned the current setup to run on pump gas? Even if it is at 13:1 or whatever the dyno numbers were done with what 91 octane correct? Now unless you were getting detonation or something or he wasn't able to tune it to run on pump gas then I could see changing the head gaskets.
And no it's not ideal to have and infinitely long rod
I wish there was a way to know my compression for sure without tearing the heads off. SStrokerAce what would you do? Ed said on the last run everything was fine. I believe that lowering the compression would improve my quench therefore resulting in more power. I was also lead to believe that the compression being as high as it is for the cam size is to high and lowering it would help. I need a defanant answer as what to do. I figured a gallon or two of some 100 octane in some premium would be a good bet and to leave things as they are. You know the cam specs what compression should I run. I believe there is more in it help me out.
What is this 91 octane that you speak of?! 87 / 89 / 93 / 100(unleaded) is what we have here... Unless you find a gas station with 5 fuel lines, then there is 87 / 89 / 90 / 92 / 93 something stupid like that.
Some states (like Kalifornia) only have as high as 91 octane at the pump - that's our supreme unleaded.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Bignasty85
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
12
Mar 3, 2015 04:05 PM




