350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Ok, all I need to know is, is it possible to run the LT1 harness and computer on a Gen 1 SBC and use a regular distributor.... or would you HAVE to use a DFI system or something. Dont say it wont work with heads and intake as this will be a very custom setup.
Thanks,
Joel
Thanks,
Joel
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by Firebird355
Ok, all I need to know is, is it possible to run the LT1 harness and computer on a Gen 1 SBC and use a regular distributor.... or would you HAVE to use a DFI system or something. Dont say it wont work with heads and intake as this will be a very custom setup.
Thanks,
Joel
Thanks,
Joel
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Yea it will work,use the opti to control the injector firing and the dist to do the timing and not connected to the computer.Ya will have to get the balancer keyed and get a aftermarket one with timing marks to set your timing.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by RE AND CHERYL
If your running a Gen I motor in a 4th gen and want fuel injection, go DFI.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by RE AND CHERYL
I don't think LR read the post right. The stock LT1 computer won't run with out the Opti, and you can't run an Opti on a gen I motor. If your running a Gen I motor in a 4th gen and want fuel injection, go DFI.
The LT-1 WILL run without the spark side of the opti and a dist for spark.If ya run a FAST on an LT-1 ya got to have the opti for the injectors or a crank trigger or a dist with two modules.
If ya can't don't tell these guys or my shop car, that are doing it,that it can't be done.
Last edited by 1racerdude; Jun 1, 2005 at 07:38 AM.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by WS Sick
The trick with the traditional SBC will be to figure out how to drive the opti.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
The LT-1 WILL run without the spark side of the opti and a dist for spark.If ya run a FAST on an LT-1 ya got to have the opti for the injectors or a crank trigger or a dist with two modules.
If ya can't don't tell these guys or my shop car, that are doing it,that it can't be done.
If ya can't don't tell these guys or my shop car, that are doing it,that it can't be done.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
If ya are going to an early model there are several companies that have the injector drivers in a box ready to plug in,with the harness,and everything.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Read post above your's
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Originally Posted by Injuneer
I still think you're reading it wrong. He's not saying the LT1 PCM will not run without the high voltage side of the Opti. He's saying you need the optical signals for the LT1 PCM to function (or a sim chip like the one Electromotive sold briefly with the SDI/Opti-Eliminator package). People have also managed to do that by installing the optical sensor module in a conventional distributor.
There is one down here that has a conventional looking dist,and EFI.
It has two moduals in it one for spark and one for the EFI. Says he bought it from MSD built like that.From there ya need the injector control box and harness and you're set. This is in a '94 and the stock computer is retained for tranny and guages,ect.It's running in the low 11's and I have not looked at the car in the daytime yet,but I'm gonna.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
If he's running the fuel injection with an aftermarket ECU, off the MSD dstributor signal, its no problem. MSD also makes a "stub" mount cam position sensor for their "coil per cylinder" setup. Looks just like a drive shaft for a distributor, and plugs into the distributor hole. I always thought all it would take is one of the "smart" guys here to come up with a "chip" to translate the MSD CPC stub data to the Opti low res pulse pattern.
I run the MoTeC ECU in full sequential, using the Opti optical signals, and the stock PCM is used to turn on the fuel pump, control IAC and the speedo. I still have the Opti and most of the other sensors paralleled to both computers.
The guys at NEDyno briefly touted a cam position sensor they welded into a stock LT1 timing cover, using the FAST/eDIST setup, but I don't think it ever worked too well. With a single point cam position sensor, you losing the high resolution level data that the Opti can provide. With a setup like the MoTec, where you can tune injector pulse timing, and tweek individual cylinders for fuel and ignition advance, the high res data from the Opti serves a very useful purpose.
I run the MoTeC ECU in full sequential, using the Opti optical signals, and the stock PCM is used to turn on the fuel pump, control IAC and the speedo. I still have the Opti and most of the other sensors paralleled to both computers.
The guys at NEDyno briefly touted a cam position sensor they welded into a stock LT1 timing cover, using the FAST/eDIST setup, but I don't think it ever worked too well. With a single point cam position sensor, you losing the high resolution level data that the Opti can provide. With a setup like the MoTec, where you can tune injector pulse timing, and tweek individual cylinders for fuel and ignition advance, the high res data from the Opti serves a very useful purpose.
Re: 350 chevy vs Opti vs LT1 computer system
Speartech was looking at selling an opti/HEI hybrid for use on LT1s and gen1s with LT1 engine management. Project is on the back burner at this time but maybe some polite interest expressed to him could move it along. It was basically an HEI with the optical sensors for the opti.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM



