230/242 problems???
230/242 problems???
I believe there may be something not quite right with my setup and am looking for opinions. Here are the mods to my '94 Z - A4:
Mildly ported heads (no flow numbers), 2.0 and 1.56 valves, 230 / 242 113lsa cam, 355cid, PI VIG 3500, LT's - !CAT - Borla, Program by PCMFORLESS, along with other bolt-ons.
Anyway.... went to a dyno on Sat and here are the results.
321 RWHP
289 RWTQ
My AFR was around 13.5 to 14 between 5500 and 6000 rpms, where the cam started to drop off in power. Further, no knock was recorded on this run.
This was a Dynojet w/ SAE correction factor (if it makes any differance. Temps were in the upper 80's and humidity was also high.
I am pretty sure there is something going on here. I expected more out of this setup than that. The only thing I can think of is maybe I have my valves set too tight (went 3/4 turn past 0 lash). Any opinions on what else to look for?? Thanks
~John
Mildly ported heads (no flow numbers), 2.0 and 1.56 valves, 230 / 242 113lsa cam, 355cid, PI VIG 3500, LT's - !CAT - Borla, Program by PCMFORLESS, along with other bolt-ons.
Anyway.... went to a dyno on Sat and here are the results.
321 RWHP
289 RWTQ
My AFR was around 13.5 to 14 between 5500 and 6000 rpms, where the cam started to drop off in power. Further, no knock was recorded on this run.
This was a Dynojet w/ SAE correction factor (if it makes any differance. Temps were in the upper 80's and humidity was also high.
I am pretty sure there is something going on here. I expected more out of this setup than that. The only thing I can think of is maybe I have my valves set too tight (went 3/4 turn past 0 lash). Any opinions on what else to look for?? Thanks
~John
As long as your car is not idling rough or trying to die at idle the valves are probably not too tight. Don't be disappointed until you run it at the track though. My only concern is the amount of additional exhaust duration your cam has. You are going to give away a lot of torque in a N/A motor with LT's with that much additional exhaust duration on spray it will be OK JMO.
Originally posted by cef97ws6
As long as your car is not idling rough or trying to die at idle the valves are probably not too tight. Don't be disappointed until you run it at the track though. My only concern is the amount of additional exhaust duration your cam has. You are going to give away a lot of torque in a N/A motor with LT's with that much additional exhaust duration on spray it will be OK JMO.
As long as your car is not idling rough or trying to die at idle the valves are probably not too tight. Don't be disappointed until you run it at the track though. My only concern is the amount of additional exhaust duration your cam has. You are going to give away a lot of torque in a N/A motor with LT's with that much additional exhaust duration on spray it will be OK JMO.
I understand this is a good cam for nitrous and that is what I had planned for this year, I just thought my N/A numbers would be better than this. ......... Still looking for answers.
~John
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



