LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

355 vs. 383

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #16  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I like the comment about not being able to hook up the TQ on the street what's the point?

I'm working on a 355 in the shop right now that will torch most 383's anywhere and with some pretty common parts, stock head castings, cast crank, hyd roller. This thing will instantly light up street tires, thank god it's going to run on gumballs most of the time.

Bret
Bring it on down when the weather warms up(summer). There are a couple down here that would take that bet.(383's that is and one ? large) 6.20-6.30 in the 1/8 mile on motor and DR's.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #17  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: 355 vs. 383

It's going to Washington Larry.... and it's a Road Race motor so unless the tires on the front of that thing as big as the rears its not going to be much of a race. Either way 1500's for the bobweight and some healthy heads should make it a screamer.

Get you 383 done already so these guys see what a real one does.

Either way I thought you southern boys liked the winter then you can get those low DA's and run those unobtainable times.

Bret
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #18  
Jeremy95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 282
Re: 355 vs. 383

This is a pretty good topic. I personally wasn't worried about the reliability of the 383, but Bret was the one that commented about reliability. I want to shift somewhere between 6600-6800 rpms. Any other comments?
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #19  
Turbo6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 368
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: 355 vs. 383

I see both sides of the coin. I just got my 383 on the road with initial dyno numbers at Thunder Racing in my sig below. The car is making great power and is a blast to drive. We're currently changing the intake, going to speed density tune, and a few other things, and looking for 500rwhp N/A. On the other hand, a good friend of mine, 95Bird on the board here has a 355 that makes around 470rwhp and that car is also nasty and runs hard. I think if you'd ask him if he'd take the extra cubic inches on his motor, he'd do it in a heartbeat.

So, the question is: Is it worth it? Well, it IS worth it when the additional cost of a nicely built 383 bottom end does not require you to go cheaper or lesser quality on the top end parts including heads, cam, and valvetrain. I'd take a LE2 headed 383 with the proper cam over an LE2 headed 355 with a proper cam anyday.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #20  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
They also designed new heads patterned after race cars (Sb2 and C5R) used Ti rods and valves and increased the valve lift another .100"

And yeah I'll stick by the 355 statement. It's not opinions when you deal with enough of these things.

I can do a 383 that will kick *** it just takes more money.

Bret
I totally agree with Bret on this. 383 will take ALOT more money to do it right, just the plain and simple fact of it(been there, done that). I also went the 355 route, although I could have done a stroker. Sure if ya have the money to go all out with a 383, then do it. On the street, anybody with a 355 with a H/C setup will tell you that you dont really need more torque. Over 350RWHP and kick it down in auto or downshift in a M6 and you will break the tires loose easily at a 40mph roll. I actually prefer a quick revving engine over a torquey one, but hey thats me. As for the downshifting at 40mph statment, i believe thats what the proper gear selection and rear gear choice is for. With the right gears to compliment mods with stock hp you wouldn't need to downshift while passing? And lastly, who says that being able to pussyfoot around and leave the car in 6th to pass a car is fun cuz ya got alittle more torque? Me swatting the shifter @55mph on the highway and getting squirly was plenty of fun for me...
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #21  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by MyZb383
Well, I suppose you could also look at it this way.

When GM wants to put more power in the Vette, what do they do?

5.7L > 6.0L > 7.0L

Ask a new Z06 owner if they wish they could swap their 427 for *less* displacement. Ask Mustang owners all through the '90s if they would have liked more cubes. Ask most guys here who've built a 383 or 396 if they regret it.

Now I know there are plenty of other factors, and there are some fast 355s around, but making categorical statements about "the 355 in your shop that will torch most 383's anywhere" seems a little over the top. I mean, will it torch them anywhere, even in Siberia? How about Lower Slovenia? OK, don't get bent out of shape.....I'm just kiddin' around a little.

The initial poster asked about 355 vs 383. How about owners of both giving him a little feedback without any one person feeling like they have "the" opinion? Seems like that would be cool.

Me personally I would do a 383. Come on down I will build ya one. Max effort will be in the $20,000 range. One that will put out 680-720FWHP on pump gas.Then ya will have to get some REAL tires.
Bret can do it too. When he speeks of average he is talking what most people build and thats a 400-425RWHP verson that most on the board will build or have built.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:22 PM
  #22  
MyZb383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 123
From: Houston, TX
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I can do a 383 that will kick *** it just takes more money.

Bret

But if both were going to be all forged, how much difference is there in the price of the bottom end? Not much. I mean, if you're going forged (as the original poster stated) you're buying a crank, rods and pistons anyway. Small difference, even including the machining on the block.

So the extra $$$ is in the top end. Intake and heads, to be specific, since cam cost is the same. Maybe a little more $$$ for the injectors too.

Maybe some numbers about the $$$ difference specifics would help out the people trying to decide. I don't think it's that much more expensive, given the cost of a "done right" bottom end being close to the same either way, but "expensive" is a relative term.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #23  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
It's going to Washington Larry.... and it's a Road Race motor so unless the tires on the front of that thing as big as the rears its not going to be much of a race. Either way 1500's for the bobweight and some healthy heads should make it a screamer.

Get you 383 done already so these guys see what a real one does.

Either way I thought you southern boys liked the winter then you can get those low DA's and run those unobtainable times.

Bret

Well he could always make a pass and turn left and come back the other way,shifting 'bout 10,500!!!!
DA is one thing,cold is another. They are still running on Fri night and Sun afternoon. When it get's to a high of 40* with a 20MPH "breeze",overcast and 90% humidity, I stay my old a** by the fire.

