265 cid LT1
265 cid LT1
I didn't know this engine existed until recently. Apparently it was an option on 94-96 Caprices(?).
Anyone familiar with this motor?
Are the external dimensions different than the familiar 350 cube motor?
It is reverse flow cooled, like an LT1-350, right?
Anyone familiar with this motor?
Are the external dimensions different than the familiar 350 cube motor?
It is reverse flow cooled, like an LT1-350, right?
You can look for "Baby LT1"
It's essentially the same engine - only it displaces 4.3L.........
I've heard that if a person uses the crank out of the 4.3L V8 in a 5.7L V8 you'll end up with a final displacement of 302......
Kinda cool.......302 was the displacement of the original Z28.
Now that would be a cool stroker.
It's essentially the same engine - only it displaces 4.3L.........
I've heard that if a person uses the crank out of the 4.3L V8 in a 5.7L V8 you'll end up with a final displacement of 302......
Kinda cool.......302 was the displacement of the original Z28.

Now that would be a cool stroker.
So if you destroke the engine to 302, I wonder if you could somehow bore it to make a 327. I think it would be cool to have a 327 LT1.
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.
Can anyone justify this?
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.
Can anyone justify this?
Originally posted by soontobeGN
So if you destroke the engine to 302, I wonder if you could somehow bore it to make a 327. I think it would be cool to have a 327 LT1.
So if you destroke the engine to 302, I wonder if you could somehow bore it to make a 327. I think it would be cool to have a 327 LT1.
BTW, the original 327 had a 3.25 stroke. 302-327-350 had same bore.
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke?
Yes, shorter stroke, other factors equal, allows higher revs. This is why revs is not the factor used to determine the limitations of an engine, but rather piston speed, which takes into account, the stroke. Which is why, a model airplane engine reving to 20,000 rpm, is ho-hum.
Last edited by arnie; Mar 22, 2004 at 06:18 PM.
Originally posted by soontobeGN
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.
-Chris
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM



