LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

265 cid LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #1  
eddyj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5
265 cid LT1

I didn't know this engine existed until recently. Apparently it was an option on 94-96 Caprices(?).
Anyone familiar with this motor?
Are the external dimensions different than the familiar 350 cube motor?
It is reverse flow cooled, like an LT1-350, right?
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #2  
dnz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 771
From: Houston Tx
do a search under mini, small, etc lt1 and you should find alot of info.
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
You can look for "Baby LT1"

It's essentially the same engine - only it displaces 4.3L.........

I've heard that if a person uses the crank out of the 4.3L V8 in a 5.7L V8 you'll end up with a final displacement of 302......

Kinda cool.......302 was the displacement of the original Z28.

Now that would be a cool stroker.
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
soontobeGN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 483
From: South Jersey
So if you destroke the engine to 302, I wonder if you could somehow bore it to make a 327. I think it would be cool to have a 327 LT1.

And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.

Can anyone justify this?
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #5  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Originally posted by soontobeGN
So if you destroke the engine to 302, I wonder if you could somehow bore it to make a 327. I think it would be cool to have a 327 LT1.
Don't count of it. Consider .060" the realistic max for overbore.
BTW, the original 327 had a 3.25 stroke. 302-327-350 had same bore.

And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke?

Yes, shorter stroke, other factors equal, allows higher revs. This is why revs is not the factor used to determine the limitations of an engine, but rather piston speed, which takes into account, the stroke. Which is why, a model airplane engine reving to 20,000 rpm, is ho-hum.

Last edited by arnie; Mar 22, 2004 at 06:18 PM.
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
Chrisbequick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 669
From: Kansas City
Originally posted by soontobeGN
And then, would you be able to rev considerably higher with the smaller stroke? If so, I think it may make a helluva starting point for a turbo motor.
Actually, turbos like lots of stroke. More stroke creates more exhaust gas velocity, which spools a turbo quicker.

-Chris
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
Lonemechanic
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Feb 19, 2015 10:29 AM
rje
Drag Racing Technique
7
Sep 9, 2002 12:35 PM
Hot Rod Hawk
Midwest
4
Aug 30, 2002 10:12 PM
LS1346CID
Car Audio and Electronics
2
Aug 27, 2002 12:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.