LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 balancer question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 04:27 AM
  #1  
mrz28 73/97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 776
383 balancer question

Hey everyone I am thinking about doning a low buck 383 rebuild using a Scat 9000 crank & 5.7" 4340 I rods with Speed Pro coated forged pistons & rings. My question is about the harmonic balancer/lower pulley, is it ok to use the factory one or do I have to buy one of the expensive ATI or Fluidamper?
I'm wondering if the added stroke will cause any problems even if the crank is balanced like the stocker?
This engine will have ported LT1 heads, intake and a 230/230 - .560/.560 cam and is a daily driver which will only be raced occasionally.
One other question if rpms are kept below 6500 is a 4 bolt main conversion necessary or can I get by with main studs and/or a main girdle?
Thanks in advance for any and all help you guys/girls can give.
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 07:30 AM
  #2  
magnumv8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 564
From: Quad Cities, IL
IMO, you dont need to do the 4 bolt conversion. As far as the balancer, I was going to try to save some $$ for now and use the stock one, but the hub wouldnt fit the snout of my new crank, and the shop said they couldnt hone it since it is closed at one end. I ended up getting the ATI and they honed the hub to fit. I would check your stock one out, mine was showing signs of wear with only 53,000 miles on it.
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #3  
speedmiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 823
From: houston, tx
Re: 383 balancer question

I'm running the stock balencer with a Scat 9000 3.75 crank. Take the balencer and hub to the machine shop that balences the motor.

I'm running the stock 2bolt mains. Motors been together for 5 and 1/2 years, and seen lot's of spray, without a problem.
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:04 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
LT1 harmonic dampers are neutral balanced. Unless you feel the need to have it checked it does not need to be balanced to the rest of your rotating assy. I'd say you will be OK with the stocker, provided it fits.

Rich Krause
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
Dave88LX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,168
From: AACO, MD
Don't see why not as long as it's in good shape. You can pick up a Powerbond for quite a bit less than a Fluidampr or ATI though.
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #6  
JIMS1999CONVZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
From: Orlando, FL, USA
Balancer

I agree with Rich, You probably don't need it balanced with the crank but read on.

I just had this done with the SCAT 9000 crank and my machinist wanted the New Stock Balancer to balance the entire assembly.
The New Scat cranks needed lots of balancing and the spend a lot of extra time on this and got it down to 1.6 grams, he normally does 2 grams. Yes, the netural balanced stock balancer is the way to go. I only had a block and had to purchase a GM balancer, "OUCH" not cheep. A fluid balancer will NOT work!

Two bolt mains are acceptable. Look at a four bolt and see how much metal the bolt goes down into on the outside bolt. You will see it is not much. Two bolt mains have been spinning high rpms for decades. Most people have never seen the main caps break or distort nor a crank fail, it is usually the rods that fail.

Jim
PS: this crank spun so smooth in the block it was amazing! Too bad I can only spin it to 7K on a 1993 dumb computer! It will spin to 8.5 or 9k easly with the componets.
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
If they balance the assembly with the stock flex/fly and neutral front, the stock one will work fine. (as said already)
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
mrz28 73/97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 776
Thanks for all the replies guys, now I have piece of mind and I can still use my underdrive pulley although I think I will get a keyed hub from Thunder Racing just for a little insurance.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
cheapchevy
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
Apr 8, 2015 08:48 PM
Chevyguy358
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Jan 28, 2015 08:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.