LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related
View Poll Results: Which is best overall
Pacesetters long tubes
7
46.67%
Jet-Hot long tubes
8
53.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

2ND Shot Pacesetters VS. Jet-Hots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2004 | 07:21 PM
  #1  
CAMZ97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
From: Bronx,NY
2ND Shot Pacesetters VS. Jet-Hots

Ok I think I did right this time, Lets get a poll goin on these 2 longtube headers
Old May 6, 2004 | 07:25 PM
  #2  
ponyackn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 990
From: Sac to SoCal
:crowd cheers:

From what i've read here, they both look great. Based on it's quality and price, I plan to go with the pacesetters.
Old May 6, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #3  
AdamZ1LE28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
From: Central Massachusetts
everyone talks about how bad their shorty's were....i guess they've really cleaned up their act. I started taking my stock manifolds off today, and I'll be buying some Pacesetters as soon as I get the money.

Everyone deserves a 2nd chance
Old May 6, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #4  
AdamZ1LE28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
From: Central Massachusetts
I originally wanted the TPIS LT's, but since they'd be close to $1000 delivered, they're out of the question. PaceSetter is supposed to have just as good ground clearance and plug clearance as the TPIS. They're worth a shot...
Old May 6, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #5  
CAMZ97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
From: Bronx,NY
I cant believe I got it I must be a freakin geeneeus
Old May 6, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
Spinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,945
From: Fort Benning, GA
Jet-Hot. Higher quality then the pacesetters from what I've seen personally. I love mine for sure
Old May 7, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #7  
CAMZ97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
From: Bronx,NY
cmon guys need more opinions on this poll
Old May 7, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
Cmr0z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,287
From: Palm City, Florida
It's as simple as this: the installation of pacesetter long tubes is as easy as a header install is going to get. No motor jacking, no modifications at all, except the bending of the AC line on the passenger side which is very common.

I don't know what more to ask for as far as the quality is concerned....the welds are great, the header gaskets are doing just fine (flanges are good)

If I had to do it again, I'd go pacesetter in a heartbeat. What sounds better to you? $548 shipped ceramic coated w/y pipe, or $770 for jet hot?
Old May 7, 2004 | 11:49 PM
  #9  
Haskin Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 322
From: Bonita Springs, Florida, USA
opionions will be completely biased here, i obviously chose pacesetters and im not going to say which is better but i have no regrets in my choice, i will give u this, 80 degrees it made 265 rwhp 298 rwtq before the LTs, after the LTs in 97 degree heat, the only thing i changed were the LTs and y pipe and let it open after the y, it made 291.0 324.4, i dont know about you but 27rwhp 26 rwtq seems like a pretty good gain to me? and those gains might have been higher had the temp been 20 degrees lower like the previous dyno(this was done at the same shop on the same dyno)
Old May 8, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #10  
CAMZ97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
From: Bronx,NY
Wow thats a big gain with the pacesetters, Its over a 200 dollar difference and it seems to perform
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
68camaroboltz
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Oct 5, 2015 11:56 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 18, 2015 03:46 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Sep 15, 2015 11:53 AM
GusarskiSS
Exhaust System
1
Sep 2, 2015 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.