LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

3.73 to 3.23 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
3.73 to 3.23 ?

I drive a 96 Z28 with some goodies on it that has me running 12:90 @ 108. Thats with 3.73 gears. Engine mods staying the same, if I were to down grade to 323's what kind of ET/trap loss would i suffer? Gas prices are a bi*ch in FL. Just curious?

Last edited by MPZ28; Jun 25, 2005 at 07:01 PM.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #2  
CamaroZ2894's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
From: Fort Worth
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

i dont know but i have a set of 3.23 if ya want to trade.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #3  
Birdman7389's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,736
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

I'll trade you and kick in a few bucks.......
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #4  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

SOrry guys , the bearings , gears and everything are shot. Im thinking of dropping back down to 323's because of high gas prices. I just want to know how much 323's will slow me down seeing i run a 12:90 with 373's
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #5  
LUDA0840's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 512
From: Austin, Tx
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

hmm around .2 or .3.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #6  
LT1-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

I wouldn't think it would slow down your final time, just your acceleration. But then your top end power would be a little faster. So it's hard to say. Try it and let us know
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #7  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

Hmm, sounds good. I've never had 323's in my car so, the 323 feeling should be fun for those 45-50 mph roles.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #8  
kainZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 416
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

I wouldn't think it would slow down your final time, just your acceleration. But then your top end power would be a little faster.
How would the top end power be faster with a lower numerical gear?
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #9  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

good question but, 323 gears are a new animal to me so , i guess im in for some kind of change ?
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
kainZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 416
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

Originally Posted by MPZ28
Hmm, sounds good. I've never had 323's in my car so, the 323 feeling should be fun for those 45-50 mph roles.
The 323 feeling? I don't know what you guys are talking about? 373s will give you faster acceleration in any gear at any rpm, assuming you have traction...
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:28 PM
  #11  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

thats what i thought, 323's are going to slow me down all around the tack.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #12  
kainZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 416
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

Originally Posted by MPZ28
good question but, 323 gears are a new animal to me so , i guess im in for some kind of change ?
Think of it like multiplication, and ignore the tranny (pretend 4th gear on an M6):

Engine RPM * Gear Ratio = Output RPM

Increase the gear ratio number, and you increase the speed at which your wheels spin per engine revolution. The faster your wheels spin, well, assuming traction, the faster you go!
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #13  
Jameslt1TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,152
From: Wyoming
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

I think i only gained 3 or 4 tenths by swithing to 4.10s from 2.73s. Maybe you could make a comprimise and run 3.42s which are a good gear, they work great with n2o.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #14  
kainZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 416
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

Originally Posted by MPZ28
thats what i thought, 323's are going to slow me down all around the tack.
Well, if you have no traction with 3.73, you might go faster with 3.23, because you'll spend less time spinning your tires at the line... but if you can drive 3.73 at the track without wheelspin, then yeah, you'll probably lose at least few tenths with 3.23s.

Apparently there are some confirmed otherwise stock 5spd Mach1 Mustangs which switch to 4.11 rear end gears and slicks and run low 12's at the track (Launching at 6800rpm with no wheelspin). Granted, these guys must be great drivers, but that is impressive.

Note: I say apparently confirmed because I have yet to see this in person.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #15  
MPZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
From: Orlando FL.
Re: 3.73 to 3.23 ?

lmao @ " My exaust sounds better then your stereo" I just put on Magnaflow cat back with jet hot long tubes. Sometimes i leave the radio off so i can listen to my car.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.