LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 and HOTCAM VS 383 and HT383 crate cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 01:02 AM
  #1  
yorkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 588
From: Madison, North Carolina
383 and HOTCAM VS 383 and HT383 crate cam

I currently have a 383 with Hotcam and was wondering if the HT383 crate motor cam would be better

The crate cam has Dur @ .050 196 int .206 exhaust

Lift int .431 and .451 exh

But has a 109 lobe centerline VS the Hotcam only has 112.
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 07:41 AM
  #2  
PoorMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,534
From: Lousiana
Man, that crate cam suxs. The LSA is tight because their is little over lap with that small of a duration. I would upgrade to a XE 230/236 LSA 112 or maybe slightly larger. It would wake that **** up with some headers. Not a big fan of the cc306 in a 350 but in a 383 I bet it would be a great cam too. Need more duration for the added stroke. The hotcam would be very, very drivable though. I doubt if it has any lope to it at all though.

Jeff D.

Last edited by PoorMan; Jun 16, 2003 at 07:49 AM.
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
Chris'SS #2152's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 332
From: Joliet, IL
Thumbs up

You need a bigger cam than that with a 383.
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #4  
EvilRed93Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7
From: Wilton
Depends on what you are doing with the car. If you are daily driving the car I would go with a hot cam. If you are going to be street/stripping the car i would go with a even bigger one, like the guy above talked about. But the crate cam would DEFINATELY make your 383 project a waste of time. I would be considering it if I were pulling trailers but in a car like yours the HOT cam is a VERY daily drivable cam
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
yorkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 588
From: Madison, North Carolina
got the hot cam now, and it has a lope to it

It is a good cam just wanted some views on it. For my grocery getter it works fine.

Eric
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #6  
James Krawcion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 51
Between those two cams I'd go with the hotcam. That crate cam sounds even smaller than a stock LT-1 cam in some aspects. 383's need a little bit more to breathe there. I'm not a fan of putting small cams in big motors but at least drop in the hotcam. It's a little different sounding than stock but it's a good cam for idle up until about 6200-6300 rpms.
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
yorkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 588
From: Madison, North Carolina
I have the hotcam in my 383 now, was...

just wondering about the HT383 cam and how it would be compared to the hotcam. The hotcam is a pretty healthy cam.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
HarleyZ28
Cars For Sale
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 AM
drptop70ss
Forced Induction
1
Mar 26, 2015 01:50 AM
WildRidez
Parts For Sale
3
Jan 16, 2015 03:10 PM
nballisru
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Dec 14, 2014 05:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.