Working my *** off on it.Doing the exhaust now 3-1/2 Y into a 4" out the back and NOTHING can be bought it has to be MADE and I ain't gonna pay somebody to do what I can do and probably neater.Muflex hangs out the bottom too much and the ride height is Loooooo. Only want to do it once and not redo every weekend of being on the street and getting drug off.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #24  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by MyZb383
But if both were going to be all forged, how much difference is there in the price of the bottom end? Not much. I mean, if you're going forged (as the original poster stated) you're buying a crank, rods and pistons anyway. Small difference, even including the machining on the block.

So the extra $$$ is in the top end. Intake and heads, to be specific, since cam cost is the same. Maybe a little more $$$ for the injectors too.

Maybe some numbers about the $$$ difference specifics would help out the people trying to decide. I don't think it's that much more expensive, given the cost of a "done right" bottom end being close to the same either way, but "expensive" is a relative term.
Your right, the bottom end costs are relatively similar. There are a few things that can take the average 383 to cost a bit more than a 355 but thats it. The air requirements for a 7000 RPM 383 are just not fulfillable with stock castings as far as I can tell. Also from what i have seen personally and from some other very good sources theres is much to be gained on even a 355 with a single plane conversion, more cubes just elevates this. So if ya add the cost of an aftermarket head (TFS, AFR, Converted Gen 1, etc) plus the additional work needed, and valvetrain parts, then the single plane conversion which is around $1500, but can be even more expensive from vertain sources. Thats a pretty easily calculated $3000+ on the very conservative side.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #25  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by MyZb383
But if both were going to be all forged, how much difference is there in the price of the bottom end? Not much. I mean, if you're going forged (as the original poster stated) you're buying a crank, rods and pistons anyway. Small difference, even including the machining on the block.

So the extra $$$ is in the top end. Intake and heads, to be specific, since cam cost is the same. Maybe a little more $$$ for the injectors too.

Maybe some numbers about the $$$ difference specifics would help out the people trying to decide. I don't think it's that much more expensive, given the cost of a "done right" bottom end being close to the same either way, but "expensive" is a relative term.

To do one "right" ya gonna have 1,000-1,200 in machine shop work. I don't want to hear all the" I got mine done for 500". If ya did ya didn't do it right. 355 will cost almost that much if done "right".
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #26  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by 89385formula
Your right, the bottom end costs are relatively similar. There are a few things that can take the average 383 to cost a bit more than a 355 but thats it. The air requirements for a 7000 RPM 383 are just not fulfillable with stock castings as far as I can tell. Also from what i have seen personally and from some other very good sources theres is much to be gained on even a 355 with a single plane conversion, more cubes just elevates this. So if ya add the cost of an aftermarket head (TFS, AFR, Converted Gen 1, etc) plus the additional work needed, and valvetrain parts, then the single plane conversion which is around $1500, but can be even more expensive from vertain sources. Thats a pretty easily calculated $3000+ on the very conservative side.
There is one down here that runs 10.3's with stock castings 2.0I/1.56E@3400lbs and a Holley SR.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #27  
Turbo6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 368
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: 355 vs. 383

1racerdude brings up a good point in the post above about nothing can be bought off the shelf, it has to be made. If anything, that is the one thing that frustrates me to no end...whenever I need a part for my motor, I can't just call up a vendor and have it shipped the next day. When you build a 400rwhp or lower motor, you can get your valvesprings, pushrods, guideplates, gaskets, spark plugs that day.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #28  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by Jeremy95TA
This is a pretty good topic. I personally wasn't worried about the reliability of the 383, but Bret was the one that commented about reliability. I want to shift somewhere between 6600-6800 rpms. Any other comments?
If it is built right and all forged With GOOD heads and intake ya could shift at 8,500 no problem.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #29  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by Turbo6
1racerdude brings up a good point in the post above about nothing can be bought off the shelf, it has to be made. If anything, that is the one thing that frustrates me to no end...whenever I need a part for my motor, I can't just call up a vendor and have it shipped the next day. When you build a 400rwhp or lower motor, you can get your valvesprings, pushrods, guideplates, gaskets, spark plugs that day.
Turbo6
I was speaking about this @##@@%%^^^& exhaust. Bend or couple together bends to put the 4" over the axle and out the back with a sump in the tank. Them foreign cars ain't got nothing on this exhaust. It's damn near as big as a coffee can. Gonna look like a diesel school bus hanging out the back. Heeee Heeee
Ya are right all of the stuff for the shop car had to be built,remade to fit,or otherwise special. Somethings ya have to make the car fit them too.
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:51 PM
  #30  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Re: 355 vs. 383

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
There is one down here that runs 10.3's with stock castings 2.0I/1.56E@3400lbs and a Holley SR.
Definately not the norm thats for sure, i think you would agree with me on that. For what its worth, from my experiences there are alot of dissappointing times with 383's compared to 355's. I do think thats mostly due
to people just assuming that a 383 is better, and not talking into consideration the extra cost. This leads them to short change the topend IMO. My first personal experience with my 383 was a real eye opener as far as costs go, especially when i thought for so long that the price of a 355 and a 383 were virtually the same...i definately shifted my thoughts about a 383 being a "budget Build". For the 355 build i went with, it was actually the most budget oriented motor i have had built thus far....and personally I wouldn't want anything less.

Like I said before my vote goes for a 355 unless you have some real high goals, and a large pocketbook.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.